Objective: We investigate the role that neighborhood socioeconomic contexts and defendant mobility patterns play in prosecutorial charge reductions. Methods: Using data from a large sample of criminal defendants prosecuted during 2010 to 2011 in New York County (N = 68,113), we analyze differences in charge reductions for defendants who reside and offend in low- and high-income areas, and for those who traverse socioeconomically divergent neighborhoods when committing crime. Results: Net of individual defendant characteristics, like gender and race, we find that defendants from low-income neighborhoods who offend in high-income locales are significantly less likely to benefit from discretionary charge reductions. Conclusions: Defendant mobility patterns play a key role in defining the social context of criminal punishment. This suggests it is essential to consider both where a defendant resides and where their crime is committed when assessing the role of ecological stereotypes and place-based attributions in criminal court actor decision-making.
AlbonettiC. A.1986. “Criminality, Prosecutorial Screening, and Uncertainty: Toward a Theory of Discretionary Decision Making in Felony Case Processings.” Criminology24(4):623‐44.
AlschulerA.1968. “The Prosecutor's Role in Plea Bargaining.” University of Chicago Law Review36:50‐112.
4.
AuerhahnK.HendersonJ. S.McConnellP. R.LockwoodB.. 2017. “Are you Judged by the Residence you Keep? Homicide Sentencing, Attribution and Neighborhood Context.” Criminology, Criminal Justice, Law & Society18(1):28‐51.
5.
BelsleyD. A.KuhE.WelschR. E.. 2005. Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
6.
BernascoW.BlockR.. 2009. “Where Offenders Choose to Attack: A Discrete Choice Model of Robberies in Chicago.” Criminology47(1):93‐130.
7.
BlackD.1976. The Behavior of law. New York, NY: Academic Press.
8.
BlockR. L.BlockC. R.. 1995. “Space, Place and Crime: Hot Spot Areas and hot Places of Liquor-Related Crime.” Crime and Place4(2):145‐84.
BridgesG. S.SteenS.. 1998. “Racial Disparities in Official Assessments of Juvenile Offenders: Attributional Stereotypes as Mediating Mechanisms.” American Sociological Review63(4):554‐70.
11.
CanterD.YoungsD.. 2008. Principles of Geographical Offender Profiling. New York, NY: Routledge.
12.
CarrollL.GonzalezM. L.. 2014. “Out of Place: Racial Stereotypes and the Ecology of Frisks and Searches Following Traffic Stops.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency51(5):559‐84.
13.
ChamberlainA. W.BoggessL. N.. 2016. “Relative Difference and Burglary Location: Can Ecological Characteristics of a Burglar’s Home Neighborhood Predict Offense Location?” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency53(6):872‐906.
ClarkeR. V. G.FelsonM. (Eds) 1993. Routine Activity and Rational Choice, vol. 5. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
16.
DavisA. J.1998. “Prosecution and Race: The Power and Privilege of Discretion.” Fordham Law Review67(1):13‐68.
17.
DavisA. J.2009. Arbitrary Justice: The Power of the American Prosecutor. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
18.
DavisR. C.O'SullivanC. S.FaroleD.RempelM.. 2008. “A Comparison of Two Prosecution Policies in Cases of Intimate Partner Violence: Mandatory Case Filings Versus Following the Victim's Lead.” Criminology and Public Policy7(4):633‐62.
19.
DemuthS.2003. “Racial and Ethnic Differences in Pretrial Release Decisions and Outcomes: A Comparison of Hispanic, Black, and White Felony Arrestees.” Criminology41(3):873‐908.
20.
DixonJ.1995. “The Organizational Context of Criminal Sentencing.” American Journal of Sociology100(5):1157‐98.
21.
DonnelleyE.2022. “Neighborhoods, Criminal Incidents, Race, and Sentencing: Exploring the Racial and Social Context of Disparities in Incarceration Sentences.” The British Journal of Criminology2022(62):145‐64.
22.
DunleaR. R.2022. ““No Idea Whether He's Black, White, or Purple”: Colorblindness and Cultural Scripting in Prosecution.” Criminology60(2):237‐62.
23.
