A 16-item scale is developed to measure the degree to which salespeople practice adaptive selling—the degree to which they alter their sales presentation across and during customer interactions in response to the perceived nature of the sales situation. This paper-and-pencil scale assesses self-reports of five facets of adaptive selling: (1) recognition that different sales approaches are needed for different customers, (2) confidence in ability to use a variety of approaches, (3) confidence in ability to alter approach during an interaction, (4) collection of information to facilitate adaptation, and (5) actual use of different approaches. The reliability of the scale is .85. Support for the nomological validity of the scale is found by failure to disconfirm relationships with an antecedent (intrinsic motivation), several general personality measures of interpersonal flexibility (self-monitoring, empathy, locus of control, and androgyny), and a consequence (self-reported performance).
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BehrmanDouglas N., and PerreaultWilliam D.Jr. (1982), “Measuring the Performance of Industrial Salespersons,”Journal of Business Research, 10 (September), 355–69.
2.
BernSandra Lipsitz (1974), “The Measurement of Psychological Androgyny,”Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42 (April), 155–62.
ChurchillGilbert A.Jr., FordNeil M., HartleySteven, and WalkerOrville C.Jr. (1985), “The Determinants of Salesperson Performance: A Meta-Analysis,”Journal of Marketing Research, 22 (May), 103–18.
5.
DavisMark H. (1980), “A Multidimensional Approach to Individual Differences in Empathy,”JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85.
6.
DavisMark H. (1983), “Measuring Individual Differences in Empathy: Evidence for a Multi-Dimensional Approach,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44 (January), 113–26.
7.
DyerLee, and ParkerDonald F. (1975), “Classifying Outcomes in Work Motivation Research: An Examination of the Intrinsic-Extrinsic Dichotomy,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 60 (August), 455–8.
8.
HoganR. (1969), “Development of an Empathy Scale,”Journal of Consulting and Clincial Psychology, 33, 307–16.
9.
IngrasciHugh J. (1981), “How to Reach Buyers in Their Psychological ‘Comfort Zone’,”Industrial Marketing, 66 (July), 60–4.
10.
JohnsonJohn A., CheekJonathan M., and SmitherRobert (1983), “The Structure of Empathy,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45 (December), 1299–1312.
11.
LandyFrank J., and FarrJames L. (1980), “Performance Rating,”Psychological Bulletin, 87, 72–107.
12.
LennoxRichard D., and WolfeRaymond N. (1984), “Revision to the Self-Monitoring Scale,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46 (June), 1349–69.
13.
MerrillDavid W., and ReidRoger H. (1981), Personal Styles and Effective Performance.Radnor, PA: Chilton Book Company.
14.
MillerLynn Carol, BergJohn H., and ArcherRichard L. (1983), “Openers: Individuals Who Elicit Intimate Self-Disclosure,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 1234–44.
15.
NunnallyJum C. (1978), Psychometric Theory, 2nd ed.New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
16.
PaulhasDelroy (1983), “Sphere-Specific Measures of Perceived Control,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 1253–65.
17.
PaulhasDelroy, and MartinCarol L. (1988), “Functional Flexibility: A New Conception of Interpersonal Flexibility,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 1, 88–101.
18.
RotterJ. B. (1966), “Generalized Expectancies for Internal Versus External Control of Reinformation,”Psychological Monographs, 80 (1, whole #609).
19.
SnyderMark (1979), “Self-Monitoring Processes,” in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 12, BerkowitzL., ed. New York: Academic Press, Inc.,86–128.
20.
SpiroRosann L., and PerreaultWilliam D. (1979), “Influence Used by Industrial Salespeople: Influence Strategy Mixes and Situational Determinants,”Journal of Business, 59 (July), 435–55.
21.
SpiroRosann L., PerreaultWilliam D., and ReynoldsFred D. (1976), “The Personal Selling Process: A Critical Review and Model,”Industrial Marketing Management, 5 (Spring), 351–4.
22.
StantonWilliam J. (1984), Fundamentals of Marketing, 7th ed.New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company,469.
23.
StogdillRalph M. (1959), Individual Behavior and Group Achievement.New York: Oxford University Press.
24.
StogdillRalph M. (1963), Manual for the Leader Behavior Description Questionnaire—Form XII.Columbus, OH: Bureau of Business Research, Ohio State University.
25.
SujanHarish, and WeitzBarton (1986), “The Effects of Level and Type of Effort on Salesperson Performance,” working paper, Pennsylvania State University.
26.
WeitzBarton A. (1978), “The Relationship Between Salesperson Performance and Understanding of Customer Decision Making,”Journal of Marketing Research, 15 (November), 501–16.
27.
WeitzBarton A. (1979), “A Critical Review of Personal Selling Research: The Need for a Contingency Approach,” in Critical Issues in Sales Management: State-of-the-Art and Future Research Needs, AlbaumG., and ChurchillG., eds. Eugene, OR: College of Business Administration, University of Oregon.
28.
WeitzBarton A. (1981), “Effectiveness in Sales Interactions: A Contingency Framework,”Journal of Marketing, 45 (Winter), 85–103.
29.
WeitzBarton A., SujanHarish, and SujanMita (1986), “Knowledge, Motivation, and Adaptive Behavior: A Framework for Improving Selling Effectiveness,”Journal of Marketing, 50 (October), 174–91.
30.
WigginsJerry S., and HolzmullerAna (1981), “Further Evidence on Androgyny and Interpersonal Flexibility,”Journal of Research in Personality, 15, 67–80.
