Several studies have shown that pioneers have long-lived market share advantages and are likely to be market leaders in their product categories. However, that research has potential limitations: the reliance on a few established databases, the exclusion of nonsurvivors, and the use of single-informant self-reports for data collection. The authors of this study use an alternate method, historical analysis, to avoid these limitations. Approximately 500 brands in 50 product categories are analyzed. The results show that almost half of market pioneers fail and their mean market share is much lower than that found in other studies. Also, early market leaders have much greater long-term success and enter an average of 13 years after pioneers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AakerDavid A., and DayGeorge S. (1986), “The Perils of High-Growth Markets,”Strategic Management Journal, 7 (September-October), 409–21.
2.
AbellDerek F. (1978), “Strategic Windows,”Journal of Marketing, 42 (July), 21–8.
3.
Advertising Age (1983), “Study: Majority of 25 Leaders in 1923 Still On Top” (September 19), 32.
4.
AlpertFrank H., KaminsMichael A., and GrahamJohn L. (1992), “An Examination of Reseller Buyer Attitudes Toward Order of Brand Entry,”Journal of Marketing, 56 (July), 25–37.
5.
BainJoe S. (1956), Barriers to New Competition.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6.
BondR. S., and LeanD. F. (1977), “Sales, Promotion, and Product Differentiation in Two Prescription Drug Markets.”Washington, DC: U.S. Federal Trade Commission.
7.
BoozAllen, & Hamilton (1982), New Product Management for the 1980's.New York: Booz, Allen & Hamilton.
8.
BuzzellRobert D., and GaleBradley T. (1987), The PIMS Principles: Linking Strategy to Performance.New York: The Free Press.
9.
CarpenterGregory S., and NakamotoKent (1989), “Consumer Preference Formation and Pioneering Advantage,”Journal of Marketing Research, 26 (August), 285–98.
10.
ChandlerAlfred D. (1990), “The Enduring Logic of Industrial Success,”Harvard Business Review, 68 (March-April), 131–9.
11.
CooperRobert G. (1979), “The Dimensions of Industrial New Product Success and Failure,”Journal of Marketing, 43 (Summer), 93–103.
12.
DayGeorge S., and FreemanJonathan S. (1990), “Burnout or Fadeout: The Risks of Early Entry Into High Technology Markets,” in Strategic Management in High Technology Firms, LawlessMichael W., and Gomez-MejiaLuis R., eds. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, Inc., 43–65.
13.
DayGeorge S., ShockerAllan D., and SrivastavaRajendra K. (1979), “Customer-Oriented Approaches to Identifying Product-Markets,”Journal of Marketing, 43 (Fall), 8–19.
14.
FershtmanChaim, MahajanVijay, and MullerEitan (1990), “Market Share Pioneering Advantage: A Theoretical Approach,”Management Science, 36 (August), 900–18.
15.
FreibergerPaul, and SwaineMichael (1984), Fire in the Valley: The Making of the Personal Computer.Berkeley CA: Osborne/McGraw-Hill.
16.
GilbertR. J., and NewberryD. M. G. (1982), “Preemptive Patenting and the Persistence of Monopoly,”American Economic Review, 72 (June), 514–26.
17.
GlazerA. (1985), “The Advantages of Being First,”American Economic Review, 75 (June), 473–80.
18.
GolderPeter N., and TellisGerard J. (1992), “Do Pioneers Really Have Long-Term Advantages: A Historical Analysis,” Marketing Science Institute Working Paper. Boston: Marketing Science Institute.
19.
GottschalkLouis R. (1969), Understanding History: A Primer of Historical Method.New York: Knopf.
20.
GuaschJ. L., and WeissA. (1980), “Adverse Selection of Markets and the Advantages of Being Late,”Quarterly Journal of Economics, 94 (May), 453–66.
21.
KarakayaFahri, and StahlMichael J. (1989), “Barriers to Entry and Market Entry Decisions in Consumer and Industrial Goods Markets,”Journal of Marketing, 53 (April), 80–91.
22.
LambkinMary (1988), “Order of Entry and Performance in New Markets,”Strategic Management Journal, 9 (Summer), 127–40.
23.
LambkinMary, and DayGeorge S. (1989), “Evolutionary Processes in Competitive Markets: Beyond the Product Life Cycle,”Journal of Marketing, 53 (July), 4–20.