EisensteinJ.FlemmingR. B.NardulliP. F.. 1988. The Contours of Justice: Communities and Their Courts. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
24.
EitleD.D'AlessioS. J.StolzenbergL.. 2002. “Racial Threat and Social Control: A Test of the Political, Economic, and Threat of Black Crime Hypotheses.” Social Forces81(2):557‐76.
25.
EmersonR. M.1969. Judging Delinquents: Context and Process in Juvenile Court. Chicago: Aldine.
26.
ForstB.2011 “Prosecution. Chapter 15.” Pp. 437‐66 in Crime and Public Policy, edited by WilsonJ. Q.PetersiliaJ.. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
27.
FranklinT. W.2010. “Community Influence on Prosecutorial Dismissals: A Multilevel Analysis of Case-and County-Level Factors.” Journal of Criminal Justice38(4):693‐701.
28.
FrederickB.StemenD.. 2012. The anatomy of discretion: An analysis of prosecutorial decision making. Technical Report. Vera Institute of Justice.
29.
FrohmannL.1997. “Convictability and Discordant Locales: Reproducing Race, Class, and Gender Ideologies in Prosecutorial Decisionmaking.” Law and Society Review31(3):531‐56.
30.
Geller, A. and J. Fagan. 2010. “Pot as Pretext: Marijuana, Race, and the New Disorder in New York City Street Policing.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 7(4):591-633.
31.
GordonS. C.HuberG. A.. 2002. “Citizen Oversight and the Electoral Incentives of Criminal Prosecutors.” American Journal of Political Science46(2):334‐51.
32.
GreenD. P.StrolovitchD. Z.WongJ. S.. 1998. “Neighborhoods, Integration, and Racially Motivated Crime.” American Journal of Sociology104:372‐403.
33.
HawkinsD. F.1987. “Beyond Anomalies: Rethinking the Conflict Perspective on Race and Criminal Punishment.” Social Forces65(3):719‐45.
34.
HippJ. R.2016. “General Theory of Spatial Crime Patterns.” Criminology54(4):653‐79.
35.
IrwinJ.1985. The Jail: Managing the Underclass in American Society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
36.
JohnsonB. D.2006. “The Multilevel Context of Criminal Sentencing: Integrating Judge-and County-Level Influences.” Criminology44(2):259‐98.
37.
JohnsonB. D.2012. “Cross-classified Multilevel Models: An Application to the Criminal Case Processing of Indicted Terrorists.” Journal of Quantitative Criminology28(1):163‐89.
38.
JohnsonB. D.2018. “In Search of the Missing Link: Examining Contextual Variation in Federal Charge Bargains Across U.S. District Courts.” Justice Quarterly35(7):1133‐65.
39.
JohnsonB. D.KingR. D.SpohnC.. 2016. “Sociolegal Approaches to the Study of Guilty Pleas and Prosecution.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science12:479‐95.
40.
JohnsonB. D.LarrouletP.. 2019. “The “Distance Traveled”: Investigating the Downstream Consequences of Charge Reductions for Disparities in Incarceration.” Justice Quarterly36(7):1229‐57.
41.
JohnsonO.OmoriM.PetersenN.. 2023. “Racial-Ethnic Disparities in Police and Prosecutorial Drug Charging: Analyzing Organizational Overlap in Charging Patterns at Arrest, Filing, and Conviction.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency60(2):255‐99.
42.
KlingerD. A.1997. “Negotiating Order in Patrol Work: An Ecological Theory of Police Response to Deviance.” Criminology35(2):277‐306.
43.
Kohler-HausmannI.2018. Misdemeanorland. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
44.
KurlychekM. C.JohnsonB. D.. 2019. “Cumulative Disadvantage in the American Criminal Justice System.” Annual Review of Criminology2:291‐319.
45.
Kutateladze, B. L.2018. “Tracing Charge Trajectories: A Study of the Influence of Race in Charge Changes at Case Screening, Arraignment, and Disposition.” Criminology 56(1):123-153.
46.
KutateladzeB. L.AndiloroN. R.. 2014. Prosecution and racial justice in New York County. Technical report. New York: Vera Institute of Justice.
