Why are some firms more successful at introducing radical product innovations than others? Following Schumpeter (1942), many researchers have suggested that firm size is the key organizational predictor of radical product innovation. The authors provide an alternate view and argue that one key variable that differentiates firms with strong radical product innovation records from others is the firms’ willingness to cannibalize their own investments. The authors identify three organizational factors that drive a firm's willingness to cannibalize. Results from a survey of three high-tech industries tend to support the alternate view that willingness to cannibalize is a more powerful driver of radical product innovation than firm size is. These results suggest a need to reconsider conventional wisdom on firm size, cannibalization, and organizational synergy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AcsZoltan J., and AudretschDavid B. (1991), Innovation and Technological Change: An International Comparison.Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
2.
AikenMichael, and HageJerald (1968), “Organizational Independence and Intra-Organizational Structure,”American Sociological Review, 33(December), 912–30.
3.
AliA. (1994), “Pioneering Versus Incremental Innovation: Review and Research Propositions,”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 11(January), 46–56.
4.
AndersonErin, and WeitzBarton (1992), ‘The Use of Pledges to Build and Sustain Commitment in Distribution Channels,”Journal of Marketing Research, 29(February), 18–34.
5.
AndersonJames C., and GerbingDavid W. (1988), “Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach,”Psychological Bulletin, 103(May), 411–23.
6.
AndersonPhilip, and TushmanMichael L. (1990), ‘Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: A Cyclical Model of Technological Change,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(December), 604–34.
7.
BaronR.M., and KennyD.A. (1986), “The Moderator-Mediator Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(December), 1173–82.
8.
BeardenWilliam O., IngramThomas N., and LaForgeRaymond W. (1995), Marketing: Principles and Perspectives.Chicago: Richard D. Irwin.
9.
BouldingWilliam, and MorganRuskin, and StaelinRichard (1997), “Pulling the Plug to Stop the New Product Drain,”Journal of Marketing Research, 34(February), 164–76.
10.
BrocknerJoel, and RubinJeffrey Z. (1985), Entrapment in Escalating Conflicts: A Social Psychological Analysis.New York: Springer-Verlag.
11.
ChandyRajesh, and PrabhuJaideep (1998), “How Technology Expectations Drive Radical Innovation Decisions in Dominant and Non-Dominant Firms,” working paper, Department of Marketing, University of Houston.
12.
ChandyRajesh, and TellisGerard (1998), “Organizing for Radical Product Innovation,”MSI Report No. 98–102.Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.
13.
ChristensenClayton M. (1997), The Innovator's Dilemma.Boston: HBS Press.
14.
CohenWesley (1995), “Empirical Studies of Innovative Activity,” in Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change, StonemanPaul, ed. Cambridge, MA: Black-well,182–264.
15.
CopulskyWilliam (1976), “Cannibalism in the Marketplace,”Journal of Marketing, 40(October), 103–105.
16.
DamanpourFariborz (1991), “Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis of Effects of Determinants and Moderators,”Academy of Management Journal, 34(September), 555–90.
17.
DayGeorge (1996), “Using the Past as a Guide to the Future: Reflections on the History of theJournal of Marketing,” Journal of Marketing, 60(Winter), 14–17.
18.
DeshpandéRohit, and WebsterFrederick E.Jr. (1989), “Organizational Culture and Marketing: Defining the Research Agenda,”Journal of Marketing, 53(January), 3–5.
EttlieJ.E., and BridgesW.P., and O'KeefeR.D. (1984), “Organization Strategy and Structural Differences for Radical Versus Incremental Innovation,”Management Science, 30(June), 682–95.
21.
EttlieJ.E., and BridgesW.P., and RubensteinA. (1987), “Firm Size and Product Innovation,”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 4(June), 89–108.
22.
FolkesV. (1988), ‘The Availability Heuristic and Perceived Risk,”Journal of Consumer Research, 15(June), 13–23.
23.
FosterR. (1986), Innovation: The Attacker's Advantage.New York: Summit Books.
24.
GalbraithJ.K. (1952), American Capitalism.Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
25.
GatignonHubert, and XuerebJean-Marc (1997), “Strategic Orientation of the Firm and New Product Performance,”Journal of Marketing Research, 34(February), 77–90.
26.
GeroskiPaul, and MachinSteve, and Van ReenenJohn (1993), “The Profitability of Innovating Firms,”RAND Journal of Economics, 24(Summer), 198–212.
27.
GhemawatPankaj (1991), “Market Incumbency and Technological Inertia,”Marketing Science, 10(Spring), 161–71.
28.
GolderPeter, and TellisGerard (1993), “Pioneer Advantage: Marketing Logic or Marketing Legend?”Journal of Marketing Research, 30(May), 158–62.
29.
GolderPeter, and TellisGerard (1997), “Will It Ever Fly? Modeling the Growth of New Consumer Durables,”Marketing Science, 16(3), 256–70.
30.
GuptaAnil K. (1987), “SBU Strategies, Corporate–SBU Relations, and SBU Effectiveness in Strategy Implementation,”Academy of Management Journal, 30(September), 477–501.
31.
HalalWilliam E., and GeranmayehAli, and PourdehnadJohn (1993), Internal Markets.New York: John Wiley & Sons.
32.
