Information flowing into a market from firms can stimulate competitive activity and consumer dynamics that ultimately improve the functioning of that market (e.g., improve product quality). However, prior research has provided limited empirical evidence regarding the conditions under which (1) information confers such benefits on the market, (2) firms make strategic use of such information flows, and (3) consumer behavior influences the achievement of these market effects and strategic benefits. The author performs a longitudinal quasi-experiment to investigate these issues using the introduction of the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act (NLEA) as a research context. Results indicate that information did promote consumer dynamics that may have fostered competitive activity among firms. Specifically, marketers changed the quality of base brands and their brand extensions in unique and opposite ways that enabled brands to occupy distinct strategic positions in the market. Market information also influenced the nature of competitive rivalry by shifting price promotion levels depending on the healthy positioning of firm brands. Such approaches were speculated to provide firms with a means of coping with the uncertainty of competitive and consumer reactions to the NLEA, extending theories of the market-level effects of information to include the strategic use of such information by firms.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AikenLeona S., and WestStephen G. (1991), Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions.Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
2.
ArmstrongJ. Scott, and OvertonTerry S. (1977), “Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys,”Journal of Marketing Research, 14(August), 396–402.
3.
BealesHoward, CraswellRichard, and SalopSteven (1981), “The Efficient Regulation of Consumer Information,”Journal of Law and Economics, 24(December), 491–539.
4.
BenhamLee (1972), “The Effect of Advertising on the Price of Eyeglasses,”Journal of Law and Economics, 15(October), 337–52.
5.
BloomPaul (1997), “Studying Consumer Responses to the Changing Information Environment in Health Care: A Research Agenda,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 24, BrucksMerrie, and MacInnisDebbie, eds. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, 360–65.
6.
BloomPaul, and StiffRonald (1980), “Advertising and Health Care Professions,”Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 4(Winter), 642–56.
7.
CadyJohn F. (1976), “An Estimate of the Price Effects of Restrictions on Drug Price Advertising,”Economic Inquiry, 14(December), 493–510.
8.
CampbellDonald T., and StanleyJulian C. (1963), Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research.Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
9.
CaponNoel, and LutzRichard J. (1979), “A Model and Methodology for the Development of Consumer Information Programs,”Journal of Marketing, 43(January), 58–67.
10.
CaponNoel, and LutzRichard J. (1983), “The Marketing of Consumer Information,”Journal of Marketing, 47(Summer), 108–12.
11.
Center for Science in the Public Interest (1994), CSPI Survey Results.Washington, DC: Center for Science in the Public Interest.
12.
ChurchillGilbert A. (1991), Marketing Research: Methodological Foundations, 5th ed. Hinsdale, IL: The Dryden Press.
13.
CohenJacob, and CohenPatricia (1983), Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for Behavioral Sciences.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.
14.
CookThomas D., and CampbellDonald T. (1979), Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings.Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
15.
CronbachLee J. (1987), “Statistical Tests for Moderator Variables: Flaws in Analyses Recently Proposed,”Psychological Bulletin, 1(3), 414–17.
16.
DayRalph, and BodurMuzaffer (1978), “Consumer Response to Dissatisfaction with Services and Intangibles,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 5, Keith HuntH., ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, 263–72.
17.
DunnDonald A., and RayMichael L. (1980), “A Plan for Consumer Information System Development: Implementation and Evaluation,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 7, OlsonJerry C., ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, 250–54.
18.
Federal Trade Commission (1979), Consumer Information Remedies.Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, No. 018-000-00-253-1.
19.
GrønhaugKjell, and ZaltmanGerald (1981), “Complainers and Noncomplainers Revisited: Another Look at the Data,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 8, MonroeKent B., ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, 83–87.
20.
HirschmanAlbert O. (1970), Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21.
Hjorth-AndersonChr. (1984), “The Concept of Quality and Efficiency of Markets for Consumer Products,”Journal of Consumer Research, 11(September), 708–18.
22.
HoustonMichael J., and RothschildMichael L. (1980), “Policy-Related Experiments on Information Provision: A Normative Model and Explication,”Journal of Marketing Research, 17(November), 432–49.
23.
IppolitoPauline M., and MathiosAlan D. (1991), “Health Claims in Food Marketing: Evidence on Knowledge and Behavior in the Cereal Market,”Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 10(Spring), 15–32.
24.
KeppelGeoffrey (1991), Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
25.
KrishnamurthiLakshman, and RajS. P. (1985), “The Effect of Advertising on Consumer Price Sensitivity,”Journal of Marketing Research, 22(May), 119–29.
26.
LevyAlan S., and StokesRaymond C. (1987), “The Effects of Health Promotion Advertising Campaigns on Sales of Ready-to-Eat Cereals,”Public Health Reports, 102(4), 398–403.
27.
MaynesE. Scott, and AssumTerje (1982), “Informationally Imperfect Consumer Markets: Empirical Findings and Policy Implications,”Journal of Consumer Affairs, 16(Summer), 62–87.
28.
MazisMichael B., StaelinRichard, BealesHoward, and SalopSteven (1981), “A Framework for Evaluating Consumer Information Regulation,”Journal of Marketing, 45(Winter), 11–21.
29.
McNeilDennis, and WilkieWilliam (1979), “Public Policy and Consumer Information: Impact of the New Energy Labels,”Journal of Consumer Research, 8(December), 343–54.
