Quantifying intelligence cooperation: The United States International Intelligence Behavior (USIIB) dataset

Abstract

This report describes the creation of the United States International Intelligence Behavior dataset (USIIB). The USIIB represents the first collection of event data specifically intended for exploring in a quantifiable manner the international intelligence cooperation behaviors of the United States. A total of 293,615 events are recorded in the USIIB, covering the years 2000–09. The report first provides a detailed description of the steps involved in building such a dataset, including the development of search terms, the use of a machine coding program (TABARI – Text Analysis by Augmenting Replacement Instructions) to extract data from wire news releases, and the extension of an existing coding scheme (CAMEO) to include intelligence behaviors. Following a discussion of issues related to the reliability and validity of event datasets in general and the USIIB in particular, the report then includes suggestions and examples for how the data in the current USIIB dataset may be used in order to add to our understandings of patterns and anomalies in international intelligence cooperation behavior. As a specific example, it offers results from an empirical test exploring variation in intelligence cooperation behaviors among democracies and non-democracies, asking specifically whether the United States has been more likely in the early 21st century to cooperate on intelligence matters with democratic states, and finding this not to have been the case. Finally, it aims to provide a guide for others who would like to extend this dataset to explore intelligence cooperation activity of other countries or regions.

Keywords

event dataset intelligence cooperation security

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aldrich

Richard J

(2004) Transatlantic intelligence and security cooperation. International Affairs 80(4): 731–753.

Aldrich

Richard J

(2009) US–European intelligence co-operation on counter-terrorism: Low politics and compulsion. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 11(1): 122–139.

Andrew

Christopher

(2004) Intelligence, international relations and ‘under-theorisation’. Intelligence and National Security 19(2): 170–184.

Azar

Edward E

(1980) The Conflict and Peace Data Bank (COPDAB) project. Journal of Conflict Resolution 24(1): 143–152.

Bensahel

Nora

(2006) A coalition of coalitions: International cooperation against terrorism. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 29(1): 35–49.

Bond

Doug

Bond

Joe

Churl

Craig Jenkins

Taylor

Charles Lewis

(2003) Integrated Data for Events Analysis (IDEA): An event typology for automated events data development. Journal of Peace Research 40(6): 733–745.

Clough

Chris

(2004) Quid pro quo: The challenges of international strategic intelligence cooperation. International Journal of Intelligence and Counterintelligence 17(4): 601–613.

Davies

John L

McDaniel

Chad K

(1994) A new generation of international event data. International Interactions 20 (1–2): 55–78.

Dumbrell

John

(2009) The US–UK special relationship: Taking the 21st century temperature. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 11(1): 64–78.

10.

Earl

Jennifer

Martin

Andrew

McCarthy

John D

Soule

Sarah A

(2004) The use of newspaper data in the study of collective action. Annual Review of Sociology 30: 65–80.

11.

Engene

Jan Oskar

(2007) Five decades of terrorism in Europe: The TWEED dataset. Journal of Peace Research 44(1): 109–121.

12.

Franzosi

Roberto

(1987) The press as a source of sociohistorical data. Historical Methods 20(1): 5–16.

13.

Gerner

Deborah J

Schrodt

Philip A

Francisco

Ronald A

Weddle

Judith L

(1994) Machine coding of event data using regional and international sources. International Studies Quarterly 38(1): 91–119.

14.

Gerner

Deborah J

Philip

A Schrodt

Ömür

Yilmaz

Rajaa

Abu-Jabr

(2002) Conflict and Mediation Event Observations (CAMEO): A new event data framework for the analysis of foreign policy interactions. Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association, New Orleans, LA (http://web.ku.edu/keds/papers.dir/gerner02.pdf) (http://eventdata.psu.edu/papers.dir/Gerner.APSA.02.pdf).

15.

Hillard

Dustin

Purpura

Stephen

Wilkerson

John

(2008) Computer-assisted topic classification for mixed-methods social science research. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 4(4): 31–46.

16.

Howell

Llewellyn D

(1983) A comparative study of the WEIS and COPDAB data sets. International Studies Quarterly 27(2): 149–159.

17.

Howell

Llewellyn D

Barnes

Gillian

(1993) Event data for region-specific interactions: A research note on source coverage. In: Merritt

Richard L

Muncaster

Robert G

Zinnes

Dina A

(eds) International Event-Data Developments: DDIR Phase II. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 45–54.

18.

Hussain

Imtiaz

(2009) Post-9/11 Canada–US security integration: Of the butcher, the baker, and the intelligence-policy maker. American Review of Canadian Studies 39(1): 38–51.

19.

Huxtable

Phillip A

Pevehouse

Jon C

(1996) Potential validity problems in event data collection. International Studies Notes 21(2): 8–19.

20.

Jenkins

J Craig

Bond

Doug

(2001) Conflict-carrying capacity, political crisis, and reconstruction: A framework for the early warning of political system vulnerability. Journal of Conflict Resolution 45(1): 3–31.

21.

KEDS Project Software (2003) Text filter: nexispider.pl.web.ku.edu/keds (http://web.ku.edu/keds/software.dir/filters.html) (http://eventdata.psu.edu/software.dir/filters.html).

