The authors extend previous research by examining antecedents and consequences of the market intelligence dissemination process across functional boundaries. Their study, involving 788 nonmarketing managers in high-tech equipment manufacturing companies, suggests that both dissemination frequency and formality have nonlinear effects on perceived intelligence quality. In addition, they find evidence of a mere formality effect; that is, intelligence received through formal channels appears to be used more than that obtained through informal channels. The authors also find that the frequency with which market intelligence is disseminated is related to interfunctional distance, joint customer visits, senders’ positional power, a receiver's organizational commitment, and trust in a sender. Additionally they find the formality of the dissemination process is shaped by interfunctional distance, receivers’ trust in senders, and structural flux. Interestingly, the effects of internal environmental volatility (i.e., structural flux) appear to be different from those of external environmental volatility (i.e., market dynamism). For example, structural flux is found to affect dissemination formality, but not frequency, whereas the opposite is true for market dynamism.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AchrolRavi S., and SternLouis W. (1988), “Environmental Determinants of Decision-Making Uncertainty in Marketing Channels,”Journal of Marketing Research, 25(February), 36–50.
2.
AguilarFrances (1967), Scanning Business Environments.New York: Macmillan.
3.
AikenLeona S., and WestStephen G. (1991), Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions.Newbury, CA: Sage Publications.
4.
AndersonCathy, CiarloJames, and BrodieSusan (1981), “Measuring Evaluation-Induced Change in Mental Health Programs,” in Utilizing Evaluation: Concepts and Measurement Techniques, GarloJames, ed. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications,97–124.
5.
AndersonErin, and WeitzBarton (1989), “Determinants of Continuity in Conventional Industrial Channel Dyads,”Marketing Science, 8(4), 310–23.
6.
BlairRebecca, RobertsKarlene, and McKechniePamela (1985), “Vertical and Network Communications: The Present and Future,” in Organizational Communication: Traditional Themes and New Directions, McPheeR., and TompkinsP., eds. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications,55–78.
7.
BlauPeter M. (1964), Exchange and Power in Social Life.New York: John Wiley & Sons.
8.
CaplanN., MorrisonA., and StambaughR. (1975), The Use of Social Science Knowledge in Policy Decisions and the National Level.Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
9.
CiarloJames A. (1981), Utilizing Evaluation: Concepts and Measurement Techniques.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
10.
DaftR. L., and LengelR. H. (1984), “Information Richness: A New Approach to Managerial Behavior and Organizational Design,”Research in Organizational Behavior, 6, 191–233.
11.
DanielCuthbert, and WoodFred S. (1980), Fitting Equations to Data.New York: John Wiley & Sons.
12.
DeshpandeRohit, and ZaltmanGerald (1982), “Factors Affecting the Use of Market Research: A Path Analysis,”Journal of Marketing Research, 19(February), 14–31.
13.
DeshpandeRohit, and ZaltmanGerald (1984), “A Comparison of Factors Affecting the Perceptions of Market Research Use,”Journal of Marketing Research, 21(February), 32–38.
14.
DeshpandeRohit, and ZaltmanGerald (1987), “A Comparison of Factors Affecting Use of Market Information in Consumer and Industrial Firms,”Journal of Marketing Research, 24(February), 114–18.
15.
DunnWilliam (1986), “Studying Knowledge Use: A Profile of Procedures and Issues,” in Knowledge, Generation, Exchange, and Utilization, BealGeorge, DissanayakeWimal, and KonoshimaSumiye, eds. Boulder, CO: The Westview Press.
16.
FerryDiane L., and Van de VenAndrew H. (1980), Measuring and Assessing Organizations.New York: John Wiley & Sons.
17.
FisherAubrey B. (1978), Perspectives on Human Communication.New York: Macmillan Publishing.
18.
FiskeSusan T., and TaylorShelley E. (1991), Social Cognition.New York: McGraw Hill.
19.
FrazierGary L., and SummersJohn O. (1984), “Interfirm Influence Strategies and Their Application Within Distribution Channels,”Journal of Marketing, 48(Summer), 43–55.
20.
FreyDieter, and RoschMarita (1984), “Information Seeking After Decisions: The Roles of Novelty of Information and Decision Irreversibility,”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10(1), 91–98.
21.
GerbingDavid W., and AndersonJames C. (1988), “An Updated Paradigm for Scale Development Incorporating Unidimensionality and Its Assessment,”Journal of Marketing Research, 25(May), 186–92.
22.
GuptaAshok K., and WilemonDavid (1988), “Why R&D Resists Using Market Intelligence,”Research Technology Management, 31(6), 36–41.
23.
HuberGeorge (1982), “Organizational Information Systems: Determinants of Their Performance and Behavior,”Management Science, 2(February), 138–55.
24.
HuberGeorge, and DaftRichard L. (1987), “The Information Environments of Organizations” in Handbook of Organizational Communication: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, JablinFrederic M., PutnamLinda L., RobertsKarlene H., and PorterLyman W., eds. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications,11–18.
25.
HuberGeorge, and McDanielRueben R. (1986), “The Decision Making Paradigm of Organizational Design,”Management Science, 32(5), 572–89.
26.
IntriligatorMichael D. (1978), Econometric Models, Techniques and Applications.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
27.
JaworskiBernard J., and KohliAjay K. (1993), “Market Orientation: Antecedents and Consequences,”Journal of Marketing, 57(July), 53–70.
28.
