The Use of Product Sampling and Advertising: Effects of Sequence of Exposure and Degree of Advertising Claim Exaggeration on Consumers’ Belief Strength,Belief Confidence,and Attitudes
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online August, 1988
The Use of Product Sampling and Advertising: Effects of Sequence of Exposure and Degree of Advertising Claim Exaggeration on Consumers’ Belief Strength,Belief Confidence,and Attitudes
Using Smith and Swinyard's integrated information response model as a theoretical foundation, the authors investigate the effects of sequence of exposure to exaggerated advertising and product sampling on subjects’ belief strength, belief confidence, attitude, and purchase intention toward a product. Consistent with the model's assumptions, belief and attitudinal confidence are found to be higher for subjects exposed to product sampling alone than for those exposed only to product advertising. Attitude change is significantly greater for subjects receiving an advertising-sample exposure sequence than for those exposed to the reverse sequence, supporting the model's contention that indirect product experiences create low order beliefs that are more susceptable to change than the higher order beliefs created by direct product experience. When the subjects received a negatively disconfirming experience, those who had been exposed to highly exaggerated advertisements had greater shifts in attitude than those exposed to slight exaggeration. This effect was greater for global attitude measures when the advertisement was highly exaggerated. Finally, measures of product attitude and behavioral intentions for subjects exposed to greatly exaggerated advertising in an advertisement-sampling sequence are found generally to be lower than those for subjects exposed to sampling alone, indicating a contrast effect.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonRolphe E. (1973), “Consumer Dissatisfaction: The Effect of Disconfirmed Expectancy on Perceived Product Performance,”Journal of Marketing Research, 10(February), 38–44.
2.
BennettPeter D., and HarrellGilbert D. (1975), “The Role of Confidence in Understanding and Predicting Buyers’ Attitudes and Purchase Intentions,”Journal of Consumer Research, 2(September), 110–17.
3.
BerscheidEllen, and GrazianoWilliam, MonsonThomas, and DermerMarshall (1976), “Outcome Dependency: Attention, Attribution, and Attraction,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(November), 978–89.
4.
BettingerCharles O., DawsonLyndon E.Jr., and WalesHugh G. (1979), “The Impact of Free-Sample Advertising,”Journal of Advertising Research, 19(June), 35–9.
5.
BettmanJames R., and CaponNoel, and LutzRichard J. (1975), “Cognitive Algebra in Multi-Attribute Attitude Models,”Journal of Marketing Research, 12(May), 151–64.
6.
CardozoRichard N. (1965), “An Experimental Study of Customer Effort, Expectation, and Satisfaction,”Journal of Marketing Research, 2(August), 244–9.
CohenJoel B., and GoldbergMarvin E. (1970), “The Dissonance Model in Post-Decision Product Evaluation,”Journal of Marketing Research, 1(August), 315–21.
9.
DoverPhilip A., and OlsonJerry C. (1977), “Dynamic Changes in an Expectancy-Value Attitude Model as a Function of Multiple Exposures to Product Information,” in Contemporary Marketing Thought, GreenbergB. A., and BellengerD. N., eds. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 455–9.
10.
FestingerLeon (1957), A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance.New York: Harper & Row.
11.
FinePhyllis (1985), “Smells that Sell,”Marketing and Media Decisions, 20(December), 78–81, 124, 126.
12.
FishbeinMartin, and AjzenIcek (1975), Beliefs, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
13.
FreedmanAlix M. (1986), “Use of Free Product Samples Wins New Favor as Sales Tool,”Wall Street Journal (August 28), 17.
14.
HammB. Curtis, and PerryMichael, and WynnHugh F. (1969), “The Effect of a Free Sample on Image and Attitude,”Journal of Advertising Research, 9(December), 35–7.
15.
HeiseDavid R. (1970), “The Semantic Differential and Attitude Research,” in Attitude Measurement, SummersGene F., ed. Chicago: Rand McNally & Co., 235–53.
16.
HolmesJohn H., and LettJohn D.Jr. (1977), “Product Sampling and Word of Mouth,”Journal of Advertising Research, 17(October), 35–40.
17.
HovlandCarl I., and HarveyO. J., and SherifMuzafer (1957), “Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Reaction to Communication and Attitude Change,”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 55(September), 244–52.
18.