47.
KutateladzeB. L.AndiloroN. R.JohnsonB. D.. 2016. “Opening Pandora’s box: How Does Defendant Race Influence Plea Bargaining?” Justice Quarterly33(3):398‐426.
48.
KutateladzeB. L.AndiloroN. R.JohnsonB. D.SpohnC. C.. 2014. “Cumulative Disadvantage: Examining Racial and Ethnic Disparity in Prosecution and Sentencing.” Criminology52(3):514‐51.
49.
LandK. C.McCallP. L.CohenL. E.. 1990. “Structural Covariates of Homicide Rates: Are There any Invariances Across Time and Social Space?” American Journal of Sociology95(4):922‐63.
50.
LauritsenJ. L.2001. “The Social Ecology of Violent Victimization: Individual and Contextual Effects in the NCVS.” Journal of Quantitative Criminology17:3‐32.
51.
LiskaA. E.1987. “A Critical Examination of Macro Perspectives on Crime Control.” Annual Review of Sociology13(1):67‐88.
52.
LiskaA. E.ChamlinM. B.. 1984. “Social Structure and Crime Control among Macrosocial Units.” American Journal of Sociology90(2):383‐95.
53.
LongJ. S.MustilloS. A.. 2021. “Using Predictions and Marginal Effects to Compare Groups in Regression Models for Binary Outcomes.” Sociological Methods & Research50(3):1284‐320.
54.
MetcalfeC.ChiricosT.. 2018. “Race, Plea, and Charge Reduction: An Assessment of Racial Disparities in the Plea Process.” Justice Quarterly35(2):223‐53.
55.
MyersM. A.TalaricoS. M.. 1986. “The Social Contexts of Racial Discrimination in Sentencing.” Social Problems33(3):236‐51.
56.
OmoriM.2017. “Spatial Dimensions of Racial Inequality: Neighborhood Racial Characteristics and Drug Sentencing.” Race and Justice7(1):35‐58.
57.
ParkRobertBurgessErnestMcKenzieRoderick. (eds).1925. The City. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
58.
PfaffJ.2017. Locked In: The True Causes of Mass Incarceration—and how to Achieve Real Reform. New York, NY: Basic Books.
59.
RandA.1986 “Mobility Triangles.” Pp. 117‐26 in Metropolitan Crime Patterns, edited by FiglioRobertHakimSimonRengertGeorge F.. New York: Criminal Justice Press.
RhodesW. M.ConleyC.. 2008.“Crime and Mobility: An Empirical Study.” Pp. 6-11 in Principles of Geographical Offender Profiling edited by CanterDavidYoungsDonna. New York, NY: Routledge.
62.
RodriguezN.2007. “Juvenile Court Context and Detention Decisions: Reconsidering the Role of Race, Ethnicity, and Community Characteristics in Juvenile Court Processes.” Justice Quarterly24(4):629‐56.
63.
RoystonP.2004. “Multiple Imputation of Missing Values.” The Stata Journal4(3):227‐41.
64.
SampsonR. J.2012. Great American City: Chicago and the Enduring Neighborhood Effect. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
65.
ShermanL. W.GartinP. R.BuergerM. E.. 1989. “Hot Spots of Predatory Crime: Routine Activities and the Criminology of Place.” Criminology27(1):27‐56.
66.
ShermerL. O. N.JohnsonB. D.. 2010. “Criminal Prosecutions: Examining Prosecutorial Discretion and Charge Reductions in US Federal District Courts.” Justice Quarterly27(3):394‐430.
67.
SklanskyD. A.2018. “The Problems with Prosecutors.” Annual Review of Criminology1:451‐69.
68.
SmithD. A.1986. The Neighborhood Context of Police Behavior. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
69.
SmithD. A.1987. “Police Response to Interpersonal Violence: Defining the Parameters of Legal Control.” Social Forces65(3):767‐82.
70.
SmithR. J.LevinsonJ. D.. 2011. “The Impact of Implicit Racial Bias on the Exercise of Prosecutorial Discretion.” Seattle University Law Review35(3):795‐826.
71.
