Estimating the likelihood of future events is a critical aspect of making a variety of marketing management decisions. Prior research has shown very robust patterns in the probability assessments of individuals, the predominant finding being that individuals are overconfident. The author theoretically investigates why overconfidence occurs by drawing on prior work on how cognitions are used in decisions. Specifically, the effects of evaluative feedback, counterfactual reasoning, and expertise are explored in two experiments in the context of making strategic marketing predictions. The findings provide some novel insights on overconfidence and accuracy of predictions. They suggest that (1) “humbling” feedback increases accuracy and lowers overconfidence, (2) overconfidence from being “blind sided” can be reduced by counterfactual reasoning, and (3) “richness” of experts’ mental representations results in higher overconfidence. The author concludes with a discussion of these findings and managerial implications.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdelsonBeth (1984); “When Novices Surpass Experts: The Difficulty of a Task May Increase With Expertise,”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 10(3), 483–95.
2.
AlloyLauren B., and AhrensAnthony H. (1987), “Depression and Pessimism for the Future: Biased Use of Statistically Relevant Information in Predictions for Self and Others,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(2), 366–78.
3.
ArkesHal R., and ChristensenCaryn, LaiCheryl, and BlumerCatherine (1987), “Two Methods of Reducing Overconfidence,”Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 39(1), 133–44.
4.
ArkesHal R., and HammondK. R. (1986), Judgments and Decision Making: An Interdisciplinary Reader.New York: Cambridge University Press.
5.
BanduraA. (1986), Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
6.
BanduraA., and CervoneD. (1986), “Differential Engagement of Self-Reflective Influences in Cognitive Motivation,”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 38, 92–113.
7.
CamererColin F. (1987), “Do Biases in Probability Judgment Matter in Markets? Experimental Evidence,”American Economic Review, 11(December), 981–97.
8.
ChakravartiDipankar, and MitchellAndrew, and StaelinRichard (1981), “Judgment Based Marketing Decision Models: Problems and Possible Solutions,”Journal of Marketing, 45(Fall), 13–23.
9.
ChaseW. G., and SimonH. A. (1973), “Perceptions in Chess,”Cognitive Psychology, 4(1), 55–81.
10.
ChiMichelene T. H., FeltovichPaul J., and GlaserRobert (1981), “Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices,”Cognitive Science, 5(2), 121–52.
11.
CravensDavid W. (1987), Strategic Marketing.Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.
12.
DunningDavid, GriffinDale W., MilojkovicJames D., and RossLee (1990), “The Overconfidence Effect in Social Prediction,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(4), 568–81.
13.
FeldmanJack M., and LynchJohn G. (1988), “Self-Generated Validity and Other Effects of Measurement on Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 13(August), 421–35.
14.
FischhoffBaruch (1982), “Debiasing,” in Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, KahnemanD., and SlovicP., and TverskyA., eds. New York: Cambridge University Press.
15.
FischhoffBaruch, and SlovicPaul (1980), “A Little Learning … Confidence in Multi-Cue Judgment,” in Attention and Performance, Vol. 8, NickersonR., ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16.
FischhoffBaruch, and SlovicPaul, and LichtensteinSarah (1977), “Knowing With Uncertainty: The Appropriateness of Extreme Confidence,”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3(4), 552–64.
17.
GriffinDale W., and DunningDavid, and RossLee (1990), “The Role of Construal Processes in Overconfident Predictions About the Self and Others,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(December), 1128–39.
18.
HochStephen J. (1985), “Counterfactual Reasoning and Accuracy in Predicting Personal Events,”Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11(4), 719–31.
19.
HogarthRobin M., and MakridakisSpyros (1981), “Forecasting and Planning: An Appraisal,”Management Science, 27(2), 115–38.
20.
KahnemanDaniel, and SlovicPaul, and TverskyAmos (1982), Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.New York: Cambridge University Press.
21.
KoriatAsher, and LichtensteinSarah, and FischhoffBaruch (1980), “Reasons for Confidence,”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6(2), 107–18.
22.
