A conceptual framework is presented that resolves some of the conflicts and inconsistencies in the various paradigms pertaining to goal setting. Hypotheses about the impact of quota level, expectancy, and self-efficacy on motivation are developed and tested in a laboratory experiment in which the subjects assume the role of salespersons and negotiate with opponents whose roles are simulated by a custom-designed computer program. The results indicate that as quota level is increased, effort increases only up to a point, after which increases in the level of the quota may actually decrease effort. Additionally, the impact of increased quota levels is stronger for subjects who are high in self-efficacy than for subjects who are low in self-efficacy. Finally, information about the level of task difficulty also influences the motivation to expend effort at the task.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonRalph E., HairJoseph F., and BushAlan J. (1988), Professional Sales Management.New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
2.
AtkinsonJohn W. (1958), “Toward an Experimental Analysis of Human Motivation in Terms of Motives, Expectancies, and Incentives,” in Motives in Fantasy, Action and Society, AtkinsonJ. W., ed. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand,288–305.
3.
BanduraAlbert (1977), Social Learning Theory.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
4.
BanduraAlbert (1982a), “Self-Efficacy Mechanism in Human Agency,”American Psychologist, 37 (2), 122–47.
5.
BanduraAlbert (1982b), “The Self and Mechanisms of Agency,” in Psychological Perspectives on the Self, Vol. 1, SulsJ., ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,3–39.
6.
BanduraAlbert (1984), “Recycling Misconceptions of Perceived Self-Efficacy,”Cognitive Therapy and Research, 8 (3), 231–55.
7.
BanduraAlbert, AdamsNancy E., and BeyerJanice (1977), “Cognitive Processes Mediating Behavioral Change,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35 (3), 125–39.
8.
BanduraAlbert, and WoodRobert (1989), “Effect of Perceived Controllability and Performance Standards on Self-Regulation of Complex Decision Making,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56 (3), 407–15.
9.
CloptonStephen W. (1984), “Seller and Buying Firm Factors Affecting Industrial Buyers’ Negotiation Behavior and Outcomes,”Journal of Marketing Research, 21 (February), 39–53.
10.
DachlerPeter H., and MobleyWilliam M. (1973), “Construct Validation of an Instrumentality-Expectancy-Task-Goal Model of Work Motivation: Some Theoretical Boundary Conditions,”Journal of Applied Psychology Monograph, 58 (3), 397–418.
11.
ErezMiriam, and ZidonIsaac (1984), “Effect of Goal Acceptance on the Relationship of Goal Difficulty to Performance,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 69 (1), 69–78.
12.
FeldmanJeffrey M., and LynchJohn G.Jr. (1988), “Self Generated Validity and Other Effects of Measurement on Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 73 (August), 421–35.
13.
GarlandHoward (1984), “Relation of Effort-Performance Expectancy to Performance in Goal-Setting Experiments,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 69 (1), 79–84.
14.
GistMarilyn E. (1987), “Self-Efficacy: Implications for Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,”Academy of Management Review, 12 (3), 472–85.
15.
JanzTom (1982), “Manipulating Subjective Expectancy Through Feedback: A Laboratory Study of the Expectancy-Performance Relationship,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 67 (4), 480–5.
16.
JohnstonWilliam J., and BonomaThomas V. (1983), “The Effect of Power Differences on the Outcome of Consumer Bargaining Situations,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 11, KinnearT., ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research,170–4.
17.
LathamGary P., and LockeEdwin A. (1979), “Goal-Setting: A Motivational Technique That Works,”Organizational Dynamics, 8 (2), 68–80.
18.
LockeEdwin A. (1966), “The Relation of Intention to Level of Performance,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 69 (2), 241–51.
19.
LockeEdwin A. (1968), “Toward a Theory of Task Motivation and Incentives,”Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 3, 157–89.
20.
LockeEdwin A. (1978), “The Ubiquity of the Technique of Goal Setting in Theories of and Approaches to Employee Motivation,”Academy of Management Review, 3, 594–601.
21.
LockeEdwin A., and LathamGary P. (1984), Goal Setting: A Motivational Technology That Works!Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
22.
LockeEdwin A., ShawKaryll N., SaariLise M., and LathamGary P. (1981), “Goal Setting and Task Performance: 1969–1980,”Psychological Bulletin, 90 (1), 125–52.
23.
MatsuiTomao, OkadaAkinori, and MizuguchiReiji (1981), “Expectancy Theory Prediction of the Goal Theory Postulate, ‘The Harder the Goals, the Higher the Performance’,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 66 (1), 54–8.
24.
MentoAnthony J., CartledgeNorman D., and LockeEdwin A. (1980), “Maryland vs. Michigan vs. Minnesota: Another Look at the Relationship of Expectancy and Goal Difficulty to Task Performance,”Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 25, 419–40.
25.
MitchellTerrence R. (1979), “Organizational Behavior,”Annual Review of Psychology, 30, 243–81.
26.
MotowidloStephan J., LoehrVirginia, and DunnetteMarvin D. (1978), “A Laboratory Study of the Effects of Goal Specificity on the Relationship Between Probability of Success and Performance,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 63 (2), 172–9.
27.
NaylorJames C., and IlgenDaniel R. (1984), “Goal Setting: A Theoretical Analysis of a Motivational Technology,” in Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 6, StawB., and CummingsL. L., eds. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, Inc.,95–140.
28.
PaulhusDelroy (1983), “Sphere-Specific Measures of Perceived Control,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44 (6), 1253–65.
29.
PenningtonAllan L. (1968), “Customer-Salesman Bargaining in Retail Transactions,”Journal of Marketing Research, 5 (August), 255–62.
30.
RosenbergMorris (1965), Society and the Adolescent Self-Image.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
31.
SchurrPaul H., and OzanneJulie L. (1985), “Influences on Exchange Processes: Buyers’ Preconceptions of a Seller's Trustworthiness and Bargaining Toughness,”Journal of Consumer Research, 11 (March), 939–53.
32.
SheridanJohn E., SlocumJohn W., and MinByung (1975), “Motivational Determinants of Job Performance,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 60 (1), 119–21.
33.
TubbsMark E. (1986), “Goal Setting: A Meta-Analytic Examination of the Empirical Evidence,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 71 (3), 474–83.
34.
VroomVictor H. (1964), Work and Motivation.New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
35.
WalkerOrville C.Jr., ChurchillGilbert A.Jr., and FordNeil M. (1977), “Motivation and Performance in Industrial Selling: Recent Knowledge and Needed Research,”Journal of Marketing Research, 14 (May), 156–8.
36.
WeitzBarton A., SujanHarish, and SujanMita (1986), “Knowledge, Motivation, and Behavior: A Framework for Improving Selling Effectiveness,”Journal of Marketing, 50 (October), 174–91.
37.
WoodRobert, and BanduraAlbert (1989), “Impact of Conceptions of Ability on Self-Regulatory Mechanisms and Complex Decision Milking,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56 (3), 407–15.
