The author examines how rating a brand on specific attributes early in a survey affects responses to a later overall brand evaluation. Specifically, she investigates the conditions under which respondents’ answers to a brand evaluation are likely to be consistent with a previous attribute rating (carryover effect) versus inconsistent (backfire effect). In a laboratory experiment, the occurrence of carryover and backfire was related to the respondent's level of subjective product knowledge and the diagnosticity of the attribute rating for the brand evaluation. Implications of these findings for questionnaire design and measurement of consumers’ attitudes are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ajzenleek, and FishbeinMartin (1977), “Attitude-Behavior Relations: A Theoretical Analysis and Review of Empirical Research,”Psychological Bulletin, 84 (5), 888–918.
2.
AlbaJoseph W., and Wesley HutchinsonJ. (1987), “Dimensions of Consumer Expertise,”Journal of Consumer Research, 13 (March), 411–54.
3.
BickartBarbara A. (1992), “Question-Order Effects and Brand Evaluations: The Moderating Role of Consumer Knowledge,” in Context Effects in Social and Psychological Research, SchwarzN., and SudmanS., eds. New York: Springer-Verlag.
4.
BoltonRuth N., and DrewJames H. (1991), “A Multistage Model of Customers’ Assessments of Service Quality and Value,”Journal of Consumer Research, 17 (March), 375–84.
5.
BrucksMerrie (1985), “The Effects of Product Class Knowledge on Information Search Behavior,”Journal of Consumer Research, 12 (June), 1–16.
6.
CelsiRichard L., and OlsonJerry C. (1988), “The Role of Involvement in Attention and Comprehension Processes,”Journal of Consumer Research, 15 (September), 210–24.
7.
CohenJacob (1988), Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
FazioRussell H., LennTracy M., and EffreinEdwin A. (1984), “Spontaneous Attitude Formation,”Social Cognition, 2 (3), 217–34.
10.
FeldmanJack M., and LynchJohn G.Jr. (1988), “Self-Generated Validity: Effects of Measurement on Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 73 (August), 421–35.
11.
HauserJohn R., and ClausingDon (1988), “The House of Quality,”Harvard Business Review, 66 (May-June), 63–73.
12.
HerrPaul M. (1989), “Priming Price: Prior Knowledge and Context Effects,”Journal of Consumer Research, 16 (June), 67–75.
13.
HerrPaul M., ShermanSteven J., and FazioRussell H. (1983), “On the Consequences of Priming: Assimilation and Contrast Effects,”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 323–40.
14.
JaccardJames, WanChoi K., and TurrisiRobert (1990), “The Detection and Interpretation of Interaction Effects Between Continuous Variables in Multiple Regression,”Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25 (4), 467–78.
15.
KellerKevin Lane (1987), “Memory Factors in Advertising: The Effect of Advertising Retrieval Cues on Brand Evaluations,”Journal of Consumer Research, 14 (December), 316–33.
16.
KrosnickJon A., and AlwinDwayne F. (1987), “An Evaluation of a Cognitive Theory of Response-Order Effects in Survey Measurement,”Public Opinion Quarterly, 51 (2), 201–19.
17.
LynchJohn G.Jr., ChakravartiDipankar, and MitraAnusree (1991), “Contrast Effects in Consumer Judgments: Changes in Mental Representations or in the Anchoring of Rating Scales?”Journal of Consumer Research, 18 (December), 284–97.
18.
LynchJohn G.Jr., MarmorsteinHoward, and WeigoldMichael F. (1988), “Choice From Sets Including Remembered Brands: Use of Recalled Attributes and Prior Overall Evaluations,”Journal of Consumer Research, 15 (September), 169–84.
19.
MartinLeonard L., SetaJohn J., and CreliaRick (1990), “Assimilation and Contrast as a Function of People's Willingness and Ability to Expend Effort in Forming an Impression,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59 (1), 27–37.
20.
MorwitzVicki G., JohnsonEric, and SchmittleinDavid (forthcoming), “Does Measuring Intent Change Behavior?”Journal of Consumer Research.
21.
MoorthySridhar K. (1991), “Measuring Overall Judgments and Attribute Evaluations: Overall First vs. Attributes First,” Technical Working Paper Report No. 91–120 (August). Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.
22.
OttatiVictor, RiggleEllen, WyerRobert S.Jr., SchwarzNorbert, and KuklinskiJames (1989), “The Cognitive and Affective Bases of Opinion Survey Responses,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57 (3), 404–15.
23.
PechmannCornelia, and RatneshwarS. (1992), “Consumer Covariation Judgments: Theory or Data Driven?”Journal of Consumer Research, 19 (December).
24.
SchumanHoward, and PresserStanley (1981), Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys: Experiments on Question Form, Wording, and Content.New York: Academic Press, Inc.
25.
SchwarzNorbert, and BlessHerbert (1991), “Constructing Reality and Its Alternatives: An Inclusion/Exclusion Model of Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Social Judgment,” in The Construction of Social Judgment, MartinL., and TesserA., eds. Hillsdale. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
26.
SchwarzNorbert, StrackFritz, HippierHans-J., and BishopGeorge (1991), “Psychological Sources of Response Effects in Surveys: The Impact of Administration Mode,” in Special Issue: Cognitive Aspects of Survey Methodology, JobeJ., and LoftusE., eds., Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5 (May-June), 193–212.
27.
SchwarzNorbert, StrackFritz, and MaiHans-Peter (1991), “Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Part-Whole Question Sequences: A Conversational Logic Analysis,”Public Opinion Quarterly, 55 (Spring), 3–23.
28.
SimmonsCarolyn J., BickartBarbara A., and LynchJohn G.Jr. (1992), “Capturing and Creating Public Opinion in Survey Research,” working paper, University of Illinois.
29.
SkowronskiJohn J., and CarlstonDonal E. (1989), “Negativity and Extremity Biases in Impression Formation: A Review of Explanations,”Psychological Bulletin, 105 (1), 131–42.
30.
TourangeauRoger, and RasinskiKenneth A. (1988), “Cognitive Processes Underlying Context Effects in Attitude Measurement,”Psychological Bulletin, 103 (3), 299–314.
31.
TourangeauRoger, RasinskiKenneth A., BradbumNorman M., and D'AndradeRoy (1989), “Carryover Effects in Attitude Surveys,”Public Opinion Quarterly, 53 (Winter), 495–524.
32.
WilsonTimothy D., KraftDolores, and DunnDana S. (1989), “The Disruptive Effects of Explaining Attitudes: The Moderating Effect of Knowledge About the Attitude Object,”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25 (5), 379–400.
33.
WrightPeter, and KriewallMary Ann (1980), “State-of-Mind Effects on the Accuracy With Which Utility Functions Predict Marketplace Choice,”Journal of Marketing Research, 17 (August), 277–93.
34.
ZeithamlValarie, ParasuramanA., and BerryLeonard L. (1990), Delivering Quality Service.New York: The Free Press.
