Results from three experiments indicate how age, cognitive style, and perceptual aid affect consumers’ use of nutritional information. In experiments 1 and 2, age and perceptual aid influence accuracy in a cereal choice task. In experiment 3, perceptual aid interacts with cognitive style, influencing accuracy and decision time. The authors discuss implications for aging theory, consumer education, and public policy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarrettGerald, RobertAlexander, and BryanForbes (1977), “Analysis of Performance Measurement and Training Requirements for Decision Making in Emergency Situations,” JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 7, 126 (ms. no. 1623).
2.
BeardenWilliam O. and MasonJ. Barry (1979), “Elderly Use of In-Store Information Sources and Dimensions of Product Satisfaction/Dissatisfaction,” Journal of Retailing, 55 (Spring), 79–81.
3.
BeckJacob (1972), “Similarity Grouping and Peripheral Discriminability Under Uncertainty,” American Journal of Psychology, 85 (March), 1–20.
4.
BettmanJames, JohnPayne, and RichardStaelin (1985), “Cognitive Considerations in Designing Effective Labels for Presenting Risk Information,” Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 5, 1–28.
5.
BrucksMerrie, AndrewMitchell, and RichardStaelin (1984), “The Effect of Nutritional Information Disclosure in Advertising: An Information Processing Approach,” Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 3, 1–25.
6.
CalcichStephen and EdwardBlair (1983), “The Perceptual Task in Acquisition of Package Information,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 10, RichardP. Bagozzi and AliceM. Tybout, eds. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, 221–5.
7.
CaponNoel and RogerDavis (1984), “Basic Cognitive Ability Measures as Predictors of Consumer Information Processing Strategies,” Journal of Consumer Research, 11 (June), 551–63.
8.
ColeCatherine A. and MichaelJ. Houston (1987), “Encoding and Media Effects on Consumer Learning Deficiencies in the Elderly,” Journal of Marketing Research, 14 (February), 55–63.
9.
Consumer Reports (1986), “How Good is Your Breakfast?” 51 (October), 628–37.
10.
EisnerDonald (1972), “Developmental Relationships Between Field Independence and Fixity-Mobility,” Perceptual and Motor Skills, 34 (June), 767–70.
11.
FarkasMitchell S. and WilliamJ. Hoyer (1980), “Processing Consequences of Perceptual Grouping in Selective Attention,” Journal of Gerontology, 35 (March), 207–16.
12.
GaethGary J. and TimothyB. Heath (1987), “The Cognitive Processing of Misleading Advertising in Young and Old Adults: Assessment and Training,” Journal of Consumer Research, 14 (June), 43–54.
13.
GaethGary J. and JamesShanteau (1984), “Reducing the Influence of Irrelevant Information on Experienced Decision Makers,” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 33 (April), 263–82.
14.
GillyMary and ValarieZeithaml (1985), “The Elderly Consumer and Adoption of Technologies,” Journal of Consumer Research, 12 (December), 353–7.
15.
GoodenoughDonald (1986), “History of the Field Dependence Construct,” in Field Dependence in Psychological Theory, Research and Application, BertiniMario, PizzamiglioLuigi, and WapnerSeymour, eds. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 5–13.
16.
HaranoRichard (1970), “Relationships of Field Dependence and Motor Vehicle Accident Involvement,” Perceptual and Motor Skills, 31 (August), 272–4.
17.
HoyerWilliam, GeorgeRebok, and SusanSved (1979), “Effects of Varying Irrelevant Information on Adult Age Differences in Problem Solving,” Journal of Gerontology, 34 (July), 553–60.
18.
JohnDeborah Roedder and CatherineA. Cole (1986), “Age Differences in Information Processing: Understanding Deficits in Young and Elderly Consumers,” Journal of Consumer Research, 13 (December), 297–315.
19.
KauslerDonald (1982), Experimental Psychology and Human Aging. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
20.
KauslerDonald and DavidM. Kleim (1978), “Age Differences in Processing Relevant Versus Irrelevant Stimuli in Multiple Item Recognition Learning,” Journal of Gerontology, 33 (January), 87–93.
21.
