Surveys in marketing often ask one member of a household what other members think of a new product idea or what their preferences are in terms of existing products and brands. The authors investigate the strategies proxy-reporters use to answer such questions and how close they come to what the target respondents themselves answer. They find that as the extent to which a couple talks to each other or participates in an activity together increases, proxy-reporters tend to use more specific information about the target respondent, and the convergence between self- and proxy-reports tends to increase. Furthermore, as the extent of participation/discussion increases, the strategies used to arrive at self- and proxy-reports become more similar. Implications for improving the quality and cost-effectiveness of survey research are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BernDaryl J. (1972), “Self-Perception Theory,” in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, BerkowitzL., ed. New York: Academic Press,1–62.
2.
BickartBarbara A., and BlairJohnny, MenonGeeta, and SudmanSeymour (1990), “Cognitive Aspects of Proxy-reporting of Behavior,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 17, GoldbergMarvin E., and GornGerald, and PollayRichard W., eds. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research,198–206.
3.
BickartBarbara A., and MenonGeeta, SudmanSeymour, and BlairJohnny (1992), “The Effects of Discussion on the Accuracy of and Convergence Between Self and Proxy Reports,” paper presented at the American Association for Public Opinion Research Conference, St. Petersburg, FL.
4.
BlairEdward, and BurtonScott (1987), “Cognitive Processes Used by Survey-Respondents to Answer Behavioral Frequency Questions,”Journal of Consumer Research, 14(September), 280–88.
5.
BrewerWilliam F. (1988), “Memory for Randomly Sampled Autobiographical Events,” in Remembering Reconsidered: Ecological and Traditional Approaches to the Study of Memory, NeisserUlric, and WinogradEugene, eds. New York: Cambridge University Press,21–90.
6.
BowerGordon H., and GilliganS. G. (1979), “Remembering Information Related to One's Self,”Journal of Research in Personality, 13, 420–32.
7.
BurtonScot, and BlairEdward (1991), ‘Task Conditions, Response Formulation Processes, and Response Accuracy for Behavioral Frequency Questions in Surveys,”Public Opinion Quarterly, 55(Spring) 1, 50–79.
8.
CorfmanKim P. (1991), “Perceptions of Relative Influence: Formation and Measurement,”Journal of Marketing Research, 28(May), 125–36.
9.
DavisHarry L. (1970), “Dimensions of Marital Roles in Consumer Decision Making,”Journal of Marketing Research,1(May), 168–77.
10.
DavisHarry L. (1971), “Measurement of Husband-Wife Influence in Consumer Purchase Decisions,”Journal of Marketing Research, 8(August), 305–12.
11.
DouglasSusan P., and WindYoram (1979), “Examining Family Role and Authority Patterns: Two Methodological Issues,”Journal of Marriage and Family, (February), 35–47.
12.
FeldmanJack M., and LynchJohn G. (1988), “Self-Generated Validity: Effects of Measurement on Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(August), 421–35.
13.
GranboisDonald H., and WilletRonald P. (1970), “Equivalence of Family-Roles Measures Based on Husband and Wife Data,”Journal of Marriage and Family, (February), 68–72.
14.
KleinStanley B., and KihlstromJohn F. (1986), “Elaboration, Organization, and the Self-Reference Effect in Memory,”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115/1, 26–38.
15.
KleinStanley B., and LoftusJudith (1993), “The Mental Representation of Trait and Autobiographical Knowledge About the Self,” in The Mental Representation of Trait and Autobiographical Knowledge About the Self, Advances in Social Cognition, Vol. 5, SrullThomas K., and WyerRobert S.Jr. eds. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,1–50.
16.
KleinStanley B., and LoftusJudith, and BurtonHolly A. (1989), “Two Self-Reference Effects: The Importance of Distinguishing Between Self-Descriptiveness Judgments and Autobiographical Retrieval in Self-Referent Encoding,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(June), 853–65.
17.
KojetinBrian A., and MillerLeslie A. (1993), “The Intrahousehold Communications Study: Estimating the Accuracy of Proxy Responses at the Dyadic Level,” paper presented at the 1993 Annual Conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, St. Charles, IL.
18.
LarsenSteen F. (1985), “Specific Background Knowledge and Knowledge Updating,” in Foregrounding Background, All-woodJens, and HjelmquistErland, eds. Doxa, 25–36.
19.
LintonMarigold (1982), “Transformations of Memory in Everyday Life,” in Memory Observed: Remembering in Natural Contexts, NeisserUlric, ed. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Company,77–92.
20.
McLeodJack M., and ChaffeeSteven R. (1972), “The Construction of Social Reality,” in The Social Influence Process, TedeschiJ., ed. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.
21.
MenonGeeta (1993), “The Effects of Accessibility of Information in Memory on Judgments of Behavioral Frequencies,”Journal of Consumer Research, 20(December), 431–40.
22.
MonroePamela A., BokemeierJanet L., and Morley KotchenJ., and McKeanHartley (1985), “Spousal Response Consistency in Decision-Making Research,”Journal of Marriage and the Family, (August), 733–38.
23.
MooreJeffrey C. (1988), “Self/Proxy Response Status and Survey Response Quality,”Journal of Official Statistics, 4(2), 155–72.
24.
PeterPaul J., ChurchillGilbert A.Jr., and BrownTom J. (1992), “Caution in the Use of Difference Scores in Consumer Research,”Journal of Consumer Research, 19(March), 655–62.
25.
PrenticeDeborah A. (1990), “Familiarity and Differences in Self-and Other-Representations,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(3), 369–83.
26.
QuarmDaisy (1981), “Random Measurement Error as a Source of Discrepancies Between the Reports of Wives and Husbands Concerning Marital Power and Task Allocation,”Journal of Marriage and Family, (August), 521–35.
27.
ReiserBrian J., BlackJohn B., and AbelsonRobert P. (1985), “Knowledge Structures in the Organization and Retrieval of Autobiographical Memories,”Cognitive Psychology, 17, 89–137.
28.
RogersT. B., and KuiperN. A., and KirkerW. S. (1977), “Self-Reference and the Encoding of Personal Information,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 677–88.
29.
SchwarzNorbert (1990), “Assessing Frequency Reports of Mundane Behavior: Contribution of Cognitive Psychology to Questionnaire Construction,” in Research Methods in Personality and Social Psychology, HendrickClyde, and ClarkMargaret S., eds. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications,98–119.
30.
SilkAlvin J., and KalwaniManohar U. (1982), “Measuring Influence in Organizational Purchase Decisions,”Journal of Marketing Research, 19(May), 165–81.
31.
Van EsJ.C., and ShingiP. M. (1972), “Response Consistency of Husband and Wife for Selected Attitudinal Items,”Journal of Marriage and the Family, (November), 741–49.
32.
WagenaarWillem A. (1986), “My Memory: A Study of Autobiographical Memory Over Six Years,”Cognitive Psychology, 18, 225–52.
33.
WhiteRichard T. (1982), “Memory for Personal Events,”Human Learning, 1, 171–83.
