This article summarizes the Correlates of War Intergovernmental Organizations (IGO) Version 3.0 datasets. The new datasets include information about the population of IGOs in the international system and state participation in those formal international institutions from 1816 to 2014. Consistent with Versions 2.0 and 2.3, Version 3.0 of the IGO data comes in three forms: country-year, IGO-year, and joint dyadic membership. This article briefly describes the data collection process and identifies important changes to the dataset before moving to analyze fundamental patterns in the data. Most notable among the changes from earlier versions of the data is the inclusion of annual membership data for the 1815–1964 time period. In addition, we present information about the overall trends in the institutionalization of cooperation at both the global and regional levels, with the latter focusing on the interesting membership dynamics in Asia and Africa. We then track and discuss patterns in state memberships and examine how these changes manifest in the dyadic data. The article concludes with a discussion of how the COW IGO 3.0 data compare to other prominent datasets on state participation in international institutions and highlights some new areas of research that will benefit from the release of the updated IGO membership dataset.
AbbottKenneth WGreenJessica FKeohaneRobert O (2016) Organizational ecology and institutional change in global governance. International Organization70(2): 247–277.
2.
AcharyaAmitavJohnstonAlastair Iain (2007) Comparing regional institutions: An introduction. In: AcharyaAmitavJohnstonAlastair Iain (eds) Crafting Cooperation: Regional International Institutions in Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1–31.
3.
AkzinBenjamin (1955) New States and International Organizations. Paris: UNESCO.
4.
AndersonChristopher CMitchellSara McLaughlinSchillingEmily U (2016) Kantian dynamics revisited: Time-varying analyses of dyadic IGO-conflict relationships. International Interactions42(4): 644–676.
5.
AndonovaLiliana B (2017) Governance Entrepreneurs: International Organizations and the Rise of Global Public–Private Partnerships. New York: Cambridge University Press.
6.
BarnettMichaelFinnemoreMartha (2004) Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
7.
BarnettMichael; Jon CW Pevehouse & Kal Raustiala (2018) Reconsidering global governance. Working paper.
8.
BeckfieldJason (2008) The dual world polity: Fragmentation and integration in the network of intergovernmental organizations. Social Problems55(3): 419–442.
9.
BoehmerCharlesNordstromTimothy (2008) Intergovernmental organization memberships: Examining political community and the attributes of international organizations. International Interactions34(3): 282–309.
10.
BoehmerCharlesGartzkeErikNordstromTimothy (2004) Do IGOs promote peace?World Politics57(1): 1–38.
11.
CaoXun (2012) Global networks and domestic policy convergence: A network explanation of policy changes. World Politics64(3): 375–425.
12.
ChachaMwita (2014) Regional integration and the challenge of overlapping memberships on trade. Journal of International Relations and Development17(4): 522–544.
13.
CopelovitchMark SOhlsDavid (2012) Trade, institutions, and the timing of GATT/WTO accession in post-colonial states. Review of International Organizations7(1): 81–107.
14.
CopelovitchMark SPutnamTonya L (2014) Design in context: Existing international agreements and new cooperation. International Organization68(2): 471–493.
DonnoDanielaMetzgerShawna KRussettBruce (2015) Screening out risk: IGOs, member state selection, and interstate conflict, 1951–2000. International Studies Quarterly59(2): 251–263.
17.
DorussenHanWardHugh (2008) Intergovernmental organizations and the Kantian peace: A network perspective. Journal of Conflict Resolution52(2): 189–212.
18.
FarberHenry SGowaJoanne (1995) Polities and peace. International Security20(2): 123–146.
19.
FawcettLouiseHurrellAndrew, eds (1995) Regionalism in World Politics: Regional Organization and International Order. New York: Oxford University Press.
20.
GartzkeErikChristinaSchneider (2013) Data sets and quantitative research in the study of intergovernmental organizations. In: ReinaldaBob (ed.) Routledge Handbook of International Organization. New York: Routledge, 41–53.
