To estimate the effects of three types of responses to intimate partner violence: (1) reporting of crime to the police, (2) arresting the suspect, and (3) receiving services from agencies other than the police that assist victims of crime.
Methods:
We obtained a nationally representative sample of 2,221 victims, using longitudinal records from the area-identified National Crime Victimization Survey from 1996 through 2012. To reduce the threat of nonrandom selection into treatment, we estimated effects using propensity score matched and weighted survival analysis.
Results:
Victims’ probability of repeat victimization is not related to arrest (hazard ratio, 0.87; 95 percent confidence interval [CI], 0.55 to 1.40; p = .57). In contrast, the reporting of crime to the police is associated with a 34 percent reduction in the risk of repeat victimization (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95 percent CI, 0.53 to 0.82; p < .001), and the use of victim services is associated with a 40 percent reduction in the risk of repeat victimization (hazard ratio, 0.60; 95 percent CI, 0.44 to 0.83; p < .01).
Conclusions:
The results support a model in which the deterrent effect of arrest is not substantively important, but police notification and victim-centered services produce important reductions in repeat victimization.
ApelRobert J.SweetenGary. 2010. “Propensity Score Matching in Criminology and Criminal Justice.” Pp. 543–62 in Handbook of Quantitative Criminology, edited byPiqueroAlexis RussellWeisburdDavid. New York: Springer.
2.
AustinPeter C.2013. “The Performance of Different Propensity Score Methods for Estimating Marginal Hazard Ratios.” Statistics in Medicine32:2837–49.
3.
BachmanRonet. 1998. “The Factors Related to Rape Reporting Behavior and Arrest: New Evidence from the National Crime Victimization Survey.” Criminal Justice and Behavior25:8–29.
4.
BaumerEric P.LauritsenJanet L.. 2010. “Reporting Crime to the Police, 1973–2005: A Multivariate Analysis of Long-Term Trends in the National Crime Survey (NCS) and National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS).” Criminology48:131–85.
5.
BellMargret E.GoodmanLisa A.. 2001. “Supporting Battered Women Involved with the Court System: An Evaluation of a Law School-based Advocacy Intervention.” Violence Against Women7:1377–404.
6.
BennettLarryRigerStephanieSchewePaulHowardAprilWascoSharon. 2004. “Effectiveness of Hotline, Advocacy, Counseling, and Shelter Services for Victims of Domestic Violence: A Statewide Evaluation.” Journal of Interpersonal Violence19:815–29.
7.
BensonSara R.2009. “Failure to Arrest: A Pilot Study of Police Response to Domestic Violence in Rural Illinois.” Journal of Gender, Social Policy and the Law17:685–703.
8.
BerkRichard A.CampbellAlecKlapRuthWesternBruce. 1992. “A Bayesian Analysis of the Colorado Springs Spouse Abuse Experiment.” Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology83:170–200.
9.
BerkRichard A.NewtonPhyllis J.BerkSarah Fenstermaker. 1986. “What a Difference a Day Makes: An Empirical Study of the Impact of Shelters for Battered Women.” Journal of Marriage and Family48:481–90.
10.
BlackMichele C.BasileKathleen C.BreidingMatthew J.SmithSharon G.WaltersMikel L.MerrickMelissa T.StevensM. R.. 2011. National intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey: 2010 Summary Report. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
11.
BrickmanEllen. 2003. Development of a National Study of Victim Needs and Assistance. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
12.
BJS (Bureau of Justice Statistics). 2015. Number of violent victimizations by victim-offender relationship and reporting to the police, 1993-2014. Table generated using the NCVS Victimization Analysis Tool. Retrieved November 6, 2015 (www.bjs.gov).
13.
BuzawaEve S.BuzawaCarl G.. 1993. “Opening the Doors: The Changing Police Response to Domestic Violence.” Pp. 551–67 in Critical Issues in Policing, edited byDunhamRoger G.AlpertGeoffrey P.. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
14.
BybeeDeborah I.SullivanCris M.. 2002. “The Process through Which An Advocacy Intervention Resulted in Positive Change for Battered Women over Time.” American Journal of Community Psychology30:103–32.
15.
Chesney-LindMeda. 2002. “Criminalizing Victimization: The Unintended Consequences of Pro-arrest Policies for Girls and Women.” Criminology and Public Policy2:81–90.
16.
