Abstract
Research on sentencing typically measures the sentence with either a dichotomous in/out variable that combines prison and jail sentences, or with a continuous variable of the length of the sentence. Holleran and Spohn called this into question, arguing that combining prison and jail into a “total incarceration” measure can lead to overly simplistic findings. We use data from Miami-Dade County, Florida (N = 40,240) to replicate and extend Holleran and Spohn’s research, with additional model flexibility for both in/out and sentence length. We find that not only are there distinct disparities that would have been undetected using the total incarceration variable, but these disparities also vary across the sentence length distribution.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
