The authors investigate response patterns to fax surveys in comparison with mail surveys and explore the relative advantages and disadvantages of the two methods. The results of two studies show that the answers to questions sent by fax were comparable to those received by mail, but they were received more quickly and in greater numbers. For many types of surveys that otherwise would have used mail, using fax machines can yield higher returns at lower cost per returned questionnaire.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BeltraminiRichard F., and BlaskoVincent J. (1986), “An Analysis of Award-Winning Headlines,”Journal of Advertising Research, 26(April/May), 48–51.
2.
DicksonJohn P., and MacLachlanDouglas L. (1992), “FAX Surveys,”Marketing Research: A Magazine of Management and Applications, 4(3), 26–30.
3.
FiskeSusan T., and TaylorShelley E. (1984), Social Cognition.New York: Random House.
4.
HelsonHarry (1964), Adaptation Level Theory: An Experimental and Systematic Approach to Behavior.New York: Harper & Row.
5.
HelsenKristiaan, and SchmittleinDavid C. (1993), “Analyzing Duration Times in Marketing: Evidence for the Effectiveness of Hazard Rate Models,”Marketing Science, 12, (Fall), 395–414.
6.
MurphyPaul R., and DaleyJames M. (1995), “Mail Surveys: To Fax or Not to Fax,”Proceedings of the Association of Marketing Theory and Practice Annual Meeting.Chicago: American Marketing Association, 152–57.
7.
NuckolsR. (1964), “The Validity and Comparability of Mail and Personal Interview Surveys,”Journal of Marketing Research, 1(February), 11–16.
8.
RogersTheresa (1976), “Interviews by Telephone and In Person: Quality of Responses and Field Performance,”Public Opinion Quarterly, 40(Spring), 51–56.
9.
SchindlerPamela S. (1986), “Color and Contrast in Magazine Advertising,”Psychology and Marketing, 3(2), 69–78.
10.
SkidgellAlan C., WitryolSam L., and WirzbickPhilip J. (1976), “The Effect of Novelty—Familiarity Levels on Material Reward Preference of First-Grade Children,”The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 128(June), 291–97.
11.
SmockCharles D., and HoltBess G. (1962), “Children's Reactions to Novelty: An Experimental Study of Curiosity Motivation,”Child Development, 33(September), 631–42.
12.
TreismanAnne, and GormicanStephen (1988), “Feature Analysis in Early Vision: Evidence from Search Asymmetries,”Psychological Review, 95(1), 15–47.
13.
VazzanaGary S., and BachmannDuane (1994), “Fax Attracts,”Marketing Research: A Magazine of Management and Applications, 6(Spring), 19–25.