CorsillesAngela. 1994. “No-drop Policies in the Prosecution of Domestic Violence Cases: Guarantee to Action or Dangerous Solution.” Fordham Law Review63:853–81.
17.
CunradiCarol B.CaetanoRaulClarkCatherineSchaferJohn. 2000. “Neighborhood Poverty as a Predictor of Intimate Partner Violence among White, Black, and Hispanic Couples in the United States: A Multilevel Analysis.” Annals of Epidemiology10:297–308.
18.
DavisRobert C.LurigioArthur J.SkoganWesley G.. 1999. “Services for Victims: A Market Research Study.” International Review of Victimology6:101–15.
19.
DavisRobert C.SmithBarbara. 1995. “Domestic Violence Reforms: Empty Promises or Fulfilled Expectations?” Crime and Delinquency41:541–52.
20.
DavisRobertWeisburdDavidTaylorBruce. 2008. Effects of Second Responder Programs on Repeat Incidents of Family Abuse: A Systematic Review. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
21.
DiPreteThomas A.GanglMarkus. 2004. “Assessing Bias in the Estimation of Causal Effects: Rosenbaum Bounds on Matching Estimators and Instrumental Variables Estimation with Imperfect Instruments.” Sociological Methodology34:271–310.
22.
DobashR. EmersonDobashRussell P.. 2000. “Evaluating Criminal Justice Interventions for Domestic Violence.” Crime and Delinquency46:252–70.
23.
DuganLauraNaginDaniel S.RosenfeldRichard. 1999. “Explaining the Decline in Intimate Partner Homicide: The Effects of Changing Domesticity, Women’s Status, and Domestic Violence Resources.” Homicide Studies3:187–214.
24.
DuGoffEva H.SchulerMeganStuartElizabeth A.. 2014. “Generalizing Observational Study Results: Applying Propensity Score Methods to Complex Surveys.” Health Services Research49:284–303.
25.
DunfordFranklyn W.HuizingaDavidElliottDelbert S.. 1990. “Role of Arrest in Domestic Assault: The Omaha Police Experiment.” Criminology28:183–206.
26.
EckJohn E.MaguireEdward R.. 2006. “Have Changes in Policing Reduced Violent Crime? An Assessment of the Evidence.” Pp. 207–28 in The Crime Drop in America, edited byBlumsteinAlfredFarringtonDavid P.. New York: Cambridge University Press.
27.
EckhardtChristopher I.MurphyChristopher M.WhitakerDaniel J.SprungerJoelDykstraRitaWoodardKim. 2013. “The Effectiveness of Intervention Programs for Perpetrators and Victims of Intimate Partner Violence.” Partner Abuse4:196–231.
28.
EnglebrechtChristine M.2011. “The Struggle for ‘Ownership of Conflict’: An Exploration of Victim Participation and Voice in the Criminal Justice System.” Criminal Justice Review36:129–51.
FelsonRichard B.AckermanJeffrey M.GallagherCatherine A.. 2005. “Police Intervention and the Repeat of Domestic Assault.” Criminology43:563–88.
31.
FelsonRichard B.MessnerSteven F.HoskinAnthony W.DeaneGlenn. 2002. “Reasons for Reporting and Not Reporting Domestic Violence to the Police.” Criminology40:617–48.
32.
GarnerJoelFaganJeffreyMaxwellChristopher. 1995. “Published Findings from the Spouse Assault Replication Program: A Critical Review.” Journal of Quantitative Criminology11:3–28.
33.
GarnerJoel H.MaxwellChristopher D.. 2008. “Coordinated Community Responses to Intimate Partner Violence in the 20th and 21st Centuries.” Criminology and Public Policy7:525–35.
34.
GayatEtienneResche-RigonMatthieuMaryJean-YvesPorcherRaphaël. 2012. “Propensity Score Applied to Survival Data Analysis through Proportional Hazards Models: A Monte Carlo Study.” Pharmaceutical Statistics11:222–29.
35.
GoodmanLisaDuttonMary AnnVankosNatalieWeinfurtKevin. 2005. “Women’s Resources and Use of Strategies as Risk and Protective Factors for Reabuse over Time.” Violence Against Women11:311–36.
36.
GoudriaanHeikeLynchJames P.NieuwbeertaPaul. 2004. “Reporting to the Police in Western Nations: A Theoretical Analysis of the Effects of Social Context.” Justice Quarterly21:933–69.
37.
