When Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency was first published, criminology was in the midst of an important research stream on the measurement of offending. This never solidified into a strong subdiscipline akin to psychometrics, however. After briefly discussing the goals of measurement and how they correspond to the explanation of criminal events and behavior, the authors consider how the prevailing methodological paradigm, which relies heavily on analysis of a limited number of data sets via variable-based regression techniques, may constrain measurement progress on the whole. In doing so, they highlight the imbalance between the growing sophistication of analytic models and the relative stagnation of the employed data sets and measures. The article then provides some examples of exceptions to this broad trend—both in terms of data collection and measurement techniques. Finally, the authors consider basic lessons drawn from these innovative approaches to measurement.
AbbottAndrew. 1997. “Of Time and Space: The Contemporary Relevance of the Chicago School.”Social Forces75:1149–82.
2.
AgnewRobert. 2005. Why Do Criminals Offend? A General Theory of Crime and Delinquency. Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury.
3.
AnselinLucCohenJacquelineCookDavidGorrWilpenTitaGeorge. 2000. “Spatial Analysis of Crime.” Pp. 213–62 in Measurement and Analysis of Crime and Justice, Vol. 4, edited by DuffeeDavid. Washington, DC: Office of Justice Programs.
4.
ArmstrongTodd A.LeeDaniel R.ArmstrongGaylene S.. 2009. “An Assessment of Scales Measuring Constructs in Tests of Criminological Theory Based on National Youth Survey Data.”Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency46:73–105.
5.
BernardThomas J. 1990. “Twenty Years of Testing Theories: What Have We Learned and Why?Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency27:325–47.
6.
BersaniBianca E. In press. “An Examination of First and Second Generation Immigrant Offending Trajectories.”Forthcoming in Justice Quarterly. doi:10.1080/07418825.2012.659200.
7.
BersaniBianca E.DohertyElaine Eggleston. 2013. “When the Ties that Bind Unwind: Examining the Enduring and Situational Processes of Change Behind the Marriage Effect.”Criminology51:399–433.
8.
BlumsteinAlfredCohenJacquelineDasSomanthMoitraSouymyo D.. 1988. “Specialization and Seriousness during Adult Criminal Careers.”Journal of Quantitative Criminology4:303–45.
9.
BomanJohn H.StognerJohn M.MillerBryan LeeHayden GriffinO.KrohnMarvin D.. 2012. “On the Operational Validity of Perceptual Peer Delinquency: Exploring Projection and Elements Contained in Perceptions.”Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency49:601–21.
10.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. 1989. Redesign of the National Crime Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice. Retrieved August 15, 2013 (http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/rncs.pdf).
11.
BushwayShawnApelRobert. 2010. “Instrumental Variables in Criminology and Criminal Justice.” Pp. 595–604 in Handbook of Quantitative Criminology, edited by PiqueroAlex R.WeisburdDavid. New York: Springer.
12.
CantorDavidLynchJames P.. 2000. “Self-report Surveys as Measures of Crime and Criminal Victimization.” Pp. 85–138 in Measurement and Analysis of Crime and Justice, Vol. 4, edited by DuffeeDavid. Washington, DC: Office of Justice Programs.
13.
ClarkePhilippaAilshireJenniferMelendezRobertBaderMichaelMorenoffJeff. 2010. “Using Google Earth to Conduct a Neighborhood Audit: Reliability of a Virtual Audit Instrument.”Health and Place16:1224–29.
14.
CochranWilliam G.1968. “Errors of Measurement in Statistics.”Technometrics10:637–66.
15.
CookThomasCampbellDonald T.. 1979. Quasi-experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
16.
CronbachLeeMeehlPaul E.. 1955. “Construct Validity in Psychological Tests.”Psychological Bulletin52:281–302.
17.
CullenFrancis T.GendreauPaulRoger JarjouraG.WrightJohn Paul. 1997. “Crime and The Bell Curve: Lessons from Intelligent Criminology.”Crime & Delinquency43:387–411.
18.
Delaney-BlackVirginiaChiodoLisa M.HanniganJohn H.GreenwaldMark K.JanisseJamesPattersonGraceHuestisMarilyn A.AgerJoelSokolRobert J.. 2010. “Just Say ‘I Don’t’: Lack of Concordance between Teen Report and Biological Measures of Drug Use.”Pediatrics126:887–93.
19.
DeVellisRobert F.2003. Scale Development: Theory and Applications. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
DodgeR. W.TurnerA. G.. 1981. “Methodological Foundations for Establishing a National Survey of Victimization.” Pp. 2–6 in The National Crime Survey: Working Papers, vol. 1: Current and Historical Perspectives, edited by LehnenRobert G.SkoganWesley G.. Ncj 75374. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
21.
