The authors conducted a meta-analysis of the generics literature. The meta-analysis reveals the strongest predictors of a proneness to buy generic products are consumer perceptions of generics’ quality and price and consumers’ overall evaluation of generic products. Demographic and psychographic variables and consumer shopping behaviors are related only weakly to consumers’ proneness to buy generics.
Business Week (1981), “No-Frills Food: New Power for the Supermarkets” (March23), 70–80.
3.
ChurchillGilbert A.Jr., FordNeil M., StevenW. HartleyJr., and OrvilleC. WalkerJr. (1985), “The Determinants of Salesperson Performance: A Meta-Analysis,” Journal of Marketing Research, 22 (May), 103–18.
4.
CohenJacob and PatriciaCohen (1983), Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
5.
CunninghamIsabella, AndrewP. Hardy, and GiovannaImperia (1982), “Generic Brands Versus National Brands and Stores’ Brands,” Journal of Advertising Research, 22 (October/November), 25–32.
6.
DietrichRobert (1978), “A First-Time Look at How Shoppers React to Generic Products,” Progressive Grocer, 57 (February), 80–4.
7.
FariaAnthony J. (1980), “The New Battle of the Brands: Purchase Patterns for Generics After Two Years in the Market,” in Developments in Marketing Science, Vol. 3, BellurV. V., ed. Dallas: Academy of Marketing Science, 229–33.
8.
GlassGene V., McGawBarry, and SmithMary L. (1981), Meta-Analysis in Social Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
9.
HarrisBrian F. and RogerA. Strang (1985), “Marketing Strategies in the Age of Generics,” Journal of Marketing, 49 (Fall), 70–81.
10.
HawesJon M. (1982), Retailing Strategies for Generic Brand Grocery Products. Ann Arbor, MI: UMI Research Press.
11.
HunterJohn E., FrankL. Schmidt, and JacksonGregg B. (1982), Meta-Analysis: Cumulating Research Findings Across Studies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
12.
IaffaldanoMichelle T. and PaulM. Muchinsky (1985), “Job Satisfaction and Job Performance: A Meta-Analysis,” Psychological Bulletin, 97 (March), 251–73.
13.
JohnsonDavid W., RogerT. Johnson, and GeoffreyMaruyama (1983), “Interdependence and Interpersonal Attraction Among Heterogeneous and Homogeneous Individuals: A Theoretical Formulation and a Meta-analysis of the Research,” Review of Educational Research, 53 (Spring), 5–54.
14.
McEnallyMartha R. and JonM. Hawes (1984), “The Market for Generic Brand Grocery Products: A Review and Extension,” Journal of Marketing, 48 (Winter), 75–83.
15.
PetersonRobert, GeraldAlbaum, and RichardBeltramini (1985), “A Meta-Analysis of Effect Sizes in Consumer Behavior Experiments,” Journal of Consumer Research, 12 (June), 97–103.
16.
RosenDennis L. (1984), “Consumer Perceptions of Quality for Generic Grocery Products: A Comparison Across Product Categories,” Journal of Retailing, 60 (Winter), 64–80.
17.
SchwabDonald P., Olian-GottliebJudy D., and HerbertG. HenemanIII (1979), “Between-Subjects Expectancy Theory Research: A Statistical Review of Studies Predicting Effort and Performance,” Psychological Bulletin, 86 (January), 139–47.
18.
Selling Areas Marketing, Inc. (1986), “An Exclusive SAMI Analysis of Generic and Private Labels” (May), 1.
StrangRoger A., BrianF. Harris, and HernandezAllan L. (1979), “Consumer Trial of Generic Products in Supermarkets: An Exploratory Study,” in Educators’ Conference Proceedings, Series 44, NeilBeckwith et al., eds. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 386–8.
21.
WilkesRobert E. and HumbertoValencia (1985), “A Note on Generic Purchase Generalizations and Subcultural Variations,” Journal of Marketing, 49 (Summer), 114–20.
22.
WonnacottThomas H. and RonaldJ. Wonnacott (1981), Regression: A Second Course in Statistics. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
