The effect of legal and extralegal factors on felony sentence outcomes has been widely studied, typically using a total incarceration variable that defines sentence outcomes as incarceration or probation. Research conducted by Holleran and Spohn has called this into question, revealing that factors that affected jail sentences were different than those that affected prison sentences and demonstrating that the conclusions one would draw regarding the influence of extralegal offender characteristics such as race and ethnicity differ depending on the way in which sentence was defined. The authors replicate and extend the research conducted by Holleran and Spohn, using several operational definitions of the decision to incarcerate or not, focusing on sentence outcomes for offenders convicted of felonies in a jurisdiction with an indeterminate sentencing system. Results provide compelling evidence in support of Holleran and Spohn.
Blumstein, A., J. Cohen, S. Martin, and M. H. Tonry, eds. 1983. Research on Sentencing: The Search for Reform, Volume I. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
2.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. 2004a. Felony Sentences in State Courts, 2002 (NCJ1911702). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
3.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. 2004b. Profile of Jail Inmates, 2002 (NCJ201932). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
4.
Chesney-Lind, M.1997. The Female Offender: Girls, Women, and Crime. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
Chiricos, T. and C. Crawford. 1995. “Race and Imprisonment: A Contextual Assessment of the Evidence.” Pp. 281-309 in Ethnicity, Race, and Crime: Perspectives Across Time and Place, edited by D. Hawkins. Albany: State University of New York Press.
6.
Daly, K. and R. L. Bordt. 1995. “Sex Effects and Sentencing: An Analysis of the Statistical Literature.”Justice Quarterly12 (1): 141-145.
7.
Daly, K.1987. “Rethinking Judicial Paternalism: Gender, Work-Family Relations and Sentencing.”Gender and Society3: 9-36.
8.
Daly, K.1989. “Discrimination in the Criminal Courts: Family, Gender and the Problem of Equal Treatment.”Social Forces66: 152-175.
9.
Durham, A. M., III.1994. Crisis and Reform: Current Issues in American Punishment. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
10.
Farrell, R. A. and M. D. Holmes. 1991. “The Social and Cognitive Structure of Legal Decision-Making.”Sociological Quarterly32 (4): 529-542.
11.
Greenberg, D. F.2002. “‘Justice’ and Criminal Justice.” Pp. 319-354 in Crime Control and Social Justice: The Delicate Balance, edited by D. F. Hawkins, S. L. Meyers, Jr., and R. N. Stone. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
12.
Holleran, D. and C. Spohn. 2004. “On the Use of the Total Incarceration Variable in Sentencing Research.”Criminology42 (1): 211-240.
13.
Huling, T.2002. “Building a Prison Economy in Rural America.” Pp. 197-213 in Invisible Punishment: The Collateral Consequences of Mass Imprisonment, edited by M. Mauer and M. Chesney-Lind. New York: Free Press.
14.
Irwin, J. and J. Austin. 1997. It’s About Time: America’s Imprisonment Binge. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
15.
Kramer, J. and D. Steffensmeier. 1993. “Race and Imprisonment Decisions.”Sociological Quarterly34 (2): 357-376.
16.
Nobling, T., C. Spohn, and M. DeLone. 1998. “A Tale of Two Counties: Unemployment and Sentence Severity.”Justice Quarterly15 (3): 459-485.
17.
Petersilia, J.2003. When Prisoners Come Home: Parole and Prisoner Reentry. New York: Oxford University Press.
18.
Sampson, R. J. and J. H. Laub. 1993. Crime in the Making. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19.
Spohn, C.1998. “Gender and Sentencing of Drug Offenders: Is Chivalry Dead?”Criminal Justice Policy Review9: 363-399.
20.
Spohn, C.2000. “Thirty Years of Sentencing Reform: The Quest for a Racially Neutral Sentencing Process.” Pp. 427-501 in Criminal Justice 2000, vol. 3. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
21.
Spohn, C. and D. Beichner. 2000. “Is Preferential Treatment of Female Offenders a Thing of the Past? A Multisite Study of Gender, Race, and Imprisonment.”Criminal Justice Policy Review11 (2): 149-184.
22.
Spohn, C. and J. Cederblom. 1991. “Race and Disparities in Sentencing: A Test of the Liberation Hypothesis.”Justice Quarterly8 (3): 305-327.
23.
Spohn, C. and D. Holleran. 2000. “The Imprisonment Penalty Paid by Young Unemployed, Black and Hispanic Male Offenders.”Criminology38 (1): 281-306.
24.
Spohn, C. and R. K. Piper. 2004. Felony Case Processing Decisions in a Midwestern County. Final Report to the Midwestern County Court Administrator.
25.
Spohn, C. and J. Spears. 1997. “Gender and Case Processing Outcomes: A Comparison of Case Outcomes for Male and Female Defendants Charged with Violent Felonies.”Women and Criminal Justice8: 29-59.
26.
Steen, S., R. L. Engen, and R. R. Gainey. 2005. “Images of Danger and Culpability: Racial Stereotyping, Case Processing, and Criminal Sentencing.”Criminology43 (2): 453-468.
27.
Steffensmeier, D. and S. Demuth. 2001. “Ethnicity and Judges’ Sentencing Decisions: Hispanic-Black-White Comparisons.”Criminology39 (1): 145-178.
28.
Steffensmeier, D., J. Kramer, C. Streifel. 1993. “Gender and Imprisonment Decisions.”Criminology31 (3): 411-446.
29.
Steffensmeier, D., J. Kramer, and J. Ulmer. 1995. “Age Differences in Sentencing.”Justice Quarterly12 (3): 584-601.
30.
Steffensmeier, D., J. Ulmer, and J. Kramer. 1998. “The Interaction of Race, Gender, and Age in Criminal Sentencing: The Punishment Cost of Being Young, Black, and Male.”Criminology36 (4): 763-797.
31.
Studenmund, A. H.1997. Using Econometrics: A Practical Guide. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
32.
Ulmer, J.2000. “The Rules Have Changed So Proceed With Caution: A Comment on Engen and Gainey’s Method for Modeling Sentencing Outcomes Under Guidelines.”Criminology24 (4): 1231-1243.
33.
Ulmer, J. T. and B. Johnson. 2004. “Sentencing in Context: A Multilevel Analysis.”Criminology42 (1): 137-177.
34.
Zatz, M. S.1987. “The Changing Forms of Racial/Ethnic Bias in Sentencing.”Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency24 (1): 69-92.
35.
Zatz, M. S.2000. “The Convergence of Race, Ethnicity, Gender, and Class in Court Decisionmaking: Looking Toward the 21st Century.” Pp. 503-552 in Criminal Justice 2000, vol. 3. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
