Growing evidence indicates that criminologists should incorporate emotional states, such as fear, into standard deterrence frameworks. Within the fear of crime literature, there is empirical support for the “sensitivity to risk” model, which posits perceived victimization control and severity drive certainty perceptions, and these cognitions, in turn, drive fear of crime. We apply this logic to offender decision-making.
Methods:
Using a sample of young adults (N = 829), an anonymous online survey, and path analysis, this study investigates an expanded model of deterrence.
Results:
Perceived control over apprehension directly reduced perceptions of the certainty of being apprehended. Perceived severity was both directly and indirectly, through perceived certainty, associated with greater fear of apprehension. Fear of apprehension is negatively associated with reported criminal propensity, and the effects of cognitive judgments of control, severity, and certainty have an indirect effect on reported criminal propensity via fear of apprehension.
Conclusions:
Our findings illustrate the need to better understand the psychological and emotional aspects of deterrence. Individuals do not simply consult their preformed certainty perceptions when considering crime. Identifying all of the relevant cognitions and the emotions is critical for advancing criminological theories and improving crime policies.
AndersonE.1999. Code of the Street: Decency, Violence, and the Moral Life of the Inner City. New York: Norton.
2.
AnsolabehereS.SchaffnerB. F.. 2014. “Does Survey Mode Still Matter? Findings from a 2010 Multi-mode Comparison.” Political Analysis22:285–303. doi: 10.1093/pan/mpt025.
3.
AnwarS.LoughranT. A.. 2011. “Testing a Bayesian Learning Theory of Deterrence among Serious Juvenile Offenders.” Criminology49:667–98. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2011.00233.x.
4.
ApelR. 2013. “Sanctions, Perceptions, and Crime: Implications for Criminal Deterrence.” Journal of Quantitative Criminology29:67–101. doi: 10.1007/s10940-012-9170-1.
5.
BarnumT. C.SolomonS. J.. 2019. “Fight or Flight: Integral Emotions and Violent Intentions.” Criminology1–28. doi: 10.1111/1745-9125.12222.
6.
BeccariaC. [1764] 1963. On Crimes and Punishments. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
7.
BeckerG. S.1968. “Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach.” Journal of Political Economy76:169–217.
8.
BenthamJ. [1789] 1988. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
9.
BiscontiT. L.BergemanC. S.. 1999. “Perceived Social Control as a Mediator of the Relationships among Social Support, Psychological Well-being, and Perceived Health.” The Gerontologist39:94–104. doi: 10.1093/geront/39.1.94.
10.
BlanchetteI.RichardsA.. 2010. “The Influence of Affect on Higher Level Cognition: A Review of Research on Interpretation, Judgement, Decision Making and Reasoning.” Cognition and Emotion24:561–95. doi: 10.1080/02699930903132496.
11.
BouffardJ. A.ExumM. L.. 2013. “Rational Choice Beyond the Classroom: Decision Making in Offenders versus College Students.” Journal of Criminal Justice41:438–47. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2013.08.002.
12.
BreakwellG. M.2014. The Psychology of Risk. New York: Cambridge University Press.
13.
ByrneB. M.1998. Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. New York: Psychology Press.
14.
CamererC.LoewensteinG.PrelecD.. 2005. “Neuroeconomics: How Neuroscience Can Inform Economics.” Journal of Economic Literature43:9–64. doi: 10.1257/0022051053737843.
15.
ChadeeD.AustenL.DittonJ.. 2007. “The Relationship between Likelihood and Fear of Criminal Victimization: Evaluating Risk Sensitivity as a Mediating Concept.” British Journal of Criminology47:133–53. doi: 10.1093/bjc/azl025.
16.
ChemersM. M.HuL.-t.GarciaB. F.. 2001. “Academic Self-efficacy and First Year College Student Performance and Adjustment.” Journal of Educational Psychology93:55–65. doi: 10.1037//0022-0663.93.1.55.
17.
CustersK.Van den BulckJ.. 2013. “The Cultivation of Fear of Sexual Violence in Women: Processes and Moderators of the Relationship between Television and Fear.” Communication Research40:96–124. doi: 10.1177/0093650212440444.
18.
DiamantopoulosA.SiguawJ. A.. 2000. Introducing LISREL: A Guide for the Uninitiated. London, England: Sage.
19.