JohnGeorge, and MartinJohn (1984), “Effects of Organizational Structure of Marketing Planning on Credibility and Utilization of Plan Output,”Journal of Marketing Research, 21(May), 170–83.
29.
Kohli AjayK., and JaworskiBernard J. (1990), “Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions, and Managerial Implications,”Journal of Marketing, 54(April), 1–18.
30.
LeeHanjoon, AcitoFrank, and DayRalph L. (1987), “Evaluation and Use of Marketing Research by Decision Makers: A Behavioral Simulation,”Journal of Marketing Research, 24(May), 187–96.
31.
McGeeGail W., and FordRobert C. (1987), “Two (or More?) Dimensions of Organizational Commitment: Reexamination of the Affective and Continuance Commitment Scales,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(4), 638–42.
32.
McQuarrieE. F., and McIntyreS. H. (1992), The Customer Visit: An Emerging Practice in Business-to-Business Marketing, Report No. 92–114. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.
33.
MeierR. L. (1963), Communication Overload: Proposals From a Study of a University Library,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(March), 38–50.
34.
MenonAnil, and Rajan VaradarajanP. (1992), “A Model of Marketing Knowledge Use Within Firms,”Journal of Marketing, 56(4), 53–71.
35.
MintzbergH. (1983), Power in and Around Organizations.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
36.
MohrJakki, and NevinJohn R. (1990), “Communication Strategies in Marketing Channels: A Theoretical Perspective,”Journal of Marketing, 54(October), 36–50.
37.
MontgomeryDavid B., and WeinbergCharles B. (1979), “Toward Strategic Intelligence Systems,”Journal of Marketing, 43(Fall), 41–52.
38.
MoormanChristine, ZaltmanGerald, and DeshpandeRohit (1992), “Relationships Between Providers and Users of Market Research: The Dynamics of Trust Within and Between Organizations,”Journal of Marketing Research, 29(August), 314–28.
39.
MoormanChristine, DeshpandeRohit, and ZaltmanGerald (1993), “Factors Affecting Trust in Market Research Relationships,”Journal of Marketing, 57(January), 81–101.
40.
MorganRobert M., and HuntShelby D. (1994), “Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing,”Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20–38.
41.
O'ReillyCharles A. (1978), “The Intentional Distortion of Information in Organizational Communication: A Laboratory and Field Approach,”Human Relations, 31(2), 173–93.
42.
O'ReillyCharles A. (1982), “Variations in Decision Makers’ Use of Information Sources: The Impact of Quality and Accessibility of Information,”Academy of Management Journal, 25(4), 756–71.
43.
O'ReillyCharles A., and PondyLouis R. (1979), “Organizational Communication,” in Organizational Behavior, KerrStephen, ed. Columbus, OH: Grid, 119–49.
44.
PfefferJeffrey (1981), Power in Organizations.Marshfield, MA: Pitman.
45.
RichRobert (1977), “Uses of Social Science Information by Federal Bureaucrats: Knowledge for Action Versus Knowledge for Understanding,” in Using Social Research in Public Policy Making, WeissCarol, ed. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books,199–211.
46.
RuekertRobert W., and WalkerOrville C.Jr. (1987), “Marketing's Interaction with Other Functional Units: A Conceptual Model and Empirical Evidence,”Journal of Marketing, 51(January), 1–19.
47.
SchwenkC. R. (1984), “Cognitive Simplification Processes in Strategic Decision Making,”Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 111–28.
48.
ShuklaR. K. (1982), “Influences of Power Bases in Organizational Decision Making: A Contingency Model,”Decision Sciences, 13(July), 450–70.
49.
SlaterStanley F., and NarverJohn C. (1994), “Does Competitive Environment Moderate the Market Orientation-Performance Relationship?”Journal of Marketing, 58(January), 46–55.
50.
SouderWilliam E. (1977), An Exploratory Study of the Coordinating Mechanisms Between R&D and Marketing as an Influence on the Innovation Process, Final Report to the National Science Foundation Pittsburgh, School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh.
51.
SouderWilliam E. (1988), “Managing Relations Between R&D and Marketing in New Product Development Projects,”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 5(1), 6–19.
52.
StarbuckWilliam H., and MillikenFrances J. (1988), “Executive Perceptual Filters: What they Notice and How They Make Sense” in The Executive Effect: Concepts and Methods for Studying Top Managers, HambrickDonald, ed. Greenwich CT: JAI Press,35–66.
53.
StohlCynthia, and Charles ReddingW. (1987), “Messages and Message Exchange Processes,” in Handbook of Organizational Communication: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, JablinFrederic M., PutnamLinda L., RobertsKarlene H., and PorterLyman W., eds. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications,451–502.
54.
Van de VenAndrew H., and FerryDiane L. (1980), Measuring and Assessing Organizations.New York: John Wiley & Sons.
55.
WalshJames P. (1988), “Selectivity and Selective Perception: An Investigation of Managers’ Belief Structures and Information Processing,”Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 873–96.
56.
WiltonPeter C., and MyersJohn G. (1986), “Task, Expectancy, and Information Assessment Effects in Information Utilization Processes,”Journal of Consumer Research, 12(March), 469–85.
57.
WorkmanJohn P.Jr. (1993), “Marketing's Limited Role in New Product Development in One Computer Systems Firm,”Journal of Marketing Research, 30(November), 405–21.
58.
YuklGary, and FalbeCecilia M. (1991), “Importance of Different Power Sources in Downward and Lateral Relations,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(3), 416–23