HannanM.T., and FreemanJ. (1977), ‘The Population Ecology of Organizations,”American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 929–64.
33.
HendersonRebecca, and ClarkKim B. (1990), “Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(January), 9–30.
34.
HowellJane M., and HigginsChristopher A. (1990), “Champions of Technological Innovation,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(June), 317–41.
35.
KerinRoger A., HarveyMichael G., and RotheJames T. (1978), “Cannibalism and New Product Development,”Business Horizons, 21(October), 25–31.
36.
KerinRoger A., HarveyMichael G., and PetersonRobert A. (1997), Strategic Marketing Problems: Cases and Comments.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
37.
KleinschmidtElko J., and CooperRobert G. (1991), “The Impact of Product Innovativeness on Performance,”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 8(December), 240–51.
38.
KohliAjay K., and JaworskiBernard J. (1990), “Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions, and Managerial Implications,”Journal of Marketing, 54(2), 1–18.
39.
KohliAjay K., and KumarAjith (1993), “MARKOR: A Measure of Market Orientation,”Journal of Marketing Research, 30(November), 467–78.
40.
LandKenneth (1973), “Identification, Parameter Estimation, and Hypothesis Testing in Recursive Sociological Models,” in Structural Equation Models in the Social Sciences, GoldbergerArthur S., and DuncanOtis D., eds. New York: Seminar Press Inc.,19–48.
41.
LeonardD. (1992), “Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities: A Paradox in Managing New Product Development,”Strategic Management Journal, 13(Summer), 111–25.
42.
MahajanVijay, and WindYoram (1992), “New Product Models: Practice, Shortcomings, and Desired Improvements,”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 9(June), 128–39.
43.
MartinJustin (1995), “Ignore Your Customer,”Fortune, 131(May 1), 123–26.
44.
MasonCharlotte H., and MilneGeorge R. (1994), “An Approach for Identifying Cannibalization Within Product Line Extensions and Multi-Brand Strategies,”Journal of Business Research, 31(October-November), 163–70.
45.
MenonAnil, BharadwajSundar G., and HowellRoy (1996), “The Quality and Effectiveness of Marketing Strategy: Effects of Functional and Dysfunctional Conflict in Intra-Organizational Relationships,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 24(Fall), 299–313.
46.
MitchellW., and SinghK. (1993) “Death of the Lethargic: Effects of Expansion into New Technical Subfields on Performance in a Firm's Base Business,”Organizational Science, 4(May), 152–80.
47.
MoormanChristine (1995), “Organizational Market Information Processes: Cultural Antecedents and New Product Performance,”Journal of Marketing Research, 32(August), 318–35.
48.
MoormanChristine, and MinerAnne S. (1997), “The Impact of Organizational Memory on New Product Performance and Creativity,”Journal of Marketing Research, 34(February), 91–107.
49.
NaultBarrie, and VandenboschMark (1996), “Eating Your Own Lunch: Protection Through Preemption,”Organization Science, 7(May-June), 342–58.
50.
NelsonRichard R., and WinterSidney G. (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
51.
OlsonEric M., WalkerOrville C., and RuekertRobert W. (1995), “Organizing for Effective New Product Development: The Moderating Role of Product Innovativeness,”Journal of Marketing, 59(January), 48–62.
52.
PavittK. (1990), “What We Know About the Strategic Management of Technology,”California Management Review, 32(Spring), 17–26.
53.
PetersThomas J., and WatermanRobert H. (1982), In Search of Excellence: Lessons from America's Best Run Companies.New York: Warner Books.
54.
PriceJames L., and MuellerCharles W. (1986), Handbook of Organizational Measurement.Marshfield, MA: Pitman.
55.
SchererF.M. (1991), “Changing Perspectives on the Firm Size Problem,” in Innovation and Technological Change, AcsZoltan, and AudretschDavid, eds. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf,24–38.
56.
SchererF.M. (1992), “Schumpeter and Plausible Capitalism,”Journal of Economic Literature, 30(September), 1416–33.
57.
SchumpeterJ.A. (1942), Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy.New York: Harper.
58.
SpechtDavid A. (1975), “On the Evaluation of Causal Models,”Social Science Research, 4(2), 113–33.
59.
StawBarry M. (1981), “The Escalation of Commitment to a Course of Action,”Academy of Management Review, 6(October), 577–87.
60.
TauberEdward M. (1974), “How Marketing Discourages Major Innovation,”Business Horizons, 17(June), 22–6.
61.
TellisGerard, and GolderPeter (1996), “First to Market, First to Fail? Real Causes of Enduring Market Leadership,”Sloan Management Review, 32(Winter), 65–75.
62.
TushmanMichael, and AndersonPhilip (1986), “Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(September), 604–33.
63.
TverskyAmos, and KahnemanDaniel (1973), “Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability,”Cognitive Psychology, 5(September), 207–32.
64.
UtterbackJ. (1994), Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation.Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
65.
VizjakAndrej (1994), “Exploiting Your Synergy Potential: Promoting Collaboration Between Business Units,”Long Range Planning, 27(February), 25–35.
66.
WindJerry, and MahajanVijay (1997), “Issues and Opportunities in New Product Development: An Introduction to the Special Issue,”Journal of Marketing Research, 34(February), 1–12.