EckJohn E.ChaineySpencerCameronJames G.LeitnerMichaelWilsonRonald E.. 2005. Mapping Crime: Understanding Hotspots. Washington, DC: Office of Justice Programs.
22.
ElliottDelbert S.AgetonSusan S.. 1980. “Reconciling Race and Class Differences in Self-reported and Official Estimates of Delinquency.”American Sociological Review45:95–110.
23.
EvansSandra S.ScottJoseph E.. 1984. “Effects of Item Order on the Perceived Seriousness of Crime: A Reexamination.”Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency21:139–51.
24.
FarnworthMargaretThornberryTerrence P.KrohnMarvin D.LizotteAllan J.. 1994. “Measurement in the Study of Class and Delinquency: Integrating Theory and Research.”Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency31:32–61.
25.
FarringtonDavid P.SnyderHoward N.FinneganTerrence A.. 1988. “Specialization in Juvenile Court Careers.”Criminology26:461–85.
26.
FerraroKenneth F.1995. Fear of Crime: Interpreting Victimization Risk. Albany, NY: Suny Press.
27.
FerraroKenneth F.LaGrangeRandy. 1987. “The Measurement of Fear of Crime.”Sociological Inquiry57:70–97.
28.
GarofaloJames. 1979. “Victimization and the Fear of Crime.”Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency16:80–97.
29.
GoldMartin. 1966. “Undetected Delinquent Behavior.”Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency3:27–46.
30.
GrasmickHarold G.TittleCharles R.BursikRobert J.Jr.ArneklevBruce J.. 1993. “Testing the Core Empirical Implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s General Theory of Crime.”Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency30:5–29.
31.
HardtRobertPetersen-HardtSusan. 1977. “On Determining the Quality of the Delinquency Self-report Method.”Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency14:247–61.
32.
HarperCynthia C.MclanahanSara S.. 2004. “Father Absence and Youth Incarceration.”Journal of Research on Adolescence14:369–97.
33.
HarrisonLana D.MartinSteven S.EnevTihomirHarringtonDeborah. 2007. Comparing Drug Testing and Self-report of Drug Use among Youths and Young Adults in the General Population. DHHS Publication No. SMA 07–4249, Methodology Series. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Studies. Retrieved August 15, 2013 (http://oas.samhsa.gov/validity/drugTest.pdf).
34.
HaynieDana L.2001. “Delinquent Peers Revisited: Does Network Structure Matter?”American Journal of Sociology106:1013–57.
35.
HaynieDana L.OsgoodD. Wayne. 2005. “Reconsidering Peers and Delinquency: How Do Peers Matter?”Social Forces84:1109–30.
36.
HerrnsteinRichard J.MurrayCharles. 1994. Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life. New York: Free Press.
37.
HindelangMichael J.1976. Criminal Victimization in Eight American Cities: A Descriptive Analysis of Common Theft and Assault. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing.
38.
HindelangMichael J.HirschiTravisWeisJoseph G.. 1981. Measuring Delinquency. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
39.
HirschiTravis. 1969. Causes of Delinquency. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
40.
HirschiTravisGottfredsonMichael. 1993. “Commentary: Testing the General Theory of Crime.”Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency30:47–54.
41.
HorneyJulie. 2001. “Criminal Events and Criminal Careers: An Integrative Approach to the Study of Violence.” Pp. 141–68 in The Process and Structure of Crime, edited by MeierRobert F.KennedyLeslie W.SaccoVincent F.. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
42.
HorneyJulieMarshallIneke Haen. 1992. “An Experimental Comparison of Two Self-report Methods for Measuring Lambda.”Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency29:102–21.
43.
HuizingaDavidElliottDelbert S.. 1986. “Reassessing the Reliability and Validity of Self-report Delinquency Measures.”Journal of Quantitative Criminology2:293–327.
44.
KatzRebecca S.2000. “Explaining Girls’ and Women’s Crime and Desistance in the Context of their Victimization Experiences: A Developmental Test of Revised Strain Theory and the Life Course Perspective.”Violence Against Women6:633–60.
45.
KeaneCarlMaximPaul S.TeevanJames J.. 1993. “Drinking and Driving, Self-control, and Gender: Testing a General Theory of Crime.”Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency30:30–46.
46.
KiecoltK. JillNathanLaura E.. 1985. Secondary Analysis of Survey Data. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
47.
KimJulia Yun SooFendrichMichaelWislarJoseph S.. 2000. “The Validity of Juvenile Arrestees’ Drug Use Reporting: A Gender Comparison.”Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency37:419–32.
48.
LaubJohn H.SampsonRobert J.. 1998. “Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Data.” Pp. 213–30 in Methods of Life Course Research, edited by GieleJanet Z.ElderGlen H.. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
49.
LaubJohn H.SampsonRobert J.. 2003. Shared Beginnings, Divergent Lives: Delinquent Boys to Age Seventy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
50.
LochnerLance. 2007. “Individual Perceptions of the Criminal Justice System.”American Economic Review97:444–60.
51.
MaltzMichael D.1994. “Deviating from the Mean: The Declining Significance of Significance.”Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency31:434–63.
52.
MaltzMichael D.1998. “Visualizing Homicide: A Research Note.”Journal of Quantitative Criminology14:397–410.
53.
MaltzMichael D.MullanyJacqueline M.. 2000. “Visualizing Lives: New Pathways for Analyzing Life Course Trajectories.”Journal of Quantitative Criminology16:255–81.
54.
ManskiCharles F. 1993. “Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem.”Review of Economic Studies60:531–42.
55.
MarunaShadd. 2010. “Mixed Methods Research in Criminology: Why Not Go Both Ways?” Pp. 123–40 in Handbook of Quantitative Criminology, edited by WeisburdDavidPiqueroAlex R.. New York: Springer.
56.
McGloinJean M.SullivanChristopher J.PiqueroAlex R.PrattTravis C.. 2007. “Local Life Circumstances and Offending Specialization/Versatility: Comparing Opportunity and Propensity Models.”Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency44:321–46.
57.
MillerJody. 2009. “The Status of Qualitative Research in Criminology.” Pp. 69–75 in National Science Foundation Workshop on Interdisciplinary Standards for Systematic Qualitative Research: Cultural Anthropology, Law and Social Science, Political Science, and Sociology Programs, edited by LamontMicheleWhitePatricia. Washington DC: National Science Foundation.
58.
MoffittTerrie E.1993. “Adolescence-limited and Life-course-persistent Antisocial Behavior: A Developmental Taxonomy.”Psychological Review100:674–701.
59.
MorrisNancySlocumLee Ann. 2010. “The Validity of Self-reported Prevalence, Frequency, and Timing of Arrest: An Evaluation of Data Collected Using a Life Event Calendar.”Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency47:210–40.
60.
NaginDaniel S.2005. Group-based Modeling of Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.
61.
OsgoodD. WayneMcMorrisBarbaraPotenzaMaria. 2002. “Analyzing Multiple-item Measures of Crime and Deviance I: Item Response Theory Scaling.”Journal of Quantitative Criminology18:267–96.
62.
OsgoodD. WayneSchreckChristopher. 2007. “A New Method for Studying the Extent, Stability, and Predictors of Individual, Specialization in Violence.”Criminology45:273–312.
63.
PaschallMallie J.OrnsteinMiriam L.FlewellingRobert L.. 2001. “African American Male Adolescents’ Involvement in The Criminal Justice System: The Criterion Validity of Self-report Measures in a Prospective Study.”Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency38:174–87.
64.
PaternosterRaymondBushwayShawnApelRobertBrameRobert. 2003. “The Effect of Teenage Employment on Delinquency and Problem Behaviors.”Social Forces82:297–335.
65.
PiqueroAlex R.PaternosterRaymondBrameRobertMazerollePaulDeanCharles W.. 1999. “Onset Age and Specialization in Offending Behavior.”Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency36:235–74.
66.
PrattTravis C.CullenFrancis T.SellersChristine S.WinfreeThomasJr.MadensenTamara DE. DaigleLeahFearnNoelle E.GauJacinta M.. 2010. “The Empirical Status of Social Learning Theory: A Meta-analysis.”Justice Quarterly27:765–802.
67.
PrattTravis C.TuranovicJillian. 2012. “Going Back to the Beginning: Crime as a Process.” Pp. 39–52 in When Crime Appears: The Role of Emergence, edited by McGloinJean MarieSullivanChristopher J.KennedyLeslie W.. New York: Routledge.
68.
ReynoldsPaul. 1971. A Primer in Theory Construction. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merill.
69.
RobertsJennifer J.HorneyJulie. 2010. “The Life Event Calendar Method in Criminological Research.” Pp. 289–312 in Handbook of Quantitative Criminology, edited by PiqueroAlex R.WeisburdDavid. New York: Springer.
70.
RubinDonald B. 2008. “For Objective Causal Inference, Design Trumps Analysis.”Annals of Applied Statistics2:808–40.
71.
RundleAndrew G.BaderMichael D. M.RichardsCatherine A.NeckermanKathryn M.TeitlerJulien O.. 2011. “Using Google Street View to Audit Neighborhood Environments.”American Journal of Preventive Medicine40:94–100.
72.
SampsonRobert J.LaubJohn H.. 1993. Crime in the Making: Pathways and Turning Points through Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
73.
