Market pioneers outsell later entrants in both consumer and industrial markets. Entry barriers arising from preemptive positioning and switching costs have been advanced to explain this market share difference, termed “pioneering advantage.” However, empirical studies show that pioneering advantages are present even in mature markets in which brands reposition and switching costs are minimal. In these cases, the authors argue that pioneering advantage can arise from the process by which consumers learn about brands and form their preferences. This process can produce a preference structure that favors the pioneer, making it difficult for later entrants to “compete away” the pioneer's large market share, even if brands can reposition and switching costs are minimal.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Advertising Age (1983), “Study: Majority of 25 Leaders in 1923 Still on Top” (September 19), 32.
2.
AlbaJoseph W. and HutchinsonJ. Wesley (1987), “Dimensions of Consumer Expertise,” Journal of Consumer Research, 13 (March), 411–54.
3.
BarsalouLawrence W. (1982), “Context-Independent and Context-Dependent Information in Concepts,” Memory and Cognition, 10 (January), 82–93.
4.
BarsalouLawrence W. (1985), “Ideals, Central Tendency, and Frequency of Instantiation as Determinants of Graded Structure in Categories,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11 (October), 629–55.
5.
BettmanJames R. (1986), “Consumer Psychology,” Annual Review of Psychology, 37, 257–89.
6.
BondRonald S. and DavidF. Lean (1977), Sales, Promotion, and Product Differentiation in Two Prescription Drug Markets. Washington, DC: Federal Trade Commission.
7.
CarmoneFrank J., PaulE. Green, and JainArun K. (1978), “Robustness of Conjoint Analysis: Some Monté Carlo Results,” Journal of Marketing Research, 15 (May), 300–3.
8.
CarpenterGregory S. (1987), “Market Pioneering and Competitive Positioning Strategy,” Annales des Telecommunications, 42 (November-December), 699–709.
9.
CarpenterGregory S. and KentNakamoto (1987), “Market Pioneering, Learning, and Preference,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 15, HoustonM., ed. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
DeightonJohn (1984), “The Interaction of Advertising and Evidence,” Journal of Consumer Research, 11 (December), 763–70.
12.
ElioRenee and JohnR. Anderson (1984), “The Effects of Information Order and Learning Mode on Schema Abstraction,” Memory and Cognition, 12 (January), 20–30.
13.
FiskeSusan and ShelleyE. Taylor (1984), Social Cognition. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
14.
FornellClaes, WilliamT. Robinson, and BirgerWemerfelt (1985), “Consumptive Experience and Sales Promotion Expenditure,” Management Science, 31 (September), 1084–105.
15.
HochStephen J. and HaYoung-Won (1986), “Consumer Learning: Advertising and the Ambiguity of Product Experience,” Journal of Consumer Research, 13 (September), 221–33.
16.
HotellingHarold (1929), “Stability in Competition,” Economic Journal, 39, 41–57.
17.
HowardJohn A. (1989), Consumer Behavior in Marketing Strategy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
18.
HowardJohn A. and JagdishN. Sheth (1969), The Theory of Consumer Behavior. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
19.
KahnemanDaniel and JackieSnell (1988), “Predicting Utility,” in Insights in Decision Making, HogarthR., ed. Chicago: University of Chicago.
20.
LaneW. J. (1980). “Product Differentiation in a Market with Endogenous Sequential Entry,” Bell Journal of Economics, 11 (Spring), 237–60.
21.
LiebermanMarvin B. and DavidB. Montgomery (1988), “First-Mover Advantages,” Strategic Management Journal, 9 (January-February), 41–58.
22.
MarksLawrence J. and JerryOlson (1981), “Toward a Cognitive Structure Conceptualization of Product Familiarity,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 8, KentB. Monroe, ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research.
23.
MedinDouglas L. and MargueriteM. Schaffer (1978), “Context Theory of Classification Learning,” Psychological Review, 85 (May), 207–38.
24.
MeyerRobert J. (1986), “A Theory of the Inductive Learning of Multiattribute Preferences,” in Perspectives on Methodology in Consumer Research, BrinbergD. and LutzR. J., eds. New York: Springer Verlag.
25.
MeyerRobert J. (1987), “The Learning of Multiattribute Judgment Policies,” Journal of Consumer Research, 14 (September), 155–73.
26.
PrescottEdward C. and MichaelVisscher (1977), “Sequential Location Among Firms with Foresight,” Bell Journal of Economics, 8 (Autumn), 378–93.
27.
RobinsonWilliam T. (1988), “Sources of Market Pioneer Advantages: The Case of Industrial Goods Industries,” Journal of Marketing Research, 25 (February), 87–94.
28.
RobinsonWilliam T. and ClaesFornell (1985), “Sources of Market Pioneering Advantages in Consumer Goods Industries,” Journal of Marketing Research, 22 (August), 305–18.
29.
SchmalenseeRichard (1982), “Product Differentiation Advantages of Pioneering Brands,” American Economic Review, 72 (June), 349–65.
30.
SchwarzGideon and AmosTversky (1980), “On the Reciprocity of Proximity Relations,” Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 22 (December), 157–75.
31.
StiglerGeorge J. and GaryS. Becker (1977), “De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum,” American Economic Review, 67 (March), 76–90.
32.
SujanMita (1985), “Consumer Knowledge: Effects of Evaluation Strategies Mediating Consumer Judgments,” Journal of Consumer Research, 12 (June), 31–46.
33.
TverskyAmos and HutchinsonJ. Wesley (1986), “Nearest Neighbor Analysis of Psychological Spaces,” Psychological Review, 93 (January), 3–22.
34.
TverskyAmos and HutchinsonJ. Wesley and DanielKahneman (1974), “Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases,” Science, 185, 1124–31.
35.
UrbanGlen, TheresaCarter, SteveGaskin, and ZofiaMucha (1986), “Market Share Rewards to Pioneering Brands: An Empirical Analysis and Strategic Implications,” Management Science, 32 (June), 645–59.