LehmannDonald R., and WinerRussell S. (1991), Analysis for Marketing Planning.Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.
23.
LichtensteinSarah, and FischhoffBaruch (1977), “Do Those Who Know More Also Know More About How Much They Know? The Calibration of Probability Judgments,”Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 20(2), 159–83.
24.
LichtensteinSarah, and FischhoffBaruch (1980), “Training for Calibration,”Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 26(2), 149–71.
25.
LichtensteinSarah, and FischhoffBaruch, and PhillipsLawrence D. (1982), “Calibration of Probabilities: The State of the Art to 1980,” in Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, KahnemanDaniel, and SlovicPaul, and TverskyAmos, eds. New York: Cambridge University Press.
26.
LockeEdwin A., and FrederickElizabeth, LeeCynthia, and BobkoPhilip (1984), “Effect of Self-Efficacy, Goals, and Task Strategies on Task Performance,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(2), 241–51.
27.
LynchJohn G.Jr., and MarmorsteinHoward, and WeigoldMichael F. (1988), “Choices From Sets Including Remembered Brands: Use of Recalled Attributes and Prior Overall Evaluations,”Journal of Consumer Research, 15(September), 169–84.
28.
MurphyA. H., and WinklerP. (1977), “Can Weather Forecasters Formulate Reliable Probability Forecasts of Precipitation and Temperature?”National Weather Digest, 2, 2–9.
29.
MurphyGregory L., and WrightJack C. (1984), “Changes in Conceptual Structure With Expertise: Differences Between Real-World Experts and Novices,”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 10(1), 144–55.
30.
NisbettRichard, and RossLee (1980), Human Inferences: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgments.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
31.
PhillipsLawrence D., and WrightG. N. (1977), “Cultural Differences in Viewing Uncertainty and Assessing Probabilities,” in Decision Making and Change in Human Affairs, JungermannHermut, and deZeeuwGerard, eds. Amsterdam: D. Reidel.
32.
PodsakoffPhilip M., and FarhJiing-Lih (1989), “Effects of Feedback Sign and Credibility on Goal Setting and Task Performance,”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 44(1), 45–67.
33.
ReganJudith W., and GosselinkHolly, HubschJanet, and UlshElizabeth (1975), “Do People Have Inflated Views of Their Own Ability?”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31(2), 295–301.
34.
ShakleeH., and FischhoffBaruch (1982), “Strategies of Information Search in Causal Analysis,”Memory and Cognition, 10(6), 520–30.
35.
SharpGlen L., CutlerBrian L., and PenrodSteven D. (1988), “Performance Feedback Improves the Resolution of Confidence Judgments,”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 42(3), 271–83.
36.
Stael von HolsteinC. A. S. (1972), “Probabilistic Forecasting: An Experiment Related to the Stock Market,”Organizational Behavior and Human Processes, 8(1), 139–58.
37.
TropeYaacov (1978), “Inferences of Personal Characteristics on the Basis of Information Retrieved From One's Memory,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(2), 93–106.
38.
ValloneRobert P., GriffinDale W., and LinSabrian, and RossLee (1990), “Overconfident Predictions of Future Actions and Outcomes by Self and Others,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(4), 582–92.
39.
WallstenThomas S., and BudescuDavid V. (1983), “Encoding Subjective Probabilities: A Psychological and Psychometric Review,”Management Science, 29(February), 151–73.
40.
WongPaul T. P., and WeinerBernard (1980), “When People Ask ‘Why’ Questions, and the Heuristics of Attributional Search,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(4), 650–63.
41.
YatesJ. Frank, McDanielLinda S., and BrownEric S. (1991), “Probabilistic Forecasts of Stock Prices and Earnings: The Hazards of Nascent Expertise,”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 49(1), 60–79.
42.
YatesJ. Frank, and ZhuYing, RonisDavid L., WangDeng-Feng, ShinotsukaHiromi, and TodaMasanao (1989), “Probability Judgment Accuracy: China, Japan, and the United States,”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43(2), 145–71.