Labouvie-ViefGisella (1980), “Beyond Formal Operations: Uses and Limits of Pure Logic in Life-Span Development,” Human Development, 23 (May-June), 141–61.
22.
McKennaFrank, JohnDuncan, and IvanBrown (1986), “Cognitive Abilities and Safety on the Road: A Re-examination of Individual Differences in Dichotic Listening and Search for Embedded Figures,” Ergonomics, 29 (May), 649–63.
23.
MihalWilliam and GeraldBarrett (1976), “Individual Differences in Perceptual Information Processing and Their Relation to Automobile Involvement,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 61 (April), 229–33.
24.
MullerThomas (1984), “Buyer Response to Variation in Product Information Load,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 69 (May), 300–6.
25.
MullerThomas (1985), “Structural Information Factors Which Stimulate the Use of Nutrition Information: A Field Experiment,” Journal of Marketing Research, 22 (May), 143–57.
26.
OlsonRichard and FredAttneave (1970), “What Variables Produce Similarity Grouping,” American Journal of Psychology, 83 (March), 1–21.
27.
PaintonScott and JamesW. Gentry (1985), “Another Look at the Impact of Information Presentation Format,” Journal of Consumer Research, 12 (September), 240–4.
28.
PanekPaul, GeraldBarrett, HarveySterns, and RalphAlexander (1978), “Age Differences in Perceptual Style, Selective Attention and Perceptual-Motor Reaction Time,” Experimental Aging Research, 4 (5), 377–87.
29.
PhillipsLynn and BrianSternthal (1977), “Age Differences in Information Processing: A Perspective on the Aged Consumer,” Journal of Marketing Research, 14 (November), 444–57.
30.
PizzamiglioLuigi and PerluigiZoccolotti (1986), “Individual Differences in Cerebral Structure and Cognitive Characteristics,” in Field Dependence in Psychological Theory, Research and Applications, BertiniMario, PizzamiglioLuigi, and WapnerSeymour, eds. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
31.
RabbittPatrick (1965), “An Age Decrement in the Ability to Ignore Irrelevant Information,” Journal of Gerontology, 20 (April), 233–8.
32.
RouseSandra and WilliamRouse (1982), “Cognitive Style as a Correlate of Human Problem Solving Performance in Fault Diagnosis Tasks,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 12 (September-October), 649–52.
33.
RussoJ. Edward, RichardStaelin, CatherineA. Nolan, GaryJ. Russell, and BarbaraA. Metcalf (1986), “Nutrition Information in the Supermarket,” Journal of Consumer Research, 13 (June), 48–70.
34.
SalthouseTimothy (1985), A Theory of Cognitive Aging. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company.
35.
SalthouseTimothy, DeboraMitchell, EricSkovronek, and ReneeBabcock (1989), “Effects of Adult Age and Working Memory on Reasoning and Spatial Abilities,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15 (July), 507–16.
36.
ScammonDebra (1977), “Expectancy-Discrepant Information: Does Format Influence Effects,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 5, Keith HuntH., ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, 145–50.
37.
TongrenHale (1988), “Determinant Behavior Characteristics of Older Consumers,” Journal of Consumer Affairs, 22 (Summer), 136–57.
38.
VenkatesanM., LancasterWade, and KendallKenneth W. (1986), “An Empirical Study of Alternate Formats for Nutritional Information Disclosure in Advertising,” Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 5, 29–43.
39.
WitkinHerman, CarolMoore, DonaldGoodenough, and PatriciaCox (1977), “Field Dependent and Field Independent Cognitive Style and Their Educational Implication,” Review of Educational Research, 47 (Winter), 1–64.
40.
WitkinHerman, PhilipOltman, EvelynRaskin, and StephenKarp (1971), A Manual for the Embedded Figures Tests. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc.
41.
WitkinHerman and DonaldGoodenough (1977), “Field Dependence and Interpersonal Behavior,” Psychological Bulletin, 84 (July), 661–89.
42.
ZeithamlValarie and MaryGilly (1987) “Characteristics Affecting the Acceptance of Retailing Technologies: A Comparison of Elderly and Nonelderly Consumers,” Journal of Retailing, 63 (Spring), 49–68.