GreenspanRosannWeisburdDavidLaneErinReadyJustinCrossen-PowellSheilaBoothWilliam C.. 2005. Richmond’s Second Responders: Partnering with Police Against Domestic Violence. Washington, DC: Police Foundation.
38.
HartTimothy C.RennisonCallie Marie. 2003. Reporting Crime to the Police, 1992-2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
39.
HippJohn R.2010. “The Role of Crime in Housing Unit Racial/Ethnic Transition.” Criminology48:683–723.
40.
HirschelDavidBuzawaEvePattavinaAprilFaggianiDonReulandMelissa. 2007. Explaining the Prevalence, Context, and Consequences of Dual Arrest in Intimate Partner Cases: Final Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
41.
HirschelJ. DavidHutchisonIra W.DeanCharles W.. 1992. “The Failure of Arrest to Deter Spouse Abuse.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency29:7–33.
42.
HoctorMachaela M.1997. “Domestic Violence as a Crime against the State: The Need for Mandatory Arrest in California.” California Law Review85:643–700.
43.
HolmesMalcolm D.2000. “Minority Threat and Police Brutality: Determinants of Civil Rights Criminal Complaints in US Municipalities.” Criminology38:343–68.
HovellMelbourne F.SeidArlene G.LilesSandy. 2006. “Evaluation of a Police and Social Services Domestic Violence Program: Empirical Evidence Needed to Inform Public Health Policies.” Violence Against Women12:137–59.
46.
HoyleCarolynSandersAndrew. 2000. “Police Response to Domestic Violence.” British Journal of Criminology40:14–36.
47.
ImbensGuido W.2000. “The Role of the Propensity Score in Estimating Dose-response Functions.” Biometrika87:706–10.
48.
IyengarRadha. 2009. “Does the Certainty of Arrest Reduce Domestic Violence? Evidence from Mandatory and Recommended Arrest Laws.” Journal of Public Economics93:85–98.
49.
JonesDana A.BelknapJoanne. 1999. “Police Responses to Battering in a Progressive Pro-arrest Jurisdiction.” Justice Quarterly16:249–73.
50.
LauritsenJanet L.OwensJennifer GatewoodPlantyMichaelRandMichael R.TrumanJennifer L.. 2012. Methods for Counting High-frequency Repeat Victimizations in the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCJ-237308). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
51.
LittleRoderick J. A.1992. “Regression with Missing X’s: A Review.” Journal of the American Statistical Association87:1227–37.
LynchJames P.AddingtonLynn A., eds. 2006. Understanding Crime Statistics: Revisiting the Divergence of the NCVS and the UCR. New York: Cambridge University Press.
54.
MacyRebecca J.GiattinaMary C.MontijoNatalie JohnsErmentroutDania M.. 2010. “Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault Agency Directors’ Perspectives on Services that Help Survivors.” Violence Against Women16:1138–61.
55.
MasseyDouglas S.DentonNancy A.. 1988. “The Dimensions of Residential Segregation.” Social Forces67:281–315.
56.
MaxwellChristopher D.GarnerJoel H.FaganJeffrey A.. 2002. “The Preventative Effects of Arrest on Intimate Partner Violence: Research, Policy and Theory.” Criminology and Public Policy2:51–80.
57.
McCaffreyDaniel F.GriffinBeth AnnAlmirallDanielSlaughterMary EllenRamchandRajeevBurgetteLane F.. 2013. “A Tutorial on Propensity Score Estimation for Multiple Treatments Using Generalized Boosted Models.” Statistics in Medicine32:3388–414.
58.
McFarlaneJudithParkerBarbaraSoekenKarenSilvaConnieReelSally. 1998. “Safety Behaviors of Abused Women after an Intervention during Pregnancy.” Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing27:64–69.
59.
National Network to End Domestic Violence. 2015. Domestic Violence Counts 2014: A 24-Hour Census of Domestic Violence Shelters and Services. Washington, DC: National Network to End Domestic Violence.
60.
NewmarkLisaBondermanJudySmithBarbaraLinerBlaine. 2003. The National Evaluation of State VOCA Assistance and Compensation Programs: Trends and Strategies for the Future. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
61.
OVC (Office for Victims of Crime). 1998. New Directions from the Field: Victims’ Rights and Services for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: Office for Victims of Crime.
62.
PateAnthony M.HamiltonEdwin E.. 1992. “Formal and Informal Deterrents to Domestic Violence: The Dade County Spouse Assault Experiment.” American Sociological Review57:691–97.