SampsonRobert J.LaubJohn H.. 2005. “ Seductions of Method: Rejoinder to Nagin and Tremblay’s ‘Developmental Trajectory Groups: Fact or Fiction?’.” Criminology43:905–13.
74.
SampsonRobert J.RaudenbushSteven. 1999. “Systematic Social Observation of Public Spaces: A New Look at Disorder in Urban Neighborhoods.”American Sociological Review105:603–51.
75.
ShadishWilliamCookThomasCampbellDonald T.. 2002. Experimental and Quasi-experimental Design for Generalized Causal Inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
76.
ShawClifford R.1931. The Natural History of a Delinquent Career. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
77.
ShortJames F.1998. “The Level of Explanation Problem Revisited: The American Society of Criminology 1997 Presidential Address.”Criminology36:3–36.
78.
ShortJames F.NyeF. Ivan. 1957. “Reported Behavior as a Criterion of Deviant Behavior.”Social Problems5:207–13.
79.
ShortJames F.StrodtbeckFred L.. 1965. Group Process and Gang Delinquency. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
80.
SkardhamerTorbjøn. 2010. “Distinguishing Facts and Artifacts in Group-based Modeling.”Criminology48:295–320.
81.
SkoganWesley G.1981. Issues in the Measurement of Victimization. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
82.
StewartDavid W.KaminsMichael A.. 1993. Secondary Research: Information Sources and Methods. 2nd ed. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
83.
SullivanChristopher J.2006. “Early Adolescent Delinquency Assessing the Role of Childhood Problems, Family Environment, and Peer Pressure.”Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice4:291–313.
84.
SullivanChristopher J.2012. “Measurement and Analysis of the Emergence of Crime.” Pp. 225–42 in When Crime Appears: The Role of Emergence, edited by McGloinJean MarieSullivanChristopher J.KennedyLeslie W.. New York: Routledge.
85.
SullivanChristopher J.McGloinJean MarieCaudyMichaelRayJames. 2009. “Detecting Specialization in Offending: Comparing Analytic Approaches.”Journal of Quantitative Criminology25:419–41.
86.
ThomasKyleMcGloinJean Marie. 2013. “A Dual-systems Approach for Understanding Differential Susceptibility to Processes of Peer Influence.”Criminology51:435–71.
87.
ThornberryTerrenceKrohnMarvin. 2000. “The Self Report Method for Measuring Delinquency and Crime.” Pp. 33–83 in Measurement and Analysis of Crime and Justice, Vol. 4, edited by DuffeeDavid. Washington, DC: Office of Justice Programs.
88.
TurnerMichaelHartmanJenniferBishopDonna. 2007. “The Effects of Prenatal Problems, Family Functioning and Neighborhood Disadvantage in Predicting Life-course Persistent Offending.”Criminal Justice and Behavior34:1241–61.
89.
TurnerMichaelPiqueroAlex. 2002. “The Stability of Self-control.”Journal of Criminal Justice30:457–71.
90.
WarrMarkStaffordMark. 1983. “Fear of Victimization: A Look at the Proximate Causes.”Social Forces61:1033–43.
91.
WeermanFrank M.2011. “Delinquent Peers in Context: A Longitudinal Network Analysis of Selection and Influence Effects.”Criminology49:253–86.
92.
WeisJoseph G.1986. “Issues in the Measurement of Criminal Careers.” Pp. 1–51 in Criminal Careers and “Career Criminals,” Vol. 2, edited by BlumsteinAlfredCohenJacquelineRothJeffrey A.VisherChristy A.. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
93.
WeisburdDavidPiqueroAlex. 2008. “How Well Do Criminologists Explain Crime?” Pp. 453–502 in Crime And Justice: An Annual Review of Research, Vol. 37, edited by TonryMichael. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
94.
WellsL. EdwardRankinJoseph H.. 1995. “Juvenile Victimization: Convergent Validation of Alternative Measurements.”Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency32:287–307.
95.
WhyteWilliam Foote. 1943. Street Corner Society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
96.
WikströmPer-Olof H.2006. “Individuals, Settings, and Acts of Crime: Situational Mechanisms and the Explanation of Crime.” Pp. 61–107 in The Explanation of Crime: Context, Mechanisms, and Development, edited by WikströmPer-Olof H.SampsonRobert J.. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
WilliamsJay R.GoldMartin. 1972. “From Delinquent Behavior to Official Delinquency.”Social Problems20:209–29.
99.
WrightJohn PaulCullenFrancis T.. 2001. “Parental Efficacy and Delinquent Behavior: Do Control and Support Matter?”Criminology39:677–706.
100.
WrightRichardDeckerScottRedfernAllisonSmithDietrich. 1992. “A Snowball’s Chance in Hell: Doing Fieldwork with Active Residential Burglars.”Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency29:148–61.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