24.
LaneW. J. (1980), “Product Differentiation in a Market With Endogenous Sequential Entry,”Bell Journal of Economics, 11 (Spring), 237–60.
25.
LiebermanMarvin B., and MontgomeryDavid B. (1988), “First-Mover Advantages,”Strategic Management Journal, 9 (Summer), 41–58.
26.
LilienGary L., and YoonEunsang (1990), “The Timing of Competitive Market Entry: An Exploratory Study of New Industrial Products,”Management Science, 36 (May), 568–85.
27.
LokenBarbara, and WardJames (1990), “Alternative Approaches to Understanding the Determinants of Typicality,”Journal of Consumer Research, 17 (September), 111–26.
28.
LouisJ. C., and YazijianHarvey (1980), The Cola Wars.New York: Everest House.
29.
MooreMichael J., BouldingWilliam, and GoodsteinRonald C. (1991), “Pioneering and Market Share: Is Entry Time Endogenous and Does It Matter?”Journal of Marketing Research, 28 (February), 97–104.
30.
NevettTerence (1991), “Historical Investigation and the Practice of Marketing,”Journal of Marketing, 55 (July), 13–23.
31.
ParryMark, and BassFrank M. (1990), “When To Lead or Follow? It Depends,”Marketing Letters, 1 (November), 187–98.
32.
PrescottE., and VisscherM. (1977), “Sequential Location Among Firms With Foresight,”Bell Journal of Economics, 8 (Autumn), 378–93.
33.
RatneshwarS., and ShockerAllan D. (1991), “Substitution in Use and the Role of Usage Context in Product Category Structures,”Journal of Marketing Research, 28 (August), 281–95.
34.
RobinsonWilliam T. (1988), “Sources of Market Pioneer Advantages: The Case of Industrial Goods Industries,”Journal of Marketing Research, 25 (February), 87–94.
35.
RobinsonWilliam T., and FornellClaes (1985), “Sources of Market Pioneer Advantage in Consumer Goods Industries,”Journal of Marketing Research, 22 (August), 305–17.
36.
SavittRonald (1980), “Historical Research in Marketing,”Journal of Marketing, 44 (Fall), 52–8.
37.
SchererF. M. (1985), “Editorial: Post-Patent Barriers to Entry in the Pharmaceutical Industry,”Journal of Health Economics, 4 (March), 83–7.
38.
SchmalenseeRichard (1978), “Entry Deterrence in the Ready to Eat Breakfast Cereal Industry,”Bell Journal of Economics, 9 (Autumn), 305–27.
SchnaarsSteven P. (1986), “When Entering Growth Markets, Are Pioneers Better Than Poachers?”Business Horizons, 29 (March-April), 27–36.
41.
ShurkinJoel N. (1984), Engines of the Mind: A History of the Computer.New York: Norton.
42.
SpenceM. (1977), “Entry, Capacity, Investment, and Oligopolistic Pricing,”Bell Journal of Economics, 8 (Autumn), 534–44.
43.
SpenceM. (1981), “The Learning Curve and Competition,”Bell Journal of Economics, 12 (Spring), 49–70.
44.
SujanMita, and BettmanJames R. (1989), “The Effects of Brand Positioning Strategies on Consumers’ Brand and Category Perceptions: Some Insights From Schema Research,”Journal of Marketing Research, 26 (November), 454–67.
45.
SullivanMary (1991), “Brand Extension and Order of Entry,” Marketing Science Institute Working Paper, Report Number 91-105. Boston: Marketing Science Institute.
46.
UrbanGlen L., CarterTheresa, GaskinSteven, and MuchaZofia (1986), “Market Share Rewards to Pioneering Brands: An Empirical Analysis and Strategic Implications,”Management Science, 32 (June), 645–59.
47.
Van HonackerWilfried R., and DayDiana (1987), “Cross-Sectional Estimation in Marketing: Direct Versus Reverse Regression,”Marketing Science, 6 (Summer), 254–67.
48.
WhittenIra T. (1979), “Brand Performance in the Cigarette Industry and the Advantages of Early Entry.”Washington, DC: U.S. Federal Trade Commission.
49.
YipGeorge S. (1982), Barriers to Entry.Lexington, MA: Lexington Books/D.C. Heath and Company.