DunningD.2005. Self-insight: Roadblocks and Detours on the Path to Knowing Thyself. New York: Psychology Press.
20.
DurlaufS. N.NaginD. S.. 2011. “Imprisonment and Crime: Can Both Be Reduced?” Criminology & Public Policy10:13–54. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9133.2010.00680.x.
21.
EricksonM. L.GibbsJ. P.JensenG. F.. 1977. “The Deterrence Doctrine and the Perceived Certainty of Legal Punishments.” American Sociological Review42:305–17. doi: 10.2307/2094607.
22.
FarrallS.JacksonJ.GrayE.. 2009. Social Order and the Fear of Crime in Contemporary Times. New York: Oxford University Press.
23.
FarringtonD. P.1986. “Age and Crime.” Crime and Justice7:189–250. doi: 10.1086/449114.
24.
FerraroK. F.1995. Fear of Crime: Interpreting Victimization Risk. Albany: State University of New York Press.
25.
FerraroK. F.GrangeR. L.. 1987. “The Measurement of Fear of Crime.” Sociological Inquiry57:70–97. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-682X.1987.tb01181.x.
26.
FiskeS. E.TaylorS. E.. 2007. Social Cognition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
27.
GamblinB. W.WinslowM. P.LindsayB.NewsomA. W.KehnA.. 2017. “Comparing In-person, Sona, and Mechanical Turk Measurements of Three Prejudice-relevant Constructs.” Current Psychology36:217–24. doi: 10.1007/s12144-015-9403-1.
28.
GibbsJ. P.1975. Crime, Punishment, and Deterrence. New York: Elsevier.
29.
GrasmickH. G.BryjackG. J.. 1980. “The Deterrence Effect of Perceived Severity of Punishment.” Social Forces59:471–91. doi: 10.1093/sf/59.2.471.
30.
GrasmickH. G.TittleC. R.BursikR. J.ArneklevB. J.. 1993. “Testing the Core Empirical Implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s General Theory of Crime.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency30:5–29. doi: 10.1177/0022427893030001002.
31.
HirschiT.GottfredsonM.. 1983. “Age and the Explanation of Crime.” American Journal of Sociology89:552–84. doi: 10.1086/227905.
32.
HuL. t.BentlerP. M.. 1999. “Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives.” Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal6:1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118.
33.
JacksonJ.2011. “Revisiting Risk Sensitivity in the Fear of Crime.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency48:513–37. doi: 10.1177/0022427810395146.
34.
JacksonJ.2015. “Cognitive Closure and Risk Sensitivity in the Fear of Crime.” Legal and Criminological Psychology20:222–40. doi: 10.1111/lcrp.12031.
35.
JacksonJ.GousetiI.. 2016. “Threatened by Violence: Affective and Cognitive Reactions to Violent Victimization.” Journal of Interpersonal Violence31:2987–3016. doi: 10.1177/0886260515584336.
36.
JacobsB. A.CherbonneauM.. 2017. “Nerve Management and Crime Accomplishment.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency54:617–38. doi: 10.1177/0022427817693037.
37.
JonesS.2017. “Personality and Offender Decision Making: The Theoretical, Empirical, and Practical Implications for Criminology.” Pp. 181–208 in The Oxford Handbook of Offender Decision Making, edited by BernascoW.GelderJ.-L. V.ElffersH.. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
38.
KahnemanD.2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
39.
KamerdzeA. S.LoughranT.PaternosterR.SohoniT.. 2014. “The Role of Affect in Intended Rule Breaking.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency51:620–54. doi: 10.1177/0022427813519651.
40.
KronebergC.HeintzeI.MehlkopG.. 2010. “The Interplay of Moral Norms and Instrumental Incentives in Crime Causation.” Criminology48:259–94. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00187.x.
41.
LeeH.SullivanC. J.BarnesJ. C.. 2018. “Maturity of Judgment and Perceptual Deterrence.” Criminal Justice and Behavior45:1762–81. doi: 10.1177/0093854818789723.
42.
LochnerL.2007. “Individual Perceptions of the Criminal Justice System.” American Economic Review97:444–60. doi: 10.1257/aer.97.1.444.
LoughranT. A.PaternosterR.ChalfinA.WilsonT.. 2016. “Can Rational Choice Be Considered a General Theory of Crime? Evidence from Individual-level Panel Data.” Criminology54:86–112. doi: 10.1111/1745-9125.12097.