RosenbaumPaul R.2002. Observational Studies. 2nd Ed. New York: Springer.
65.
RosenbaumPaul R.RubinDonald B.. 1983. “The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects.” Biometrika70:41–55.
66.
RubinDonald B.2001. “Using Propensity Scores to Help Design Observational Studies: Application to the Tobacco Litigation.” Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology2:169–88.
67.
ShermanLawrence W.BerkRichard A.. 1984. “The Specific Deterrence Effect of Arrest for Domestic Assault.” American Sociological Review49:261–72.
68.
ShermanLawrence W.SchmidtJanell D.RoganDennis P.SmithDouglas A.GartinPatrick R.CohnEllen G.CollinsJ.BacichAnthony R.. 1992. “The Variable Effects of Arrest on Criminal Careers: The Milwaukee Domestic Violence Experiment.” The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology83:137–69.
69.
ShermanLawrence W.SmithDouglas A.SchmidtJanell D.RoganDennis P.. 1992. “Crime, Punishment, and Stake in Conformity: Legal and Informal Control of Domestic Violence.” American Sociological Review57:680–90.
70.
SimmonsCatherine A.FarrarMelissaFrazerKittyThompsonMary Jane. 2011. “From the Voices of Women: Facilitating Survivor Access to IPV Services.” Violence Against Women17:1226–43.
71.
SimsBarbaraYostBerwoodAbbottChristina. 2005. “Use and Nonuse of Victim Services Programs: Implications from a Statewide Survey of Crime Victims.” Criminology and Public Policy4:361–84.
72.
SkoganWesley G.DavisRobert C.LurigioArthur J.. 1990. Victims’ Needs and Victim Services. Final report to the National Institute of Justice. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
73.
SmithDouglas A.1986. “The Neighborhood Context of Police Behavior.” Crime and Justice8:313–41.
74.
SugarmanDavid B.Boney-McCoySue. 2000. “Research Synthesis in Family Violence: The Art of Reviewing Research.” Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment and Trauma4:55–82.
75.
SullivanCris M.2011. “Evaluating Domestic Violence Support Service Programs: Waste of Time, Necessary Evil, or Opportunity for Growth?” Aggression and Violent Behavior16:354–60.
76.
SullivanCris M.BybeeDeborah I.. 1999. “Reducing Violence Using Community-Based Advocacy for Women with Abusive Partners.” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology67:43–53.
77.
SullivanCris M.BybeeDeborah I.AllenNicole E.. 2002. “Findings from a Community-based Program for Battered Women and Their Children.” Journal of Interpersonal Violence17:915–36.
78.
TjadenPatriciaThoennesNancy. 2000. Full Report of the Prevalence, Incidence and Consequences of Violence Against Women. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
79.
TuttyLeslie M.BidgoodBruce A.RotheryMichael A.. 1993. “Support Groups for Battered Women: Research on their Efficacy.” Journal of Family Violence8:325–43.
80.
VisherChristy A.HarrellAdeleNewmarkLisaYahnerJennifer. 2008. “Reducing Intimate Partner Violence: An Evaluation of a Comprehensive Justice System-community Collaboration.” Criminology and Public Policy7:495–523.
81.
WathenC. NadineMacMillanHarriet L.. 2003. “Interventions for Violence Against Women: Scientific Review.” Journal of the American Medical Association289:589–600.
82.
WrightEmily M.BensonMichael L.. 2011. “Clarifying the Effects of Neighborhood Context on Violence ‘Behind Closed Doors.’” Justice Quarterly28:775–98.
83.
XieMinLauritsenJanet L.HeimerKaren. 2012. “Intimate Partner Violence in Major Metropolitan Areas: The Contextual Influences of Police and Social Services.” Criminology50:961–92.
84.
XieMinMcDowallDavid. 2014. “Impact of Victimization on Residential Mobility: Explaining Racial and Ethnic Patterns using the National Crime Victimization Survey.” Criminology52:553–87.
85.
ZelcerAmy M.2014. “Battling Domestic Violence: Replacing Mandatory Arrest Laws with a Trifecta of Preferential Arrest, Officer Education, and Batterer Treatment Programs.” American Criminal Law Review51:541–61.
86.
ZweigJanine M.BurtMartha R.. 2003. The Effects on Victims of Victim Service Programs Funded by the STOP Formula Grants Program. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