21.
GiblerDouglas (2017) State development, parity, and international conflict. American Political Science Review111(1): 21–38.
22.
GoertzGaryPowersKathy (2014) Regional governance: The evolution of a new institutional form. WZB discussion paper no. SP IV 2014–106.
23.
GrayJulia (2018) Life, death, or zombie? The vitality of international organizations. International Studies Quarterly62(1): 1–13.
24.
GreenhillBrian (2010) The company you keep: International socialization and the diffusion of human rights norms. International Studies Quarterly54(1): 127–145.
25.
GreenhillBrianLupuYonatan (2017) Clubs of clubs: Fragmentation in the network of intergovernmental organizations. International Studies Quarterly61(1): 181–195.
26.
GreigJ Michael (2015) Nipping them in the bud: The onset of mediation in low-intensity civil conflicts. Journal of Conflict Resolution59(2): 336–361.
27.
GreigJ MichaelDiehlPaul F (2006) Softening up: Making conflicts more amenable to diplomacy. International Interactions32(4): 355–384.
28.
HaasErnst B (1970) The study of regional integration: Reflections on the joy and anguish of pretheorizing. International Organization24(4): 606–646.
29.
Hafner-BurtonEmily MMontgomeryAlexander H (2006) Power positions: International organizations, social networks, and conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution50(1): 3–27.
30.
Hafner-BurtonEmily MMansfieldEdward DPevehouseJon CW (2015) Human rights institutions, sovereignty costs and democratization. British Journal of Political Science45(1): 1–27.
31.
HaftelYoram Z (2013) Commerce and institutions: Trade, scope, and the design of regional economic organizations. Review of International Organizations8(3): 389–414.
32.
HaftelYoram ZHofmannStephanie C (2017) Institutional authority and security cooperation within regional economic organizations. Journal of Peace Research54(4): 484–498.
33.
HoogheLiesbetMarksGaryLenzTobiasBezuijenJeanineCekaBesirDerderyanSvet (2017) Measuring International Authority: A Postfunctionalist Theory of Governance, Volume III. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34.
IkenberryG John (2009) After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order After Major Wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
35.
JacobsonHarold KReisingerWilliam MMathersTodd (1986) National entanglements in international governmental organizations. American Political Science Review80(1): 141–159.
36.
JohnsonTana (2014) Organizational Progeny: Why Governments Are Losing Control Over the Proliferating Structures of Global Governance. New York: Oxford University Press.
37.
JohnstonAlastair Iain (2001) Treating international institutions as social environments. International Studies Quarterly45(4): 487–515.
38.
KeohaneRobert O (1984) After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
39.
KinneBrandon J (2013) IGO membership, network convergence, and credible signaling in militarized disputes. Journal of Peace Research50(6): 659–676.
40.
KoremenosBarbara (2016) The Continent of International Law: Explaining Agreement Design. New York: Cambridge University Press.
41.
KoremenosBarbaraLipsonCharlesSnidalDuncan (2001) The rational design of international institutions. International Organization55(4): 761–799.
42.
LeedsBrett Ashley (2003) Alliance reliability in times of war: Explaining state decisions to violate treaties. International Organization57(4): 801–827.
43.
LiaoRebecca (2015) Out of the Bretton Woods: How the AIIB is different. Foreign Affairs27(July): 633–649.
44.
LundgrenMagnus (2016) Conflict management capabilities of peace-brokering international organizations, 1945–2010: A new dataset. Conflict Management and Peace Science33(2): 198–223.
45.
MansfieldEdward DMilnerHelen (2015) Trade Cooperation: The Purpose, Design, and Effects of Preferential Trade Agreements. New York: Cambridge University Press.
46.
MansfieldEdward DPevehouseJon CW (2006) Democratization and international organizations. International Organization60(1): 137–167.
47.
MansfieldEdward DPevehouseJon CW (2008) Democratization and the varieties of international organizations. Journal of Conflict Resolution52(2): 269–294.