45.
LoughranT. A.PaternosterR.PiqueroA. R.FaganJ.. 2013. “‘A Good Man Always Knows His Limitations’: The Role of Overconfidence in Criminal Offending.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency50:327–58. doi: 10.1177/0022427812459649.
46.
LoughranT. A.PaternosterR.ThomasK. J.. 2014. “Incentivizing Responses to Self-Report Questions in Perceptual Deterrence Studies: An Investigation of the Validity of Deterrence Theory Using Bayesian Truth Serum.” Journal of Quantitative Criminology30:677–707. doi: 10.1007/s10940-014-9219-4.
47.
MacLeodC.CampbellL.. 1992. “Memory Accessibility and Probability Judgments: An Experimental Evaluation of the Availability Heuristic.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology63:890–902. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.63.6.890.
48.
MagaroM. M.WeiszJ. R.. 2006. “Perceived Control Mediates the Relation between Parental Rejection and Youth Depression.” Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology34:863–72. doi: 10.1007/s10802-006-9072-5.
49.
McGloinJ. M.ThomasK. J.. 2016. “Incentives for Collective Deviance: Group Size and Changes in Perceived Risk, Cost, and Reward.” Criminology54:459–86. doi: 10.1111/1745-9125.12111.
50.
MeldeC.BergM. T.EsbensenF.-A.. 2016. “Fear, Social Interactions, and Violence Mitigation.” Justice Quarterly33:481–509. doi: 10.1080/07418825.2014.928348.
51.
NaginD. S.1998. “Criminal Deterrence Research at the Outset of the Twenty-first Century.” Crime and Justice23:1–42. doi: 10.1086/449268.
52.
NaginD. S.2007. “Moving Choice to Center State in Criminological Research and Theory: The American Society of Criminology 2006 Sutherland Address.” Criminology45:259–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2007.00078.x.
53.
NaginD. S.2013. “Deterrence in the Twenty-first Century.” Crime and Justice42:199–263. doi: 10.1086/670398
54.
NaginD. S.PaternosterR.. 1993. “Enduring Individual Differences and Rational Choice Theories of Crime.” Law & Society Review27:467–96. doi: 10.2307/3054102.
55.
NaginD. S.PaternosterR.. 1994. “Personal Capital and Social Control: The Deterrence Implications of a Theory of Individual Differences in Criminal Offending.” Criminology32:581–606. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1994.tb01166.x.
PachurT.HanochY.GummerumM.. 2010. “Prospects Behind Bars: Analyzing Decisions under Risk in a Prison Population.” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review17:630–36. doi: 10.3758/pbr.17.5.630.
58.
PasekJ.2016. “When Will Nonprobability Surveys Mirror Probability Surveys? Considering Types of Inference and Weighting Strategies as Criteria for Correspondence.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research28:269–91. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/edv016.
59.
PaternosterR.2018. “Perceptual Deterrence Theory.” Pp. 81–106 in Deterrence, Choice, and Crime: Contemporary Perspectives, Vol. 23, edited by NaginD. S.CullenF. T.JonsonC. L.. New York: Routledge.
60.
PaternosterR.IovanniL.. 1986. “The Deterrent Effect of Perceived Severity: A Reexamination.” Social Forces64:751–77. doi: 10.1093/sf/64.3.751.
61.
PaternosterR.JaynesC. M.WilsonT.. 2017. “Rational Choice Theory and Interest in the ‘Fortune of Others’.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency54:847–68. doi: 10.1177/0022427817707240.
62.
PaternosterR.PogarskyG.. 2009. “Rational Choice, Agency and Thoughtfully Reflective Decision Making: The Short and Long-term Consequences of Making Good Choices.” Journal of Quantitative Criminology25:103–27. doi: 10.1007/s10940-009-9065-y.
63.
PaternosterR.SimpsonS.. 1996. “Sanction Threats and Appeals to Morality: Testing a Rational Choice Model of Corporate Crime.” Law and Society Review30:549–84. doi: 10.2307/3054128.
64.
PickettJ. T.2018. “Using Behavioral Economics to Advance Deterrence Research and Improve Crime Policy: Some Illustrative Experiments.” Crime & Delinquency64:1636–59. doi: 10.1177/0011128718763136.
65.
