Data from two experiments suggest that the genders differ in how they make judgments. In comparison with men, women appeared to have a lower threshold for elaborating on message cues and thus made greater use of such cues in judging products. These differences were eliminated both when the message cues prompted so little attention that they were below men's and women's thresholds for message elaboration and when they prompted so much attention that both genders’ thresholds were exceeded. The origins and implications of these differences are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BakanDavid (1966), The Duality of Human Existence: An Essay on Psychology and Religion.Chicago: Rand McNally Publishing Company.
2.
BolingerDwight, and SearsDonald A. (1981), Aspects of Language.New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.
3.
CarlstonDonald E. (1980), “Events, Inferences, and Impression Formation,” in Person Memory: The Cognitive Bases of Social Perception, HastieReid, eds. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 89–120.
4.
DePauloBella M., and RosenthalRobert (1979), “Sex Differences in Accommodation in Nonverbal Communication,” in Skill in Nonverbal Communication, RosenthalR., ed. Cambridge, MA: Oelgeschlager, Gunn and Hain.
5.
FiskeSusan T., and TaylorShelley E. (1984), Social Cognition.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
6.
FrankelMarc T., and RollinsHoward A.Jr. (1983), “Does Mother Know Best? Mothers and Fathers Interacting With Preschool Sons and Daughters,”Developmental Psychology, 19(September), 694–702.
7.
GleasonJean Berko, and GreifEsther Blank (1983), “Men's Speech to Young Children,” in Language, Gender, and Society, ThorneBarrie, and KramaraeCheris, and HenleyNancy, eds. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 140–50.
8.
GreenwaldAnthony G. (1968), “Cognitive Learning, Cognitive Response to Persuasion and Attitude Change,” in Psychological Foundations of Attitudes, GreenwaldAnthony G., BrockTimothy C., and OstromThomas M., eds. New York: Academic Press, Inc., 147–70.
9.
HallJudith A. (1984), Nonverbal Sex Differences: Communication Accuracy and Expressive Style.Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
10.
HastieReid (1980), “Memory for Behavioral Information That Confirms or Contradicts a Personality Impression,” in Person Memory: The Cognitive Basis of Social Perception, HastieReid, eds. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 155–77.
11.
HolbrookMorris (1986), “Aims, Concepts, and Methods for the Representation of Individual Differences in Esthetics Responses to Design Features,”Journal of Consumer Research, 13(December), 337–47.
12.
HoustonMichael J., ChildersTerry L., and HecklerSusan E. (1987), “Picture-Word Consistency and the Elaborative Processing of Advertisements,”Journal of Marketing Research, 24(November), 359–69.
13.
KrugmanHerbert E. (1966), “The Measurement of Advertising Involvement,”Public Opinion Quarterly, 30(Winter), 583–96.
14.
LenneyEllen, and GoldJoel, and BrowningChris (1983), “Sex Differences in Self-Confidence: The Influence of Comparison to Others’ Ability Level,”Sex Roles, 9(September), 925–42.
15.
LichtensteinMeryl, and SrullThomas K. (1987), “Processing Objectives as a Determinant of the Relationship Between Recall and Judgment,”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23(March), 93–118.
16.
MandlerGeorge (1980), “Recognizing: The Judgment of Previous Occurrence,”Psychological Review, 87(May), 252–71.
17.
MandlerGeorge (1982), “The Structure of Value: Accounting for Taste,” in Affect and Cognition: The 17th Annual Carnegie Symposium, ClarkMargaret S., and FiskeSusan T., eds. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 3–36.
18.
McGuinnessDiane, and PribramKarl H. (1979), “The Origins of Sensory Bias in the Development of Gender Differences in Perception and Cognition,” in Cognitive Growth and Development, BortnerMorton, ed. New York: Bruner/Mazel Publishers, 3–56.
19.
Meyers-LevyJoan (1988a), “Factors Affecting the Use of Conceptually Driven and Data Driven Processing,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 25, HoustonMichael J., ed. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 169–73.
20.
Meyers-LevyJoan (1988b), “The Influence of Sex Roles on Judgment,”Journal of Consumer Research, 14(March), 522–30.
21.
Meyers-LevyJoan, and TyboutAlice M. (1989), “Schema Congruity as a Basis for Product Evaluation,”Journal of Consumer Research, 16(June), 39–54.
22.
NowaczykRonald (1982), “Sex-Related Differences in the Color Lexicon,”Language and Speech, 25(July-September), 257–65.
23.
OstromThomas M., LingleJohn H., Pry orJohn B., and GevaNehemia (1980), “Cognitive Organization of Social Impressions,” in Person Memory: The Cognitive Basis of Social Perception, HastieReid, eds. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 55–88.
24.
PainterJ. J., and GranzinK. L. (1976), “Profiling the Male Fashion Innovator—Another Step,”Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 3, AndersonBeverlee, ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, 40–5.
25.
PettyRichard E., and CacioppoJohn T. (1981), Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches.Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown Company.
26.
SeamonJohn G., and BrodyNathan, and KauffD. M. (1983), “Affective Discrimination of Stimuli That Are Not Recognized: Effects of Shadowing, Masking, and Cerebral Laterality,”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 9(July), 544–55.
27.
SistrunkFrank, and McDavidJohn W. (1971), “Sex Variable in Conforming Behavior,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 17(February), 200–7.
28.
SmithDorothy E. (1980), “A Sociology for Women,” in The Prism of Sex, ShermanJulia, and BeckEvelyn, eds. Madison: University of Wisconsin.
29.
SrullThomas K. (1981), “Person Memory: Some Tests of Associative Storage and Retrieval Models,”Journal of Experimental Psychology, 110(December), 440–63.
30.
TverskyAmos (1977), “Features of Similarity,”Psychological Review, 84(July), 327–52.
31.
WoodMarion M. (1966), “The Influence of Sex and Knowledge of Communication Effectiveness of Spontaneous Speech,”Word, 22(April-August-December), 112–37.
32.
WrightPeter (1979), “Concrete Action Plans in TV Messages to Increase Reading of Drug Warnings,”Journal of Consumer Research, 6(December), 256–69.
33.
WrightPeter (1981), “Cognitive Responses to Mass Media Advocacy,” in Cognitive Responses in Persuasion, PettyRichard E., OstromThomas M., and BrockTimothy, eds. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 263–82.
34.
WrightPeter, and KriewallMary Ann (1980), “State-of-Mind Effects on the Accuracy With Which Utility Functions Predict Marketplace Choice,”Journal of Marketing Research, 17(August), 277–93.
