The authors compare the relative effectiveness of comparative/noncomparative and product-based/non-product-based advertising in the implementation of an associative strategy for cognitive brand positioning. Two metaconstructs, cognitive accuracy and cognitive clarity, are defined, each within an attitude model and a probabilistic multidimensional scaling model. The results from these very different methodological and conceptual approaches indicate that direct comparative advertisements are superior in engendering overall brand positioning, whereas only product-based direct comparative ads are superior in engendering brand positioning at the attribute level, and only in terms of positioning clarity.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AshStephen B. and WeeChow-Hou (1983), “Comparative Advertising: A Review with Implications for Further Research,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 10, RichardP. Bagozzi and AliceM. Tybout, eds. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, 370–6.
2.
BarnettV. (1973), Comparative Statistical Inference. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
3.
BassFrank M. and TalarzykW. Wayne (1972), “An Attitude Model for the Study of Brand Preference,” Journal of Marketing Research, 9 (February), 93–6.
4.
BelchGeorge E. (1981), “An Examination of Comparative and Noncomparative Television Commercials: The Effects of Claim Variation and Repetition on Cognitive Response and Message Acceptance,” Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (August), 333–49.
5.
CarrollJ. Douglas and ArabiePhipps (1980), “Multidimensional Scaling,” in Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 31, MarkR. Rosenzweig and LymanW. Porter, eds. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews Inc., 607–49.
6.
CarrollJ. Douglas and ArabiePhipps and ChangJih-Jie (1970), “How to Use PROFIT, a Computer Program for Property Fitting by Optimizing Non-Linear or Linear Correlations.” Murray Hill, NJ: Bell Telephone Laboratories.
7.
CliffNorman (1966), “Orthogonal Rotation to Congruence,” Psychometrika, 31 (March), 33–42.
8.
ColleyRussell H. (1961), Defining Advertising Goals for Measured Advertising Results. New York: Association of National Advertisers.
9.
CoombsClyde H. (1964), A Theory of Data. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
10.
DeightonJohn (1984), “The Interaction of Advertising and Evidence,” Journal of Consumer Research, 11 (December), 763–70.
11.
FazioR. H. and ZannaM. P. (1981), “Direct Experience and Attitude-Behavior Consistency,” in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 14, BerkowitzL., ed. New York: Academic Press, Inc.161–202.
12.
FinnDavid W. (1982), “It Is Time to Lay the Low-Involvement Hierarchy to Rest,” in An Assessment of Marketing Thought and Practice, WalkerB. et al., eds. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 99–103.
13.
FinnDavid W. (1984), “The Integrated Information Response Model,” Journal of Advertising, 13 (Winter), 24–33.
14.
FishbeinM. and AjzenI. (1975), Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
15.
FornellClaes and DanielR. Denison (1982), “A New Approach to Nonlinear Structural Modeling by Use of Confirmatory Multidimensional Scaling,” in A Second Generation of Multivariate Analysis, ClaesFornell, ed. New York: Praeger Publishers, 367–92.
16.
GardnerMeryl Paula (1985), “Does Attitude Toward the Ad Affect Brand Attitude Under a Brand Evaluation Set?” Journal of Marketing Research, 22 (May), 192–8.
17.
GoldenLinda L. (1979), “Consumer Reactions to Explicit Brand Comparisons in Advertisements,” Journal of Marketing Research, 16 (November), 517–32.
18.
GoodwinStephen and MichaelEtgar (1980), “An Experimental Investigation of Comparative Advertising: Impact of Message Appeal, Information Load, and Utility of Product Class,” Journal of Marketing Research, 17 (May), 187–202.
19.
GornGerald J. and CharlesB. Weinberg (1984), “The Impact of Comparative Advertising on Perception and Attitude: Some Positive Findings,” Journal of Consumer Research, 11 (September), 719–27.
20.
GreenPaul E. and FrankJ. Cannone (1970), Multidimensional Scaling and Related Techniques in Marketing Analysis. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.
21.
HacklemanEdwin C. and SubhashC. Jain (1979), “An Experimental Analysis of Attitude Toward Comparison and Non Comparison Advertising,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 6, WilliamL. Wilkie, ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, 90–4.
22.
HauserJohn R. and FrankS. Koppelman (1979), “Alternative Perceptual Mapping Techniques: Relative Accuracy and Usefulness,” Journal of Marketing Research, 16 (November), 495–506.
23.
HauserJohn R. and FrankS. Koppelman and PatriciaSimmie (1981), “Profit Maximizing Perceptual Positions: An Integrated Theory of the Selection of Product Features and Price,” Management Science, 27 (January), 33–56.
24.
HefnerR. A. (1958), “Extensions of the Law of Comparative Judgment to Discriminable and Multidimensional Stimuli,” doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan.
25.
HorneDavid A. and MichaelD. Johnson (1986), “Subject/Referent Position in Comparative Advertising,” University of Michigan Working Paper No. 461 (June).
26.
