The authors examine, in the context of Crawford's 1970 study, changes in marketing professionals’ research ethics judgments and the influence of organizational factors on those judgments. The results indicate several significant changes in ethical judgments. In addition, they suggest that three organizational factors—extent of ethical problems within the organization, top management actions on ethics, and organizational role (researchers vs. executives)—underlie differences in ethical judgments.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArmstrongScott J. and TerryS. Overton (1977), “Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys,” Journal of Marketing Research, 14 (August), 396–402.
2.
BaumhartRaymond C. (1961), “How Ethical are Businessmen?” Harvard Business Review, 39 (July-August), 6–19, 156–76.
3.
BezillaRobert, JoelB. Haynes, and CliffordElliot (1976), “Ethics in Marketing Research,” Business Horizons, 19 (April), 83–6.
4.
BrennerSteven N. and EarlA. Molander (1977), “Is the Ethics of Business Changing?” Harvard Business Review, 55 (January-February), 57–71.
5.
CrawfordMerle C. (1970), “Attitudes of Marketing Executives Toward Ethics in Marketing Research,” Journal of Marketing, 34 (April), 46–52.
6.
Ethics Resource Center (1979), Codes of Ethics in Corporations and Trade Associations and the Teaching of Ethics in Graduate Business Schools. Princeton, NJ: Opinion Research Corporation.
7.
FerrellO. C. and GreshamLarry G. (1985), “A Contingency Framework for Understanding Ethical Decision-Making in Marketing,” Journal of Marketing, 49 (Summer), 87–96.
8.
FerrellO. C. and GreshamLarry G. and SkinnerSteven J. (1988), “Ethical Behavior and Bureaucratic Structure in Marketing Research Organizations,” Journal of Marketing Research, 25 (February), 103–9.
9.
Fortune (1986), “The Decline and Fall of Business Ethics (Profit-at-Any-Price Malaise is Spreading Through Investment Banking and Reaching Into Industries as Well)” (December), 65-6.
10.
HuntShelby D., LawrenceB. Chonko, and WilcoxJames B. (1984), “Ethical Problems of Marketing Researchers,” Journal of Marketing Research, 21 (August), 309–24.
11.
HuntShelby D., LawrenceB. Chonko, and WilcoxJames B. and VitellScott (1986), “A General Theory of Marketing Ethics,” Journal of Macromarketing (Spring), 5–16.
12.
LaczniakGene R. (1983), “Business Ethics: A Manager's Primer,” Business, 33 (January-March), 23–9.
13.
McDanielStephen W., VerillePerry, and MaddenCharles S. (1985), “The Threats to Marketing Research: An Empirical Reappraisal,” Journal of Marketing Research, 22 (February), 74–80.
14.
MurphyPatrick E. and GeneR. Laczniak (1981), “Marketing Ethics: A Review with Implications for Managers, Educators and Researchers,” in Review of Marketing 1981, BenM. Enis and KennethJ. Roering, eds. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 251–66.
15.
Newsweek (1988), “Business Ethics for Sale” (May9), 56.
16.
SchleiferS. (1985), “Results of Walker's 1984 Industry Image Study,” Marketing Researcher (Winter), Walker Research Incorporated.
17.
SchneiderKenneth and CynthiaK. Holm (1982), “Deceptive Practices in Marketing Research: The Consumer's Viewpoint,” California Management Review, 24 (Spring), 89–96.
18.
TaylorPaul W. (1975), Principles of Ethics: An Introduction. Encino, CA: Dickensen Publishing Company, Inc.
19.
Time (1987), “Cover Story: What Ever Happened to Ethics?” (May25), 14-29.
20.
TrevinoLinda Klebe (1986), “Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person-Situation Interactionist Model,” Academy of Management Review, 11, 601–17.
21.
TyboutAlice M. and GeraldZaltman (1974), “Ethics in Marketing Research: Their Practical Relevance,” Journal of Marketing Research, 11 (November), 357–68.
22.
Zey-FerrellMary and FerrellO. C. (1982), “Role-Set Configuration and Opportunity as Predictors of Unethical Behavior in Organizations,” Human Relations, 35 (7), 587–604.