SpitzerS.1975. “Toward a Marxian Theory of Deviance.” Social Problems22(5):638‐51.
72.
SpohnC.2018. “Reflections on the Exercise of Prosecutorial Discretion 50 Years After Publication of the Challenge of Crime in a Free Society.” Criminology & Public Policy17(2):321‐40.
73.
SpohnC.BeichnerD.Davis-FrenzelE.. 2001. “Prosecutorial Justifications for Sexual Assault Case Rejection: Guarding the “Gateway to Justice”.” Social Problems48(2):206‐35.
74.
SpohnC.HolleranD.. 2001. “Prosecuting Sexual Assault: A Comparison of Charging Decisions in Sexual Assault Cases Involving Strangers, Acquaintances, and Intimate Partners.” Justice Quarterly18(3):651‐88.
75.
SteffensmeierD.UlmerJ.KramerJ.. 1998. “The Interaction of Race, Gender, and age in Criminal Sentencing: The Punishment Cost of Being Young, Black, and Male.” Criminology36(4):763‐98.
76.
StemenD.EscobarG.. 2018. “Whither the Prosecutor? Prosecutor and County Effects on Guilty Plea Outcomes in Wisconsin.” Justice Quarterly35(7):1166‐94.
77.
SudnowD.1965. “Normal Crimes: Sociological Features of the Penal Code in a Public Defender Office.” Social Problems12(3):255‐76.
78.
TerrillW.ReisigM. D.. 2003. “Neighborhood Context and Police use of Force.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency40(3):291‐321.
79.
TitaG.GriffithsE.. 2005. “Traveling to Violence: The Case for a Mobility-Based Spatial Typology of Homicide.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency42(3):275‐308.
80.
UlmerJ. T.2012. “Recent Developments and new Directions in Sentencing Research.” Justice Quarterly29(1):1‐40.
81.
UlmerJ. T.JohnsonB.. 2004. “Sentencing in Context: A Multilevel Analysis.” Criminology42(1):137‐78.
82.
UlmerJ. T.JohnsonB. D.. 2017. “Organizational Conformity and Punishment.” The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-)107(2):253‐92.
83.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of Policy Development & Research.2011. FY 2011 HUD Income Limits Briefing Material. Washington, DC.
84.
Van KoppenP. J.KeijserJ. W.. 1997. “Desisting Distance Decay: On the Aggregation of Individual Crime Trips.” Criminology35(3):505‐15.
85.
WacquantL.2008. “Territorial Stigmatization in the age of Advanced Marginality.” Pp. 43‐52 in Symbolic Power in Cultural Contexts. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Brill Sense.
86.
WerthmanC.PiliavinI.. 1967 “Gang Members and the Police.” Pp. 56‐98 in The Police: Six Sociological Essays, edited by BorduaD.. New York: Wiley.
87.
WhiteI. R.RoystonP.WoodA. M.. 2011. “Multiple Imputation Using Chained Equations: Issues and Guidance for Practice.” Statistics in Medicine30(4):377‐99.
88.
WilesP.CostelloA.. 2000. The ‘Road to Nowhere’: The Evidence for Travelling Criminals. Home Office Research Study 207. London: Home Office.
89.
WilliamsJ. H.RosenfeldR.. 2016. “The Impact of Neighborhood status on Imprisonment for Firearm Offenses.” Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice32(4):383‐400.
90.
WooldredgeJ.2007. “Neighborhood Effects on Felony Sentencing.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency44(2):238‐63.
91.
WooldredgeJ.FrankJ.GouletteN.. 2017. “Ecological Contributors to Disparities in Bond Amounts and Pretrial Detention.” Crime and Delinquency63(13):1682‐711.
92.
WooldredgeJ.ThistlethwaiteA.. 2004. “Bilevel Disparities in Court Dispositions for Intimate Assault.” Criminology42(2):417‐56.
93.
WrightR. F.2012. “Persistent Localism in the Prosecutor Services of North Carolina.” Crime and Justice41(1):211‐64.
94.
WrightR. F.2020. “Prosecutors and Their State and Local Polities.” The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-)110(4):823‐58.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
