Protection of civilians is now at the forefront of the responsibilities of the international community. There is a strong international norm that civilian populations should be protected from violence. But how committed is the United Nations to acting in line with this norm? I argue that the UN Security Council (UNSC) has an interest in demonstrating that it takes violence against civilians seriously. Through a broadened security agenda including human security, the legitimacy and the credibility of the UNSC hinges on its ability to act as a guarantor of civilian protection. As a consequence, the UN is more likely to deploy peace operations in conflicts where the warring parties target the civilian population. The argument is supported by a statistical examination of all internal armed conflicts in 1989–2006. The results show that the likelihood of a UN peace operation is higher in conflicts with high levels of violence against civilians, but this effect is mainly visible after 1999. This year marked a shift in the global security agenda and it was also when the UNSC first issued an explicit mandate to protect civilians. Conflicts with high levels of violence against civilians are also more likely to get operations with robust mandates. This suggests that the UNSC is not just paying lip service to the protection norm, but that it actually acts to implement it.
AiChunrongNortonEdward C (2003) Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Economic Letters80(1): 123–129.
2.
AndreopoulosGeorge (2010) Collective security and the responsibility to protect. In: DanchinPeter GFischerHorst (eds) United Nations Reform and the New Collective Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 155–172.
3.
BellamyAlex J (2006) Whither the responsibility to protect? Humanitarian intervention and the 2005 World Summit. Ethics and International Affairs20(2): 143–170.
4.
BellamyAlex J (2008) The responsibility to protect and the problem of military intervention. International Affairs84(4): 615–639.
5.
BellamyAlex J (2009a) Realizing the responsibility to protect. International Studies Perspective10(2): 111–128.
6.
BellamyAlex J (2009b) Responsibility To Protect: The Global Effort To End Mass Atrocity. Cambridge: Polity.
7.
BellamyAlex JWilliamsPaul D (2009) The West and contemporary peace operations. Journal of Peace Research46(1): 39–57.
8.
BellamyAlex JWilliamsPaul D (2010) Understanding Peacekeeping, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Polity.
9.
BouldenJane (2006) Double standards, distance and disengagement: Collective legitimization in the post-Cold War Security Council. Security Studies37(3): 409–423.
CarpenterCharli R (2005) ‘Women, children, and other vulnerable groups’: Gender, strategic frames and the protection of civilians as a transformational issue. International Studies Quarterly49(2): 295–334.
12.
ClevesMario A (2002) From the help desk: Comparing areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves from two or more probit or logit models. Stata Journal2(3): 301–313.
13.
ColemanKatharina P (2007) International Organisations and Peace Enforcement: The Politics of International Legitimacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14.
de Jonge OudraatChantal (1996) The United Nations and internal conflict. In BrownMichael E (ed.) The International Dimensions of Internal Conflict. Cambridge: MIT Press, 489–536.
15.
EckKristineHultmanLisa (2007) One-sided violence against civilians in war: Insights from new fatality data. Journal of Peace Research44(2): 233–246.
16.
EvansGareth (2008) The Responsibility To Protect: Ending Mass Atrocity Crimes Once And For All. Washington DC: Brookings.
17.
FearonJames DLaitinDavid D (2003) Ethnicity, insurgency, and civil war. American Political Science Review97(1): 75–90.
18.
FinnemoreMartha (1996) National Interests in International Society. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
19.
FinnemoreMartha (2003) The Purpose of Intervention: Changing Beliefs About the Use of Force. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
20.
FortnaVirginia Page (2004) Does peacekeeping keep peace? International intervention and the duration of peace after civil war. International Studies Quarterly48(2): 269–292.
21.
FortnaVirginia Page (2008) Does Peacekeeping Work? Shaping Belligerents’ Choices After Civil War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
22.
FortnaVirginia PageHowardLise Morjé (2008) Pitfalls and prospects in the peacekeeping literature. Annual Review of Political Science11: 283–301.
23.
GibbsDavid N (1997) Is peacekeeping a new form of imperialism?International Peacekeeping4(1): 122–128.
24.
GilliganMichael JSergentiErnest J (2008) Do UN interventions cause peace? Using matching to improve causal inference. Quarterly Journal of Political Science3(2): 89–122.
25.
GilliganMichaelStedmanStephen John (2003) Where do the peacekeepers go?International Studies Review5(4): 37–54.
26.
GleditschKristian S (2002) Expanded trade and GDP data. Journal of Conflict Resolution46(5): 712–724.
27.
GleditschNils PetterWallensteenPeterErikssonMikaelSollenbergMargaretaStrandHåvard (2002) Armed conflict 1946–2001: A new dataset. Journal of Peace Research39(5): 615–637.
28.
HegreHåvardHultmanLisaNygårdHåvard Mokleiv (2012) Evaluating the conflict-reducing effect of UN peacekeeping operations. Paper presented at the European Political Science Association, Berlin, 20–22 June.
29.
HoltVictoria KTaylorGlyn (2009) Protecting civilians in the context of UN peacekeeping operations: Successes, setbacks and remaining challenges. Report jointly commissioned by DPKO and OCHA. New York: United Nations.
30.
