Associations to a contextual cue were contrasted with those of an advertised object when the cognitive resources devoted to message processing were substantial and when the categories to which the contextual cue and the advertised object belonged displayed low overlap. The absence of either of these factors prompted assimilation. A two-factor theory is offered to explain these outcomes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CoxDonald F. (1967), Risk Taking and Information Handling in Consumer Behavior, Boston, MA: Harvard University, Division of Research.
2.
GreenwaldAnthony G. (1968), “Cognitive Learning, Cognitive Response to Persuasion Attitude Change,” in Psychological Foundations of Attitudes, GreenwaldAnthony G., BrockTimothy C., and OstromThomas M., eds. New York: Academic Press, 147–70.
3.
HerrPaul M., ShermanSteven J., and FazioRussell H. (1983), “On the Consequences of Priming: Assimilation and Contrast Effects,”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19(July), 323–40.
4.
HerrPaul M. (1986), “Consequences of Priming: Judgment and Behavior,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(December), 1106–15.
5.
HerrPaul M. (1989), “Priming Price: Prior Knowledge and Context Effects,”Journal of Consumer Research, 16(June), 67–75.
6.
KelmanH. C., and CohlerJ. (1959), “Reactions to Pervasive Communication as a Function of Cognitive Needs and Styles,” paper presented at meetings of the Eastern Psychological Association, Atlantic City, NJ, (April 3).
7.
LombardiWendy J., Tory HigginsE., and BarghJohn A. (1987), “The Role of Consciousness in Priming Effects on Categorization: Assimilation Versus Contrast as a Function of Awareness of the Priming Task,”Personality and Social Psychology, 13(September), 411–29.
8.
LynchJohn G., ChakravartiDipankar, and MitraAnusree (1991), “Contrast Effects in Consumer Judgments: Changes in Mental Representations or in the Anchoring of Rating Scales?”Journal of Consumer Research, 18(December), 284–97.
9.
ManisMelvin, NelsonThomas E., and ShedlerJonathan (1988), “Stereotypes and Social Judgments: Extremity Assimilation and Contrast,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(July), 28–36.
10.
MartinLeonard (1986), “Set/Reset: Use and Disuse of Conception Impression Formation,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(September), 493–504.
11.
MartinLeonard, SetaJohn J., and CreliaRick A. (1990), “Assimilation and Contrast as a Function of People's Willingness and Ability to Expend Effort in Forming an Impression,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(July), 27–37.
12.
SherifMuzifer, and HovlandCarl I. (1961), Social Judgment: Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Communication and Attitude Change.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
13.
ShimpTerence A., StuartElnora W., and EngleRandall W. (1991), “A Program of Classical Conditioning Experiments Testing Variations in the Conditioned Stimulus and Contents,”Journal of Consumer Research, 18(June), 1–12.
14.
StrackF., SchwarzN., and GschneidingerE. (1985), “Happiness and Reminiscing: The Role of Time Perspective, Affect, and Mode of Thinking,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(December), 1460–69.
15.
WilderD. A., and ThompsonJ. E. (1988), “Assimilation and Contrast Effects in the Judgments of Groups,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, (January), 62–73.
