Using an experimental design, the authors explore organizational consequences and ethical issues in salesforce supervision. The findings suggest that managers’ decisions to either discipline or reward the behavior of salespeople are guided primarily by the inherent rightness or wrongness of the salespeople's behaviors (deontological considerations) and only secondarily by the consequences of the behaviors on the organization (teleological factors). The results have implications for salesforce supervision, the P-utility maximization thesis, Etzioni's moderate deontology, and the Hunt-Vitell theory of ethics.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AkaahIsmael P., and RiordanEdward A. (1989), “Judgments of Marketing Professionals About Ethical Issues in Marketing Research: A Replication and Extension,”Journal of Marketing Research, 26 (February), 112–20.
2.
AndersonErin, LodishLeonard M., and WeitzBarton A. (1987), “Resource Allocation Behavior in Conventional Channels,”Journal of Marketing Research, 24 (February), 85–97.
3.
AndersonErin, and OliverRichard L. (1987), “Perspectives on Behavior-Based Versus Outcome-Based Salesforce Control Systems,”Journal of Marketing, 51 (October), 76–88.
4.
ArmstrongJ. Scott, and OvertonJerry S. (1977), “Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys,”Journal of Marketing Research, 14 (August), 396–402.
5.
BellizziJoseph A., and HiteRobert E. (1989), “Supervising Unethical Salesforce Behavior,”Journal of Marketing, 53 (April), 36–47.
6.
BlasiAugusto (1980), “Bridging Moral Cognition and Moral Action: A Critical Review of the Literature,”Psychological Bulletin, 88 (July), 1–45.
7.
CrawfordC. Merle (1970), “Attitudes of Marketing Executives Toward Ethics in Marketing Research,”Journal of Marketing, 34 (April), 46–52.
8.
DubinskyAlan J., and IngramThomas N. (1984), “Correlates of Salespeople's Ethical Conflict: An Exploratory Investigation,”Journal of Business Ethics, 3 (November), 343–53.
9.
DwyerF. Robert, SchurrPaul H., and OhSejo (1987), “Developing Buyer-Seller Relationships,”Journal of Marketing, 51 (April), 11–27.
10.
EtzioniAmitai (1988), The Moral Dimension: Toward a New Economics.New York: The Free Press.
11.
FerrellO. C., and GreshamLarry G. (1985), “A Contingency Framework for Understanding Ethical Decision Making in Marketing,”Journal of Marketing, 49 (Summer), 87–96.
12.
FerrellO. C., GreshamLarry G., and FraedrichJohn (1989), “A Synthesis of Ethical Decision Models for Marketing,”Journal of Macromarketing, 9 (Fall), 55–64.
13.
FerrellO. C., and SkinnerSteven J. (1988), “Ethical Behavior and Bureaucratic Structure in Marketing Research Organizations,”Journal of Marketing Research, 25 (February), 103–9.
14.
FerrellO. C., and Mark WeaverK. (1978), “Ethical Beliefs of Marketing Managers,”Journal of Marketing, 42 (July), 69–73.
15.
FrankenaWilliam (1963), Ethics.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
16.
FritzscheDavid J. (1988), “An Examination of Marketing Ethics: Role of the Decision Maker, Consequences of the Decision, Management Position, and Sex of the Respondent,”Journal of Macromarketing, 8 (Fall), 29–39.
17.
HuntShelby D. (1990), “Commentary on an Empirical Examination of a General Theory of Marketing Ethics,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 18 (Spring), 173–7.
18.
HuntShelby D., ChonkoLawrence B., and WilcoxJames B. (1984), “Ethical Problems of Marketing Researchers,”Journal of Marketing Research, 21 (August), 309–24.
19.
HuntShelby D., and VitellScott (1986), “A General Theory of Marketing Ethics,”Journal of Macromarketing, 6 (Spring), 5–16.
20.
HuntShelby D., WoodVan R., and ChonkoLawrence B. (1989), “Corporate Ethical Values and Organizational Commitment in Marketing,”Journal of Marketing, 53 (July), 79–90.
21.
JansenErik, and GlinowMary Ann Von (1985), “Ethical Ambivalence and Organizational Reward Systems,”Academy of Management Review, 10 (October), 814–22.
22.
JohnGeorge (1984), “An Empirical Investigation of Some Antecendents of Opportunism in a Marketing Channel,”Journal of Marketing Research, 21 (August), 278–89.
23.
LaczniakGene R., and MurphyPatrick E. (1985), “Incorporating Marketing Ethics Into the Organization,” in Marketing Ethics, LaczniakGene R., and MurphyPatrick E., eds. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath and Company,97–105.
24.
MoormanChristine (1990), “Book Review: The Moral Dimension: Toward a New Economics,”Journal of Marketing, 54 (July), 114–16.
25.
NeterJohn, WassermanWilliam, and KutnerMichael H. (1985), Applied Linear Regression Models.Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.
26.
RestJames R. (1986), Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory.New York: Praeger Publishers.
27.
RobideauxDouglas R., RobinDonald P., and Eric ReidenbachR. (1989), “An Examination of Demographic Variables Associated With Ethical Behaviors and Perceptions of Retailers,” in Developments in Marketing Science, Vol. 12, Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Conference of the Academy of Marketing Science, HawesJon M., and ThanopoulosJohn, eds., Orlando, FL (May 17-20), 235–8.
28.
RobinDonald P., and Eric ReidenbachR. (1987), “Social Responsibility, Ethics, and Marketing Strategy: Closing the Gap Between Concept and Application,”Journal of Marketing, 51 (January), 44–58.
29.
RossiPeter H., WrightJames D., and AndersonAndy B. (1983), Handbook of Survey Research.New York: Academic Press, Inc.
30.
WotrubaThomas R. (1990), “A Comprehensive Framework for the Analysis of Ethical Behavior, With a Focus on Sales Organizations,”Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 10 (Spring), 29–42.
