The purpose of this study was to examine the perceptions of experienced music teachers regarding their preparation for and experience of mentoring in a 2-year mentor project focusing on the support of teachers in Title I schools in Orlando, Florida. Data included the following: initial expectations of mentoring from Year 1 (note cards), biggest challenges from Year 2 (note cards), mentor development session interactions from Years 1 and 2, interviews with mentors at the end of the study period, and research logs from the two researchers. Findings suggest that mentors need mentors; time management is a challenge for mentors; communication with the mentee is a challenge; observations of the mentees are necessary but difficult; technology can be a positive resource for mentor and mentee interaction; and mentors struggle to keep mentee interactions in the realm of support and not evaluation.
Achinstein, B., & Athanases, S.Z. (2006). Introduction: New visions for mentoring new teachers. In B. Achinstein & S. Z. Athanases (Eds.), Mentors in the making (pp. 1-22) New York: Teachers College Press.
2.
Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3-15.
3.
Conway, C.M. (2003a). An examination of district-sponsored beginning music teacher mentor practices. Journal of Research in Music Education, 51(1), 6-23.
4.
Conway, C. M. (Ed.). (2003b). Great beginnings for music teachers: Mentoring and supporting new teachers . Reston, VA: Music Educators National Conference.
5.
Conway, C.M., Krueger, P., Robinson, M., Haack, P., & Smith, M.V. (2002). Beginning music teacher mentor and induction policy: A cross-state perspective, Arts Education Policy Review, 104(2), 9-17.
6.
Craig, P. (1978). The heart of a teacher: A heuristic study of the inner world of teaching. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms International.
7.
Davis, B. (2006). Curriculum to support mentor development: Lessons from field-tested practices. In B. Achinstein & S. Z. Athanases (Eds.), Mentors in the making (pp. 109-124) New York: Teachers College Press.
8.
Denzin, N.K., & Lincoln, Y.S. (2006). The discipline and practice of qualitative research . In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 1-32). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
Douglass, B., & Moustakas, C. (1985). Heuristic inquiry: The internal search to know . Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 25(3), 39-55.
10.
Feiman-Nemser, S. (1993). Teacher mentoring: A critical review. Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Teaching and Teacher Education.
11.
Feiman-Nemser, S., Schwille, S., Carver, C., & Yusko, B. (1999). A conceptual review of literature on new teacher induction. Washington, DC: National Partnership for Excellence and Accountability in Teaching. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED449147)
12.
Gless, J. (2006). Designing mentoring programs to transform school cultures. In B. Achinstein & S. Z. Athanases (Eds.), Mentors in the making (pp. 165-176). New York: Teachers College Press.
13.
Helman, L. (2006). What's in a conversation? Mentoring stances in coaching conferences and how they matter. In B. Achinstein & S. Z. Athanases (Eds.), Mentors in the making (pp. 69-82). New York: Teachers College Press.
14.
Merriam, S. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Franscisco: Jossey-Bass .
15.
Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
Porter, A., Youngs, P., & Odden, A. (2001). Advances in teacher assessments and their uses . In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 259-297). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association .
17.
Robinson, M. (2003). Assistance versus assessment. In C. M. Conway (Ed.), Great beginnings for music teachers: Mentoring and supporting new teachers (pp. 127-132). Reston, VA: Music Educators National Conference.
18.
Robinson, M. (2005). The impact of beginning music teacher assessment on the assessors: Notes from experienced teachers. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 164, 49-60.
19.
Schwartz, H. (1996). The changing nature of teacher education. In J. Sikula, T. J. Buttery, & E. Guyton (Eds), Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed., pp. 2-13). New York: Macmillan .
20.
Shore, L., & Stokes, L. (2006). The exploratorium leadership program in science education: Inquiry into discipline-specific teacher induction. In B. Achinstein & S. Z. Athanases (Eds.), Mentors in the making (pp. 96-108). New York: Teachers College Press.
21.
Smith, M.V. (2003). Making mentoring work. In C. M. Conway (Ed.), Great beginnings for music teachers: Mentoring and supporting new teachers (pp. 105-126) Reston, VA: Music Educators National Conference.