PickettJ. T.BushwayS. D.. 2015. “Dispositional Sources of Sanction Perceptions: Emotionality, Cognitive Style, Intolerance of Ambiguity, and Self-efficacy.” Law and Human Behavior39:624–40. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000150.
66.
PickettJ. T.RocheS. P.. 2016. “Arrested Development: Misguided Directions in Deterrence Theory and Policy.” Criminology & Public Policy15:727–51. doi: 10.1111/1745-9133.12217.
67.
PickettJ. T.RocheS. P.PogarskyG.. 2018. “Toward a Bifurcated Theory of Emotional Deterrence.” Criminology56:27–58. doi: 10.1111/1745-9125.12153.
68.
PiqueroA. R.PaternosterR.PogarskyG.LoughranT.. 2011. “Elaborating the Individual Difference Component in Deterrence Theory.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science7:335–60. doi: 10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102510-105404.
69.
PogarskyG.2002. “Identifying “Deterrable” Offenders: Implications for Research on Deterrence.” Justice Quarterly19:431–52. doi: 10.1080/07418820200095301.
70.
PogarskyG.LoughranT. A.. 2016. “The Policy-to-perceptions Link in Deterrence.” Criminology & Public Policy15:777–90. doi: 10.1111/1745-9133.12241.
71.
PogarskyG.PiqueroA. R.PaternosterR.. 2004. “Modeling Change in Perception about Sanction Threats: The Neglected Linkage in Deterrence Theory.” Journal of Quantitative Criminology20:343–69. doi: 10.1007/s10940-004-5868-z.
72.
PogarskyG.RocheS. P.PickettJ. T.. 2017. “Heuristics and Biases, Rational Choice, and Sanction Perceptions.” Criminology55:85–111. doi: 10.1111/1745-9125.12129.
73.
PogarskyG.RocheS. P.PickettJ. T.. 2018. “Offender Decision-making in Criminology: Contributions from Behavioral Economics.” Annual Review of Criminology1:379–400. doi: 10.1146/annurev-criminol-032317-092036.
74.
PrattT. C.CullenF. T.BlevinsK. R.DaigleL. E.MadensenT. D.. 2006. “The Empirical Status of Deterrence Theory: A Meta-analysis.” Taking Stock: The Status of Criminological Theory15:367–96.
75.
RolisonJ. J.HanochY.GummerumM.. 2013. “When Opportunity Matters: Comparing the Risk-taking Attitudes of Prisoners and Recently Released Ex-prisoners.” Risk Analysis33:2013–22. doi: 10.1111/risa.12042.
76.
RountreeP. W.LandK. C.. 1996. “Perceived Risk versus Fear of Crime: Empirical Evidence of Conceptually Distinct Reactions in Survey Data.” Social Forces74:1353–76. doi: 10.1093/sf/74.4.1353.
77.
RutterD. R.QuineL.AlberyI. P.. 1998. “Perceptions of Risk in Motorcyclists: Unrealistic Optimism, Relative Realism and Predictions of Behaviour.” British Journal of Psychology89:681–96. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1998.tb02710.x.
78.
SaltzmanL.PaternosterR.WaldoG. P.ChiricosT. G.. 1982. “Deterrent and Experiential Effects: The Problem of Causal Order in Perceptual Deterrence Research.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency19:172–89. doi: 10.1177/002242788201900203.
79.
SlovicP.2016. The Perception of Risk. New York: Routledge.
80.
SlovicP.FinucaneM. L.PetersE.MacGregorD. G.. 2004. “Risk as Analysis and Risk as Feelings: Some Thoughts about Affect, Reason, Risk, and Rationality.” Risk Analysis24:311–22. doi: 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00433.x.
81.
SobelM. E.1987. “Direct and Indirect Effects in Linear Structural Equation Models.” Sociological Methods & Research16:155–76. doi: 10.1177/0049124187016001006.
82.
StaffordM. C.WarrM.. 1993. “A Reconceptualization of General and Specific Deterrence.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency30:123–35. doi: 10.1177/0022427893030002001.
83.
ThalerR. H.2015. Misbehaving: The Making of Behavioral Economics. New York: W. W. Norton.
84.
ThomasK. J.HamiltonB. C.LoughranT. A.. 2018. “Testing the Transitivity of Reported Risk Perceptions: Evidence of Coherent Arbitrariness.” Criminology56:59–86. doi: 10.1111/1745-9125.12154.
