The main purpose of this study was to examine the effects of familiarity with the sound of a melody on children’s performance of the melody. Children in kindergarten through fourth grade (N = 97) with no previous formal instrumental instruction were taught to play a four-measure melody on a keyboard during an individual instruction session. Before learning to play the melody, half of the children listened to a model of the melody repeatedly in music class to become familiar with the music. Children’s familiarity with the melody was assessed through a melodic error identification test administered immediately before and after instruction. The results indicated that children who were familiar with the melody played significantly more correct notes than did children not familiar with the melody and that performance accuracy increased with grade level.
Alexander, D., Kowalchyk, G., Lancaster, E.L., McArthur, V., & Mier, M. ( 2005). Alfred’s premier piano course Level 1A. Van Nuys, CA: Alfred.
2.
Baker, D.S. ( 1980). The effect of appropriate and inappropriate in-class song performance models on performance preference of third- and fourth-grade students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 28, 3-17.
3.
Bandura, A. ( 1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
4.
Barclay, R., & Newell, K. ( 1980). Children’s processing of information in motor skill acquisition. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 30, 98-108.
5.
Barry, N., & Hallam, S. ( 2002). Practicing. In R. Parncutt & G.E. McPherson (Eds.), The science and psychology of musical performance: Creative strategies for teaching and learning (pp. 151-165). New York: Oxford University Press.
6.
Colprit, E. ( 2000). Observation and analysis of Suzuki string teaching. Journal of Research in Music Education, 48, 206-225.
7.
Costa-Giomi, E. ( 2003). Young children’s harmonic perception. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 999, 477-484.
8.
Costa-Giomi, E., & Sasaki, W. ( 2003, April). What differentiates high and low achievement piano students? Teacher and student behaviors during three years of lessons. Invited paper presented at the International Symposium for Research in Music Behavior, Chicago.
9.
Demorest, S., & Schultz, S. ( 2004). Children’s preference for authentic versus arranged versions of world music recordings. Journal of Research in Music Education, 52, 300-313.
10.
Dickey, M. ( 1991). A comparison of verbal instruction and nonverbal teacher-student modeling in instrumental ensembles. Journal of Research in Music Education, 39, 132-142.
11.
Dickey, M. ( 1992). A review of research on modeling in music teaching and learning. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education , 113, 27-40.
12.
Drake, C., & Palmer, C. ( 2000). Skill acquisition in music performance: Relationship between planning and temporal control. Cognition, 74, 1-32.
13.
Duke, R.A. ( 1999). Teacher and student behavior in Suzuki string lessons: Results from the International Research Symposium on Talent Education. Journal of Research in Music Education, 47, 293-307.
14.
Duke, R.A., & Simmons, A. ( 2006). The nature of expertise: Narrative descriptions of 19 common elements observed in the lessons of three renowned artist-teachers (oboist Richard Killmer, violist Donald McInnes, pianist Nelita True). Bulletin of the Council of Research in Music Education, 170, 7-19.
15.
Ebie, B. ( 2004). The effects of verbal, vocally modeled, kinesthetic, and audio-visual treatment conditions on male and female middle-school vocal music students’ abilities to expressively sing melodies. Psychology of Music, 32(4), 405-417.
16.
Faber, R., & Faber, N. ( 1996). Piano adventures primer level. Ft. Lauderdale, FL: FJH Music.
Fung, C.V. ( 1994). College students preferences for world musics. Contributions to Music Education, 21, 46-63.
19.
Getz, R. ( 1966). The effects of repetition on listening response. Journal of Research in Music Education, 14, 178-192.
20.
Heingartner, A., & Hall, J.V. ( 1974). Affective consequences in adults and children of repeated exposure to auditory stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 719-723.
21.
Henley, P. ( 2001). Effects of modeling and tempo patterns as practice techniques on the performance of high school instrumentalists. Journal of Research in Music Education, 49, 307-322.
22.
Hewitt, M. ( 2001). The effects of modeling, self-evaluation, and self-listening on junior high instrumentalists’ music performance and practice attitude . Journal of Research in Music Education, 49, 307-322.
23.
Kaufman, A., & Kaufman, N. ( 2002). Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
24.
Kostka, M. ( 1984). An investigation of reinforcements, time use, and student attentiveness in piano lessons. Journal of Research in Music Education, 32, 113-122.
25.
Kreader, B., Kern, F., Kevern, P., & Rejino, M. ( 1996). Hal Leonard standard piano library piano lessons Book 1. Milwaukee, WI: Hal Leonard.
26.
Madsen, C.K., Greer, R.D., & Madsen, C.H. ( 1975). Research in music behavior. New York : Teachers College Press.
27.
McPherson, G. ( 2005). From child to musician: Skill development during the beginning stages of learning an instrument. Psychology of Music, 33, 5-33.
28.
Morrison, S.J., & Cheung, S.Y. ( 1999). Preference responses and use of written descriptors among music and nonmusic majors in the United States, Hong Kong, and the People’s Republic of China. Journal of Research in Music Education , 47, 5-17.
29.
Rosenthal, R. ( 1984). The relative effects of guided model, model only, guide only, and practice only treatments on the accuracy of advanced instrumentalists’ musical performance. Journal of Research in Music Education , 32, 265-273.
30.
Rosenthal, R., Wilson, M., Evans, M., & Greenwalt, L. ( 1988). Effects of different practice conditions on advanced instrumentalists’ performance accuracy. Journal of Research in Music Education, 36, 250-257.
31.
Sang, R.C. ( 1987). A study of the relationship between instrumental music teachers’ modeling skills and pupil performance behavior. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 91, 155-159.
32.
Shea, C., Wright, D., Wulf, G., & Whitacre, C. ( 2000). Physical and observational practice afford unique learning opportunities. Journal of Motor Behavior, 32, 27-36.
33.
Shea, C., Wulf, G., Park, J., & Gaunt, B. ( 2001). Effects of an auditory model on the learning of relative and absolute timing. Journal of Motor Behavior, 33, 127-138.
34.
Siebnaler, D. ( 1997). Analysis of teacher-student interactions in the piano lessons of adults and children. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45, 6-20.
35.
Speer, D. ( 1994). An analysis of sequential patterns of instruction in piano lessons. Journal of Research in Music Education, 42, 14-26.