KaminsMichael A. (1985), “The Effect of Two-Sided Appeals Upon Post-Trial Performance Evaluation, Advertiser Credibility, and the Disconfirmation Level,” in Recherches sur la Communication/Promotion, Proceedings of the 12th International Research Seminar in Marketing, La Londe les Maures, France, 86–108.
19.
LaTourStephen A., and MiniardPaul W. (1983), “The Misuse of Repeated Measures Analysis in Marketing Research,”Journal of Marketing Research, 20(February), 45–57.
20.
LemonNigel F. (1968), “A Model of the Extremity, Confidence and Salience of an Opinion,”British Journal of Sociology and Clinical Psychology, 7(June), 106–14.
21.
MeyerEd (1982), “Sampling Builds Better Business,”Advertising Age (July 12), M-22.
22.
OliverRichard L. (1977), “Effect of Expectation and Disconfirmation on Postexposure Product Evaluations: An Alternative Interpretation,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 62(August), 480–86.
23.
OliverRichard L. (1980), “A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions, Journal of Marketing Research, 17(November), 460–9.
24.
OlshavskyRichard, and MillerJohn A. (1972), “Consumer Expectations, Product Performance, and Perceived Product Quality,”Journal of Marketing Research, 9(February), 19–21.
25.
OlsonJerry C., and DoverPhilip (1976), “Effects of Expectations, Product Performance and Disconfirmation on Belief Elements of Cognitive Structure,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 3, AndersonBeverlee B., ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, 168–75.
26.
OlsonJerry C., and DoverPhilip (1979), “Disconfirmation and Consumer Expectations Through Product Trial,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 64(April), 179–89.
27.
OsgoodCharles E., SuciGeorge J., and TannenbaumPercy H. (1957), The Measurement of Meaning.Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
28.
PeterJ. Paul, and OlsonJerry C. (1987), Consumer Behavior: Marketing Strategy Perspectives.Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.
29.
ScottCarol A. (1976), “The Effect of Trial and Incentives on Repeat Purchase Behavior,”Journal of Marketing Research, 13(August), 263–9.
30.
ScottCarol A. (1978), “Attribution Theory in Consumer Research: Scope, Issues and Contributions,” in Research Frontiers in Marketing: Dialogues and Directions, Educators’ Proceedings, Vol. 5, JainSubhash C., ed. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 169–73.
31.
ScottCarol A., and YalchRichard F. (1978), “A Test of the Self-Perception Explanation of the Effects of Rewards on Intrinsic Interest,”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14(March), 180–92.
32.
SherifCaroline, and SherifMuzifer, and NebergallRobert E. (1965), Attitude and Attitude Change.Philadelphia: W. G. Sanders.
33.
SherifMuzifer, and HovlandCarl I.(1961), Social Judgment: Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Communication and Attitude Change.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
34.
SmithRobert E. (1982), “The Structure and Influence of Confidence,” working paper, Indiana University.
35.
SmithRobert E., and SwinyardWilliam R. (1982), “Information Response Models: An Integrated Approach,”Journal of Marketing, 46(Winter), 81–93.
36.
SmithRobert E., and SwinyardWilliam R. (1983a), “Cognitive Dimensions of Consumer Response to Advertising and Trial for Low Involvement Products: Belief Strength, Belief Confidence, and Curiosity,” working paper, Indiana University.
37.
SmithRobert E., and SwinyardWilliam R. (1983b), “Attitude–Behavior Consistency: The Impact of Product Trial Versus Advertising,”Journal of Marketing Research, 20(August), 257–67.
38.
WarlandRex H., and SampleJohn (1973), “Response Certainty as a Moderator Variable in Attitude Measurement,”Rural Sociology, 38(Summer), 174–86.
39.
WilkieWilliam L., and PessemierEdgar A. (1973), “Issues in Marketing's Use of Multi-Attribute Attitude Models,”Journal of Marketing Research, 10(November), 428–41.
40.
WyckhamRobert G. (1985), “Implied Superiority Claims: Parity Parading as Superiority,” in Recherches sur la Communication/Promotion, Proceedings of the 12th International Research Seminar in Marketing, La Londe les Maures, France, 360–87.
41.
WyerRobert S.Jr. (1973), “Category Ratings as ‘Subjective Expected Values’: Implications for Attitude Formation and Change,”Psychological Review, 80(November), 446–67.