85.
ThomasK. J.LoughranT. A.PiqueroA. R.. 2013. “Do Individual Characteristics Explain Variation in Sanction Risk Updating among Serious Juvenile Offenders? Advancing the Logic of Differential Deterrence.” Law and Human Behavior37:10. doi: 10.1037/h0093990.
86.
ThomasK. J.McGloinJ. M.. 2013. “A Dual-systems Approach for Understanding Differential Susceptibility to Processes of Peer Influence.” Criminology51:435–74. doi: 10.1111/1745-9125.12010.
87.
ThornberryT. P.KrohnM. D.. 2000. “The Self-report Method for Measuring Delinquency and Crime.” Pp. 33–83 in Criminal Justice: Measurement and Analysis of Crime and Justice, Vol. 4, edited by DuffeeD.CrutchfieldR.MastrofskiS.MazerolleL.McDowallD.. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
88.
TourangeauR.ConradF. G.CouperM. P.. 2013. The Science of Web Surveys. New York: Oxford University Press.
89.
TverskyA.KahnemanD.. 1973. “Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability.” Cognitive Psychology5:207–32. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9.
90.
TverskyA.KahnemanD.. 1974. “Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.” Science185:1124–31. doi: 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124.
91.
van GelderJ.-L.2013. “Beyond Rational Choice: The Hot/Cool Perspective of Criminal Decision Making.” Psychology, Crime & Law19:745–63. doi: 10.1080/1068316X.2012.660153.
92.
van GelderJ.-L.de VriesR. E.. 2012. “Traits and States: Integrating Personality and Affect into a Model of Criminal Decision Making.” Criminology50:637–71. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2012.00276.x.
93.
van GelderJ.-L.de VriesR. E.. 2014. “Rational Misbehavior? Evaluating an Integrated Dual-process Model of Criminal Decision Making.” Journal of Quantitative Criminology30:1–27. doi: 10.1007/s10940-012-9192-8.
94.
van GelderJ.-L.de VriesR. E.DemetriouA.van SintemaartensdijkI.DonkerT.. 2019. “The Virtual Reality Scenario Method: Moving from Imagination to Immersion in Criminal Decision-making Research.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency56:451–80. doi: 10.1177/0022427818819696.
95.
van GelderJ.-L.NeeC.OtteM.DemetriouA.van SintemaartensdijkI.van ProoijenJ.-W.. 2017. “Virtual Burglary: Exploring the Potential of Virtual Reality to Study Burglary in Action.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency54:29–62. doi: 10.1177/0022427816663997.
96.
VanderWeeleT. J.2015. Explanation in Causal Inference: Methods for Mediation and Interaction. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
97.
VollaardB.2013. “Preventing Crime through Selective Incapacitation.” The Economic Journal123:262–84. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2012.02522.x.
98.
WarrM.1980. “The Accuracy of Public Beliefs about Crime.” Social Forces59:456–70. doi: 10.1093/sf/59.2.456.
99.
WarrM.1987. “Fear of Victimization and Sensitivity to Risk.” Journal of Quantitative Criminology3:29–46. doi: 10.1007/bf01065199.
100.
WarrM.2000. “Fear of Crime in the United States: Avenues for Research and Policy.” Pp. 451–89 in Criminal Justice 2000: Measurement and Analysis of Crime and Justice, Vol. 4, edited by DuffeeD.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
101.
WarrM.2016. “Crime and Regret.” Emotion Review8:231–39. doi: 10.1177/1754073915586818.
102.
WarrM.StaffordM. C.. 1983. “Fear of Victimization: A Look at the Proximate Causes.” Social Forces61:1033–43. doi: 10.1093/sf/61.4.1033.
103.
WikströmP.-O. H.OberwittlerD.TreiberK.HardieB.. 2012. Breaking Rules: The Social and Situational Dynamics of Young People’s Urban Crime. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
104.
WikströmP.-O. H.TseloniA.KarlisD.. 2011. “Do People Comply with the Law Because They Fear Getting Caught?” European Journal of Criminology8:401–20. doi: 10.1177/1477370811416415.
105.
WilsonT.PaternosterR.LoughranT.. 2017. “Direct and Indirect Experiential Effects in an Updating Model of Deterrence: A Research Note.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency54:63–77. doi: 10.1177/0022427816664119.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