HultmanLisa (2010) Keeping peace or spurring violence? Unintended effects of peace operations on violence against civilians. Civil Wars12(1–2): 29–46.
31.
HurdIan (2002) Legitimacy, power, and the symbolic life of the UN Security Council. Global Governance8(1): 35–51.
32.
ICISS (2001) The Responsibility To Protect. Report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.
JakobsenPeter Viggo (1996) National interest, humanitarianism or CNN: What triggers UN peace enforcement after the Cold War?Journal of Peace Research33(2): 205–215.
35.
KingGaryTomzMichaelWittenbergJason (2000) Making the most of statistical analyses: Improving interpretation and presentation. American Journal of Political Science44(2): 347–361.
36.
KrepsSarahWallaceGeoffrey (2009) Just how humanitarian are interventions? Peacekeeping and the prevention of civilian killings during and after civil wars. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association annual meeting, Toronto, 3–6 September.
37.
MacFarlaneNeil SKhongYuen Foong (2006) Human Security and the UN: A Critical History. United Nations Intellectual History Project Series. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
38.
MaddisonAngus (2003) The World Economy: Historical Statistics. Paris: OECD Development Centre.
39.
MarshallMontyJaggersKeith (2002) Polity IV project: Political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800–2002: Dataset users’ manual. College Park, MD: University of Maryland.
40.
MartenKimberly Zisk (2004) Enforcing the Peace: Learning from the Imperial Past. New York: Columbia University Press.
41.
MelanderErik (2009) Selected to go where murderers lurk? The preventive effect of peacekeeping on mass killings of civilians. Conflict Management and Peace Science26(4): 389–406.
42.
MullenbachMark J (2005) Deciding to keep peace: An analysis of international influences on the establishment of third-party peacekeeping missions. International Studies Quarterly49(3): 529–555.
43.
NeackLaura (1995) UN peace-keeping: In the interest of community or self?Journal of Peace Research32(2): 181–196.
44.
RamsbothamOliverWoodhouseTom (1996) Humanitarian Intervention in Contemporary Conflict. Cambridge: Polity.
45.
ReganPatrick M (2002) Civil Wars and Foreign Powers: Outside Intervention in Intrastate Conflict. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
46.
SingerDavid J (1987) Reconstructing the Correlates of War dataset on material capabilities of states, 1916–1985. International Interactions14(2): 115–132.
47.
TeorellJanCharronNicholasSamanniMarcusHolmbergSörenRothsteinBo (2009) The Quality of Government Dataset, version 17 June 09. University of Gothenburg: Quality of Government Institute (http://www.qog.pol.gu.se).
48.
ThakurRameshWeissThomas G (2009) R2P: From idea to norm – and action?Global Responsibility to Protect1(1): 22–53.
49.
TomzMichaelWittenbergJasonKingGary (2001) CLARIFY: Software for interpreting and presenting statistical results, version 2.0. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, 1 June (http://gking.harvard.edu, accessed 11 May 2010).
50.
United Nations (1991) Report of the Secretary General on the work of the organization. A/46/1.
51.
United Nations (1992) An agenda for peace: Preventive diplomacy, peacemaking and peace-keeping. A/47/ - S/24111.
52.
United Nations (1994) Security Council resolution 918 [on the expansion of the mandate of the UN assistance mission for Rwanda]. S/RES/918.
53.
United Nations (1999a) Security Council resolution 1270 [on establishment of the UN mission in Sierra Leone]. S/RES/1270.
54.
United Nations (1999b) Security Council 4054th meeting, New York, 22 October. S/PV.4054.
55.
United Nations (2000a) Report of the panel on United Nations peace operations, led by Lakhdar Brahimi. A/55/305-S/2000/809.
56.
United Nations (2000b) Security Council resolution 1296 [on protection of civilians in armed conflict]. S/RES/1296.
57.
United Nations (2004) A More Secure World: Our Shared Responsibility. Report of the High-Level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change, A/59/565, 2 December (http://www.un.org/secureworld/report3.pdf).
58.
United Nations (2005) UN General Assembly 2005 World Summit outcome. A/60/L.1*.
59.
United Nations (2006a) Security Council resolution 1674 [on protection of civilians in armed conflict]. S/RES/1674.
60.
United Nations (2006b) Security Council 5511th meeting, New York, 11 August. S/PV.5511.
61.
United Nations (2007) Security Council resolution 1769 [on establishment of AU/UN hybrid operation in Darfur (UNAMID)]. S/RES/1769.
Uppsala Conflict Data Program (2010) UCDP Battle-Related Deaths Dataset v.5-2010. Uppsala University (www.ucdp.uu.se, accessed 23 March 2011).
64.
WardMichael DGreenhillBrian DBakkeKristin M (2010) The perils of policy by p-value: Predicting civil conflicts. Journal of Peace Research47(4): 363–375.
65.
WheelerNicholas JEgertonFrazer (2009) The responsibility to protect: ‘Precious commitment’ or promise unfulfilled?Global Responsibility to Protect1(1): 114–132.
66.
WillsSiobhán (2009) Protecting Civilians: The Obligations of Peacekeepers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