InskoChester A. and JohnSchopler (1967), “Triadic Consistency: A Statement of Affective-Cognitive-Conative Consistency,” Psychological Review, 74 (September), 361–76.
27.
JainSubhash C. and EdwinC. Hackleman (1978), “How Effective is Comparison Advertising for Stimulating Brand Recall?” Journal of Advertising, 7 (Summer), 20–5.
28.
KeonJohn W. (1983), “Product Positioning: TRINODAL Mapping of Brand Images, Ad Images, and Consumer Preference,” Journal of Marketing Research, 20 (November), 380–92.
29.
KeonJohn W. (1983/1984), “Copy Testing for Imagery Products,” Journal of Advertising Research, 23 (December/January), 41–8.
30.
KrugmanHerbert E. (1965), “The Impact of Television Advertising: Learning Without Involvement,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 29 (Fall), 349–56.
31.
KrugmanHerbert E. (1972), “Why Three Exposures May Be Enough,” Journal of Advertising Research, 12 (December), 11–14.
32.
LambCharles W.Jr., WilliamM. Pride, and BarbaraA. Pletcher (1978), “A Taxonomy for Comparative Advertising Research,” Journal of Advertising, 7 (Winter), 43–7.
33.
LautmanMartin R., LarryH. Percy, and KordishGail R. (1978), “Campaigns from Multidimensional Scaling,” Journal of Advertising Research, 18 (June), 35–40.
34.
LavidgeRobert J. and GaryA. Steiner (1961), “A Model for Predictive Measurement of Advertising Effectiveness,” Journal of Marketing, 25 (October), 59–62.
35.
LingoesJames C. (1977), Geometric Representations of Relational Data. Ann Arbor, MI: Mathesis.
36.
MacKayDavid B. (1983), “Alternate Probabilistic Scaling Models for Spatial Data,” Geographical Analysis, 15 (July), 173–86.
37.
MacKayDavid B. and JosephL. Zinnes (1981), “Probabilistic Scaling of Spatial Distance Judgements,” Geographical Analysis, 13 (January), 21–37.
38.
MacKayDavid B. and JosephL. Zinnes (1984), “PROSCAL: A Program for Probabilistic Scaling,” Discussion Paper 218, Indiana University (May).
39.
MacKayDavid B. and JosephL. Zinnes (1986), “A Probabilistic Model for the Multidimensional Scaling of Proximity and Preference Data,” Marketing Science, 5 (Fall), 325–44.
40.
MacKenzieScott and RichardLutz (1983), “Testing Competing Models of Advertising Effectiveness via Structural Equation Models,” in Research Methods and Causal Modeling in Marketing, DardenWilliam, MonroeKent, and WilliamDillon, eds. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 70–5.
41.
MazisMichael B., OlliT. Ahtola, and KlippelR. Eugene (1975), “A Comparison of Four Multi-Attribute Models in the Prediction of Consumer Attitudes,” Journal of Consumer Research, 2 (June), 38–52.
42.
McDougallGordon H. G. (1976), “Comparative Advertising: An Empirical Investigation of Its Role in Consumer Information,” University of Western Ontario Working Paper #167.
43.
MitchellAndrew A. and JerryC. Olson (1981), “Are Product Attribute Beliefs the Only Mediator of Advertising Effects on Brand Attitudes?” Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (August), 318–31.
44.
MoinpourReza, JamesM. McCullough, and DouglasL. MacLachlan (1976), “Time Changes in Perception: A Longitudinal Application of Multidimensional Scaling,” Journal of Marketing Research, 13 (August), 245–53.
45.
MooreWilliam L. and MorrisB. Holbrook (1982), “On the Predictive Validity of Joint Space Models in Consumer Evaluations of New Concepts,” Journal of Consumer Research, 9 (September), 206–10.
46.
MurphyJohn H. and MaryS. Amundsen (1981), “Th Communications-Effectiveness of Comparative Advertising for a New Brand on Users of the Dominant Brand,” Journal of Advertising, 10 (Winter), 14–20.
47.
O'BrienTerrence (1971), “Stages of Consumer Decision-Making,” Journal of Marketing Research, 8 (August), 283–9.
48.
PaldaKristian S. (1966), “The Hypothesis of a Hierarchy of Effects: A Partial Evaluation,” Journal of Marketing Research, 3 (February), 13–24.
49.
PatnaikP. B. (1949), “The Non-Central Chi-Square and F Distributions and Their Applications,” Biometrika, 36, 203–32.
50.
PrasadV. Kanti (1976), “Communication Effectiveness of Comparative Advertising: A Laboratory Analysis,” Journal of Marketing Research, 13 (May), 128–37.
RamsayJames O. (1977), “Maximum Likelihood Estimation in Multidimensional Scaling,” Psychometrika, 42 (June), 241–65.
53.
RamsayJames O. (1978), MULTISCALE: Four Programs of Multidimensional Scaling by the Method of Maximum Likelihood. Chicago: International Educational Services.
