Using the information processing approach adopted by Harkins and Petty, the authors find the polarization of thoughts and attitudes in response to strong versus weak arguments to be greater when subjects are exposed to multiple message sources rather than to a single source.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AschSolomon E. (1951). “Effects of Group Pressure Upon Modification and Distortion of Judgment,” in Group Leadership and Men, GuetzkowH., ed. Pittsburgh: Carnegie Press, 177–90.
2.
BelchGeorge E. (1980), “An Investigation of the Effects of Advertising Message Structure and Repetition Upon Cognitive Processes Mediating Message Acceptance,” unpublished doctoral dissertation, Graduate School of Management, University of California, Los Angeles.
3.
HarkinsStephen G. and RichardE. Petty (1981a), “The Effects of Source Magnification of Cognitive Effort on Attitudes: An Information Processing View,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40 (March), 401–13.
4.
HarkinsStephen G. and RichardE. Petty (1981b), “The Multiple Source Effect in Persuasion: The Effects of Distraction,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1 (December), 627–35.
5.
HarkinsStephen G. and RichardE. Petty (1983), “Social Context Effects in Persuasion: The Effects of Multiple Sources and Multiple Targets,” in Basic Group Processes, PaulPaulus, ed. New York: Springer-Verlag, 149–75.
6.
HarkinsStephen G. and RichardE. Petty (1987), “Information Utility and the Multiple Source Effect,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52 (February), 260–8.
7.
LatanéBibb (1981), “The Psychology of Social Impact,” American Psychologist, 4 (April), 343–56.
8.
PettyRichard E. and JohnT. Cacioppo (1979), “Issue-Involvement Can Increase or Decrease Persuasion by Enhancing Message-Relevant Cognitive Responses,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37 (October), 1915–26.
9.
PettyRichard E. and JohnT. Cacioppo (1986), “The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion,” in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 19, BerkowitzL., ed. New York: Academic Press, Inc., 123–205.