22.

KEDS Project Software (2005) Utility programs: One-A-Day_Filter.web.ku.edu/keds (http://web.ku.edu/keds/software.dir/utilities.html).

23.

KEDS Project Software (2008) Utility programs: Keds_Count (http://web.ku.edu/keds/software.dir/utilities.html) (http://eventdata.psu.edu/software.dir/utilities.html).

24.

King

Gary

Lowe

Will

(2003) An automated information extraction tool for international conflict data with performance as good as human coders: A rare events evaluation design. International Organization 57(3): 617–642.

25.

Koopmans

Ruud

Rucht

Dieter

(1999) Protest event analysis – where to now? Mobilization 4: 123–130.

26.

Lander

Stephen

(2004) International intelligence cooperation: An inside perspective. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 17(3): 481–493.

27.

Lefebvre

Stéphan

(2003) The difficulties and dilemmas of international intelligence cooperation. International Journal of Intelligence and Counterintelligence 16(3): 527–542.

28.

Leng

Russell J

(1993) Automated and machine-assisted coding of event data: The BCOW approach. In: Merritt

Richard L

Muncaster

Robert G

Zinnes

Dina A

(eds) International Event-Data Developments: DDIR Phase II. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 113–123.

29.

Matei

Florina Cristiana

(2009) The challenges of intelligence sharing in Romania. Intelligence and National Security 24(4): 574–585.

30.

McCarthy

John D

McPhail

Clark

Smith

Jackie

(1996) Images of protest: Dimensions of selection bias in media coverage of Washington demonstrations, 1982 and 1991. American Sociological Review 61(3): 478–499.

31.

McClelland

Charles A

(1978) World Event/Interaction Survey (WEIS) 1966–1978 (ICPSR 5211). Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.

32.

Munton

Don

(2009) Intelligence cooperation meets international studies theory: Explaining Canadian operations in Castro’s Cuba. Intelligence & National Security 24(1): 119–138.

33.

Olzak

Susan

(1989) Analysis of events in studies of collective actions. Annual Review of Sociology 1 5: 119–141.

34.

Ortiz

David G

Myers

Daniel J

Walls

Eugene N

Diaz

Maria-Elena D

(2005) Where do we stand with newspaper data? Mobilization: An International Quarterly 10(3): 397–419.

35.

Rucht

Dieter

Koopmans

Ruud

Neidhardt

Friedhelm

(1999) Acts of Dissent. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

36.

Rudner

Martin

(2004) Hunters and gatherers: The intelligence coalition against Islamic terrorism. International Journal of Intelligence and Counterintelligence 17(2): 193–230.

37.

Schrodt

Philip A

(2006) TABARI: Textual Analysis by Augmented Replacement Instructions Version 0.5. KEDS: Kansas Event Data System. (http://web.ku.edu/keds/software.dir/tabari.html) (http://eventdata.psu.edu/software.dir/tabari.html).

38.

Schrodt

Philip A

Gerner

Deborah J

(1994) Validity assessment of a machine-coded event data set for the Middle East, 1982–92. American Journal of Political Science 38(3): 825–854.

39.

Schrodt

Philip A

Davis

Shannon G

Weddle

Judy L

(1994) Political science: KEDS – A program for the machine coding of event data. Social Science Computer Review 12(3): 561–588.

40.

Shellman

Stephen M

(2008) Quantifying violence and nonviolence: Terrorism & Political Violence events data sets. Electronic Newsletter of the ECPR-SG on Extremism & Democracy 9(2) (http://www.tufts.edu/~dart01/extremismanddemocracy/newsletter/Article7_4.htm).

41.

Shpiro

Shlomo

(2001) The communication of mutual security: Frameworks for European–Mediterranean intelligence sharing (http://www.nato.int/acad/fellow/99-01/shpiro.pdf).

42.

Sims

Jennifer E

(2006) Foreign intelligence liaison: Devils, deals, and details. International Journal of Intelligence and Counterintelligence 19(2): 195–217.

43.

Strachan-Morris

David

(2009) The future of civil–military intelligence cooperation based on lessons learned in Iraq. Intelligence and National Security 24(2): 257–274.

44.

Svendsen

Adam DM

(2009) Connecting intelligence and theory: Intelligence liaison and international relations. Intelligence and National Security 24(5): 700–729.

45.

Tan

See Seng

Ramakrishna

Kumar

(2004) Interstate and intrastate dynamics in Southeast Asia’s war on terror. SAIS Review 24(1): 91–105.

46.

Vincent

Jack E

(1983) WEIS and COPDAB: Correspondence problems. International Studies Quarterly 27: 161–168.

47.

Wilkes

Rima

Ricard

Danielle

(2007) How does newspaper coverage of collective action vary? Protest by indigenous people in Canada. Social Science Journal 44 (2 ): 231–251.

48.

Woolley

John T

(2000) Using media-based data in studies of politics. American Journal of Political Science 44(1): 156–173.

49.

9/11 Commission Report (2002) (http://www.gpoaccess.gov/911/pdf/fullreport.pdf).

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB