Commitment in channel relationships is modeled as a function of (1) each party's perception of the other party's commitment, (2) self-reported and perceived pledges (idiosyncratic investments and contractual terms) made by each party, and (3) other factors such as communication level, reputation, and relationship history. A dyadic model represented by a simultaneous equation system is estimated with data from 378 pairs of manufacturers and industrial distributors. The results indicate that one type of pledge, idiosyncratic investments, has a strong effect on the commitment of both parties to the relationship. In addition, each party's commitment is affected by the perceived commitment of the other party. Finally, idiosyncratic investments signal commitment, affecting each party's perceptions of the other party's commitment.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AchrolRavi S., ScheerLisa K., and SternLouis W. (1990), “Designing Successful Transorganizational Marketing Alliances,”Marketing Science Institute Working Paper 90–118.
2.
AndersonErin, and WeitzBarton (1986), “Make-or-Buy Decisions: Vertical Integration and Marketing Productivity,”Sloan Management Review, 27(Spring), 3–19.
3.
AndersonErin, and WeitzBarton (1989), “Determinants of Continuity in Conventional Industrial Channel Dyads,”Marketing Science, 8(Fall), 310–23.
4.
AndersonJames C., and NarusJames A. (1984), “A Model of the Distributor's Perspective of Distributor-Manufacturer Working Relationships,”Journal of Marketing, 48(January), 62–74.
5.
AndersonJames C., and NarusJames A. (1990), “A Model of Distributor Firm and Manufacturer Firm Working Partnerships,”Journal of Marketing, 54(January), 42–58.
6.
AxelrodRobert (1984), The Evolution of Cooperation.New York: Basic Books, Inc.
7.
BacharachSamuel B., and LawlerEdward J. (1981), Bargaining: Power, Tactics, and Outcomes.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc., Publishers.
8.
BeckerH. S. (1960), “Notes on the Concept of Commitment,”American Journal of Sociology, 66(3), 32–40.
9.
BucklinLouis P. (1973), “A Theory of Channel Control,”Journal of Marketing, 37(January), 39–47.
10.
Business Week (1986), “And Now, the Post-Industrial Corporation,”65 (March 3), 64–71.
11.
CampbellDonald T. (1955), “The Informant in Quantitative Research,”American Journal of Sociology, 60(3), 339–42.
12.
DwyerR. Robert, SchurrPaul H., and OhSejo (1987), “Developing Buyer-Seller Relations,”Journal of Markerting, 51(April), 11–28.
13.
EisenbergerSteven, and HuntingtonRobin, HutchisonSteven, and SowaDeborah (1986), “Perceived Organizational Support,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500–7.
14.
El-AnsaryAdel I., and SternLouis W. (1972), “Power Measurement in the Distribution Channel,”Journal of Marketing Research, 9(February), 47–52.
15.
EliashbergJehoshua, and MichieDonald A. (1984), “Multiple Business Goals Sets as Determinants of Marketing Channel Conflict: An Empirical Study,”Journal of Marketing Research, 21(February), 75–88.
16.
GaskiJohn F. (1984), “The Theory of Power and Conflict in Channels of Distribution,”Journal of Marketing, 48(Summer), 9–29.
17.
GouldnerAlvin (1960), “The Norm of Reciprocity: A Preliminary Statement,”American Sociological Review, 25(April), 161–78.
18.
JohnGeorge, and ReveTorger (1982), “The Reliability and Validity of Key Informant Data from Dyadic Relationships in Marketing Channels,”Journal of Marketing Research, 19(November), 517–24.
19.
KelleyHarold H. (1983), “Love and Commitment,” in Close Relationships, KelleyH. H., and BercheidE., and ChristenseA., and HarveyJ. H., and HustonT. L., and LevingerG., and McClintockE., and PeplauL. A., and PetersonD. R., eds. New York: W. H. Freeman,265–314.
20.
KleinBenjamin, and LefflerKeith B. (1981), “The Role of Market Contracts in Assuring Contractual Performance,”Journal of Political Economy, 89(4), 615–41.
21.
MacauleyStewart (1963), “Non-Contractual Relations in Business,”American Sociological Review, 18(3), 55–70.
22.
MacneilIan R. (1980), The New Social Contract: An Inquiry Into Modern Contractual Relations.New York, CT: Yale University Press.
23.
MohrJakki, and NevinJohn R. (1990), “Communication Strategies in Marketing Channels: A Theoretical Perspective,”Journal of Marketing, 54(October), 36–51.
24.
NunnallyJum C. (1978), Psychometric Theory, 2nd ed.New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
25.
O'ReillyCharles, and ChatmanJennifer (1986), “Organizational Commitment and Psychological Attachment: The Effects of Compliance, Identification, and Internatalization on Prosocial Behavior,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 492–9.
26.
OuchiWilliam G. (1980), “Markets, Bureaucracies, and Clans,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 25(September), 129–41.
27.
PowellWalter W. (1987), “Hybrid Organizational Arrangements: New Form or Transitional Development?”California Management Review, 30(1), 67–87.
28.
PruittDean G. (1981), Negotiation Behavior.New York: Academic Press, Inc.
29.
RosenbergLarry J., and SternLouis W. (1972), “Conflict Measurement in the Distribution Channel,”Journal of Marketing Research, 8(November), 437–42.
30.
SchellingThomas C. (1960), The Strategy of Conflict.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31.
SpekmanRobert E., and SawhneyKirti (1990), “Toward a Conceptual Understanding of Strategic Alliances,”Marketing Science Institute Working Paper 90–114.
32.
SternLouis W., and El-AnsaryAdel (1990), Marketing Channels, 3rd ed.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
33.
TelserLester G. (1980), “A Theory of Self-Enforcing Contracts,”Journal of Business, 53(January), 27–44.
34.
WilliamsonOliver E. (1983), “Credible Commitment: Using Hostages to Support Exchange,”American Economic Review, 73(September), 519–40.
35.
WilliamsonOliver E. (1985), The Economic Institutions of Capitalism.New York: The Free Press.