54.
RamsayJames O. (1980), “Some Small Sample Results for Maximum Likelihood Estimation in Multidimensional Scaling,” Psychometrika, 45 (March), 139–44.
55.
RamsayJames O. (1982), “Some Statistical Approaches to Multidimensional Scaling Data,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 145: Part 3 (presented in February), 285–312.
56.
RayMichael L. (1973), “Marketing Communications and the Hierarchy of Effects,” in New Models for Mass Communications, ClarkeP., ed. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, Inc., 147–76.
57.
RiesAl and JackTrout (1981), Positioning: The Battle for Your Mind. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
58.
RyanMichael J. (1978), “An Examination of an Alternative Form of the Behavioral Intention Model's Normative Component,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 5, Keith HuntH., ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, 283–9.
59.
RyanMichael J. (1982), “Behavioral Intention Formation: The Inter-dependency of Attitudinal and Social Influence Variables,” Journal of Consumer Research, 9 (December), 263–78.
60.
RyanMichael J. and MichaelJ. Etzel (1976), “The Nature of Salient Outcomes and Referents in the Extended Model,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 3, BeverleeB. Anderson, ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, 485–90.
61.
SchiffmanSusan S., ReynoldsM. Lance, and YoungForrest W. (1981), Introduction to Multidimensional Scaling. New York: Academic Press, Inc.
62.
SeggevEli (1982), “Testing Persuasion by Strategic Positioning,” Journal of Advertising Research, 22 (February/March), 37–42.
63.
ShepardRoger N., RomneyKimball, and NerloveSara Beth (1972), Multidimensional Scaling, Vols. I and II. New York: Seminar Press.
64.
ShimpTerence A. and DavidC. Dyer (1978), “The Effects of Comparative Advertising Mediated by Market Position of Sponsoring Brand,” Journal of Advertising, 7 (Summer), 13–19.
65.
ShimpTerence A. and DavidC. Dyer and YokumJ. Thomas (1982), “Advertising Inputs and Psychophysical Judgments in Vending-Machine Retailing,” Journal of Retailing, 58 (Spring), 95–113.
66.
SmithRobert E. (1982), “The Structures and Influence of Confidence,” working paper, Indiana University.
67.
SmithRobert E. and RobertF. Lusch (1976), “How Advertising Can Position a Brand,” Journal of Advertising Research, 16 (February), 37–43.
68.
SmithRobert E. and RobertF. Lusch and WilliamSwinyard (1982), “Information Response Models: An Integrated Approach,” Journal of Marketing, 46 (Winter), 81–93.
69.
SmithRobert E. and RobertF. Lusch and WilliamSwinyard (1983), “Attitude-Behavior Consistency: The Impact of Product Trial Versus Advertising,” Journal of Marketing Research, 20 (August), 257–67.
70.
SwinyardWilliam R. (1981), “The Interaction Between Comparative Advertising and Copy Claim Variation,” Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (May), 175–86.
71.
TakaneYoshio (1981), “Multidimensional Successive Categories Scaling: A Maximum Likelihood Method,” Psychometrika, 46 (March), 9–28.
72.
ThurstoneL. L. (1927), “A Law of Comparative Judgment,” Psychological Review, 34 (July), 273–86.
73.
TverskyAmos (1977), “Features of Similarity,” Psychological Review, 84 (July), 327–52.
74.
WalkerBeth A., JohnL. Swasy, and RethansArno J. (1986), “The Impact of Comparative Advertising on Perception Formation in New Product Introductions,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 13, RichardJ. Lutz, ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, 121–5.
75.
WilkesRobert E. (1977), “Product Positioning by Multidimensional Scaling,” Journal of Advertising Research, 17 (August), 15–19.
76.
WilkieWilliam L. and PaulW. Farris (1975), “Comparison Advertising: Problems and Potential,” Journal of Marketing, 39 (October), 7–15.
77.
WilsonR. Dale (1976), “An Empirical Evaluation of Comparative Advertising Messages: Subjects’ Responses on Perceptual Dimensions,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 3, BeverleeB. Anderson, ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, 53–7.
78.
WilsonR. Dale and AydinMuderrisoglu (1979), “Strength of Claims in Comparative Advertising: A Study of Competitive Vigor,” in Educators’ Conference Proceedings, Series 44, NeilBeckwith, MichaelHouston, RobertMittelstaedt, KentB. Monroe, and ScottWard, eds. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 361–6.
79.
WilsonR. Dale and AydinMuderrisoglu (1980), “An Analysis of Cognitive Responses to Comparative Advertising,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 7, JerryC. Olson, ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, 566–71.
80.
YoungForrest W. (1984), “Scaling,” in Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 35, MarkR. Rosenzweig and LymanW. Porter, eds. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews Inc., 55–81.
81.
ZinnesJoseph L. and DavidB. MacKay (1983), “Probabilistic Multidimensional Scaling: Complete and Incomplete Data,” Psychometrika, 48 (March), 47–8.