48.
MansfieldEdward DMilnerHelen VPevehouseJon CW (2008) Democracy, veto players and the depth of regional integration. World Economy31(1): 67–96.
49.
MaozZeev (2010) Networks of Nations: The Evolution, Structure, and Impact of International Networks, 1816–2001. New York: Cambridge University Press.
50.
MartinLisa LSimmonsBeth A (1998) Theories and empirical studies of international institutions. International Organization52(4): 729–757.
51.
MattesMichaela (2012) Democratic reliability, precommitment of successor governments, and the choice of alliance commitment. International Organization66(1): 153–172.
52.
McDonaldPatrick J (2015) Great powers, hierarchy, and endogenous regimes: Rethinking the domestic causes of peace. International Organization69(3): 557–588.
53.
NyeJoseph S (1970) Comparing common markets: A revised neo-functionalist model. International Organization24(4): 796–835.
54.
OrsiniAmandineMorinJean-FredericYoungOran (2013) Regime complexes: A buzz, a boom, or a boost for global governance?Global Governance19(1): 27–39.
55.
PevehouseJon CWRussettBruce (2006) Democratic international governmental organizations promote peace. International Organization60(4): 969–1000.
56.
PevehouseJon CWMcManusRoseanneNordstromTimothy (2018) Intergovernmental Organizations Data Version 3 Codebook. University of Wisconsin-Madison.
57.
PevehouseJon CWNordstromTimothyWarnkeKevin (2004) The Correlates of War 2 International Governmental Organizations Data Version 2.0. Conflict Management and Peace Science21(2): 101–119.
58.
PoastPaulUrpelainenJohannes (2015) How international organizations support democratization: Preventing authoritarian reversals or promoting consolidation?World Politics67(1): 72–113.
59.
PoastPaulUrpelainenJohannes (2018) The International Politics of Democratic Transitions: How International Organizations Assist New Democracies. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
60.
RaustialaKalVictorDavid G (2004) The regime complex for plant genetic resources. International Organization58(2): 277–310.
61.
ReyDenisBarkdullJohn (2005) Why do some democratic countries join more intergovernmental organizations than others?Social Science Quarterly86(2): 386–402.
62.
RussettBruce (1968) Delineating international regions. In: David SingerJ (ed.) Quantitative International Politics: Insights and Evidence. New York: Free Press, 317–352.
63.
ShambaughDavid (2005) China engages Asia: Reshaping the regional order. International Security29(3): 64–99.
64.
ShanksCherylJacobsonHarold KKaplanJeffrey H (1996) Inertia and change in the constellation of international governmental organizations, 1981–1992. International Organization50(4): 593–627.
65.
ShannonMegan (2009) Preventing war and providing the peace? International organizations and the management of territorial disputes. Conflict Management and Peace Science26(2): 144–163.
66.
ShannonMeganMoreyDanielBoehmkeFrederick J (2010) The influence of international organizations on militarized dispute initiation and duration. International Studies Quarterly54(4): 1123–1141.
67.
VabulasFelicitySnidalDuncan (2013) Organization without delegation: Informal intergovernmental organizations (IIGOs) and the spectrum of intergovernmental arrangements. Review of International Organizations8(2): 193–220.
von BorzyskowskiInkenVabulasFelicity (2019) Hello, goodbye: When do states withdraw from international organizations?Review of International Organizations14(2): 335–366.
70.
WallaceMichaelDavid SingerJ (1970) Intergovernmental organization in the global system, 1815–1964: A quantitative description. International Organization24(2): 239–287.
71.
WuGuoguangLansdowneHelen (2007) International multilateralism with Chinese characteristics: Attitude changes, policy imperatives, and regional impacts. In: GuoguangWu (ed.) China Turns to Multilateralism. New York: Routledge, 17–32.
72.
ZhukovYuriStewartBrandon M (2013) Choosing your neighbors: Networks of diffusion in international relations. International Studies Quarterly57(2): 271–287.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