30.
MitnickBarry (1981), “The Strategic Uses of Regulation and Deregulation,”Business Horizons, 24(2), 71–83.
31.
MitraAnusree, and LynchJohn G.Jr. (1995), “Toward a Reconciliation of Market Power and Information Theories of Advertising Effects on Price Elasticity,”Journal of Consumer Research, 21(March), 644–59.
32.
MoormanChristine (1990), “The Effects of Stimulus and Consumer Characteristics on the Utilization of Nutrition Information,”Journal of Consumer Research, 17(December), 362–74.
33.
MoormanChristine (1995), “Organizational Market Information Processes: Cultural Antecedents and New Product Outcomes,”Journal of Marketing Research, 32(August), 318–35.
34.
MoormanChristine, and PriceLinda L. (1989), “Consumer Policies Remedies and Consumer Segment Interactions,”Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 8, 181–203.
35.
MyersJames H., and AlpertMark I. (1977), “Semantic Confusion in Attitude Research: Salience Versus Importance Versus Determinance,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 8, PerreaultWilliam D., ed. Atlanta: Association for Consumer Research, 106–10.
36.
NelsonPhilip (1970), “Information and Consumer Behavior,”Journal of Political Economy, 78(March/April), 311–29.
37.
PadbergDaniel I. (1977), “Non-Use Benefits of Mandatory Consumer Information Programs,”Journal of Consumer Policy, 1(January), 5–14.
38.
PedhazurElazar J. (1982), Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research: Explanation and Prediction.New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
39.
PosnerRichard A. (1974), “Theories of Economic Regulation,”Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 5(Autumn), 335–58.
40.
PriceLinda L., FeickLawrence F., and HigieRobin A. (1987), “Information Sensitive Consumers and Market Information,”Journal of Consumer Affairs, 21(Winter), 328–41.
41.
RatchfordBrian, AgrawalJagdish, GrimmPamela E., and SrinivasanNarasimham (1996), “Toward Understanding the Measurement of Market Efficiency,”Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 15(Fall), 167–84.
42.
RichinsMarsha L. (1983), “An Analysis of Consumer Interaction Styles in the Marketplace,”Journal of Consumer Research, 10(June), 73–82.
43.
RichinsMarsha L., and VerhageBronislaw J. (1985), “Seeking Redress for Consumer Dissatisfaction: The Role of Attitudes and Situational Factors,”Journal of Consumer Policy, 8(March), 29–43.
44.
RussoJ. Edward (1987), “Toward Intelligent Product Information Systems for Consumers,”Journal of Consumer Policy, 10(June), 109–38.
45.
RussoJ. Edward, StaelinRichard, NolanCatherine A., RussellGary J., and MetcalfBarbara L. (1986), “Nutrition Information in the Supermarket,”Journal of Consumer Research, 13(June), 48–70.
46.
SalopSteven (1976), “Information and Monopolistic Competition,”American Economic Review, 66(May), 240–45.
47.
SalopSteven (1977), “The Noisy Monopolist: Imperfect Information, Price Dispersion, and Price Discrimination,”Review of Economic Studies, 44(October), 393–406.
48.
SalopSteven, and StiglitzJoseph (1977), “Bargains and Ripoffs: A Model of Monopolistically Competitive Price Dispersion,”Review of Economic Studies, 44(October), 493–510.
49.
ScammonDebra, MayerRobert N., and SmithKen R. (1991), “Alcohol Warnings: How Do you Know When You Have Had One Too Many?”Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 10(Spring), 214–29.
50.
SchererF. M., and RossDavid (1990), Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance.Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
51.
SchwartzAlan, and WildeLouis L. (1985), “Product Quality and Imperfect Information,”Review of Economic Studies,”, 52(2), 251–62.
52.
StiglerGeorge (1961), “The Economics of Information,”Journal of Political Economy, 65(June), 213–25.
53.
StiglerGeorge (1971), “The Theory of Economic Regulation,”Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 2(Spring), 3–21.
54.
StiglitzJoseph E. (1979), “Equilibrium in Product Markets with Imperfect Information,”American Economic Review, 69(May), 339–45.
55.
TellisGerard J., and WernerfeltBirger (1987), “Competitive Price and Quality Under Asymmetric Information,”Marketing Science, 6(Summer), 240–54.
56.
ThorelliHans B. (1971), “Concentration of Information Power Among Consumers,”Journal of Marketing Research, 8(November), 427–32.
57.
ThorelliHans B., and EngledowJack L. (1980), “Information Seekers and Information Systems: A Policy Perspective,”Journal of Marketing, 44(Spring), 9–27.
58.
WarlandRex H., HerrmannRobert O., and MooreDan E. (1984), “Consumer Complaining and Community Involvement: An Exploration of Their Theoretical and Empirical Linkages,”Journal of Consumer Affairs, 18(Summer), 64–78.
59.
WilkieWilliam L. (1982), “Affirmative Disclosure: Perspectives on FTC Orders,”Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 1, 95–110.
60.
WinerB. J., BrownDonald R., and MichelsKenneth M. (1991), Statistical Principles in Experimental Design, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
61.
WonnacottThomas H., and WonnacottRonald J. (1990), Introductory Statistics for Business and Economics, 4th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
62.
WoodDonna J. (1986), Strategic Uses of Public Policy.White Plains, NY: Pitman Publishing.
