BrinbergD., and McGrathJ. E. (1985), Validity and the Research Process.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
2.
GutmanJ., and ReynoldsT. J. (1979), “An Investigation of the Levels of Cognitive Abstraction Utilized by Consumers in Product Differentiation,” in Attitude Research Under the Sun, EighmeyJ., ed. Chicago: American Marketing Association,125–50.
3.
JohnsonB. T., and EaglyA. H. (1989), “The Effects of Involvement on Persuasion: A Meta-Analysis,”Psychological Bulletin, 106, 290–314.
4.
KatzD. (1960), “The Functional Approach to the Study of Attitudes,”Public Opinion Quarterly, 24(2), 163–204.
5.
KrosnickJ. A., BoningerD. S., ChuangY. C., BerentM. K., and CarnotC. G. (1993), “Attitude Strength: One Construct or Many Related Constructs?”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1132–51.
6.
OstromT. M., and BrockT. C. (1968), “A Cognitive Model of Attitudinal Involvement,” in Theories of Cognitive Consistency: A Sourcebook, AbelsonR. P., eds. Chicago: Rand McNally,373–83.
7.
PettyR. E., and CacioppoJ. T. (1990), “Involvement and Persuasion: Tradition Versus Integration,”Psychological Bulletin, 107, 367–74.
8.
PratkanisA. R., BrecklerS. J., and GreenwaldA. G., eds. (1989), Attitude Structure and Function.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9.
ShavittS. (1990), “The Role of Attitude Objects in Attitude Functions,”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 124–48.
10.
ShavittS., SwanS., LowreyT. M., and WankeM. (1994), “The Interaction of Endorser Attractiveness and Involvement in Persuasion Depends on the Goal That Guides Message Processing,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 3, 137–62.
11.
SherifM., and HovlandC.I. (1961), Social Judgment.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
