An experiment was conducted to examine the effect of self-interest in a personal communication situation. Self-interest was investigated as a moderator of the effects of argument strength and expertise on personal communication effectiveness. The results suggest that self-interest is an important contingency variable that can alter significantly the effectiveness of personal communication variables.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Automotive News (1986), “The Truth About Youth” (March 10), E-30.
2.
BettmanJames R. (1979), An Information Processing Theory of Consumer Choice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
3.
BochnerStephen and ChesterA. Insko (1966), “Communication Discrepancy, Source Credibility, and Opinion Change,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4 (6), 614–21.
4.
BockGordon, ThanePeterson, and MarkMaremont (1986), “How IBM Is Fighting Back,” Business Week (November 17), 152–7.
5.
CohenJacob (1977), Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: Academic Press, Inc.
6.
DwyerRobert F., PaulH. Schurr, and SejoOh (1987), “Developing Buyer-Seller Relationships,” Journal of Marketing, 51 (April), 11–27.
7.
FiedlerFred E. and MartinM. Chemers (1974), Leadership and Effective Management. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company.
8.
HansenRobert A. and CarolA. Scott (1976), “Comments on ‘Attribution Theory and Advertiser Credibility’,” Journal of Marketing Research, 13 (May), 193–7.
9.
HarmonRobert R. and KennethA. Coney (1982), “The Persuasive Effects of Source Credibility in Buy and Lease Situations,” Journal of Marketing Research, 19 (May), 255–60.
10.
HoustonFranklin S. and JuleB. Gassenheimer (1987), “Marketing and Exchange,” Journal of Marketing, 51 (October), 3–18.
11.
LevittTheodore (1984), The Marketing Imagination. New York: The Free Press.
12.
MillimanRonald E. and DouglasL. Fugate (1988), “Using Trust-Transference as a Persuasion Technique: An Empirical Investigation,” Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 8 (August), 1–8.
13.
PetersonRobert A., AlbaumGerald, and BeltraminiRichard F. (1985), “A Meta-Analysis of Effect Sizes in Consumer Behavior Experiments,” Journal of Consumer Research, 12 (June), 97–103.
14.
PettyRichard E. and JohnT. Cacioppo (1981), Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches. Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown Company Publishers.
15.
PettyRichard E., JohnT. Cacioppo, and DavidSchumann (1983), “Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Involvement,” Journal of Consumer Research, 10 (September), 135–46.
16.
SmithMichael F. and JamesM. Hunt (1987), “Disconfirmation of Expectations: A Method for Enhancing the Effectiveness of Customer Communications,” Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 1 (May), 9–19.
17.
SternthalBrian, LynnW. Phillips, and RubyDholakia (1978), “The Persuasion Effect of Source Credibility: A Situational Analysis,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 42 (Fall), 285–314.
18.
SujanMita, JamesR. Bettman, and HarishSujan (1986), “Effects of Consumer Expectations on Information Processing in Selling Encounters,” Journal of Marketing Research, 23 (November), 346–53.
19.
WeitzBarton A. (1981), “Effectiveness in Sales Interactions: A Contingency Framework,” Journal of Marketing, 45 (Winter), 85–103.
20.
WrightPeter L. (1986), “Schemer Schema: Consumers’ Intuitive Theories About Marketers’ Influence Tactics,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 13, RichardJ. Lutz, ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, 1–3.
21.
ZeithamlValarie A., LeonardL. Berry, and ParasuramanA. (1988), “Communication and Control Processes in the Delivery of Service Quality,” Journal of Marketing, 52 (April), 35–48.
