The author presents a rejoinder to the article by Green, Krieger, and Agarwal.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AgarwalManoj K., and GreenPaul E. (1989), “Adaptive Conjoint Analysis Versus Self-Explicated Models: Some Empirical Results,” working paper, State University of New York at Binghamton (December).
2.
FinkbeinerCarl (1988), “Comparison of Conjoint Choice Simulators,”Proceedings of the Sawtooth Conference on Perceptual Mapping, Conjoint Analysis, and Computer Interviewing.Ketchum, ID: Sawtooth Software, Inc.
3.
FinkbeinerCarl, and PlatzPatricia J. (1986), “Computerized Versus Paper and Pencil Methods: A Comparison Study,” paper presented at Association for Consumer Research Conference, Toronto (October).
4.
GreenPaul E., KriegerAbba M., and AgarwalManoj K. (1991), “Adaptive Conjoint Analysis: Some Caveats and Suggestions,”Journal of Marketing Research, 28(May),
5.
JohnsonRichard M. (1989), “Assessing the Validity of Conjoint Analysis,”Proceedings of the Sawtooth Conference on Perceptual Mapping, Conjoint Analysis, and Computer Interviewing.Ketchum, ID: Sawtooth Software, Inc.
