Recognition tests are a very popular means of assessing the memory effectiveness of advertisements. Unfortunately the recognition scores obtained by current methods reflect both the memory for an advertisement and the response biases of the respondents. The authors introduce the theory of signal detection (TSD) which can be used to secure independent estimates of memory and response bias in recognition tests. They discuss how TSD can be used to improve ad recognition testing.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AppelValentine, and BlumMilton L. (1961), “Ad Recognition and Respondent Set,”Journal of Advertising Research, 1(June), 13–21.
2.
BanksW. P. (1970), “Signal Detection Theory and Human Memory,”Psychological Bulletin, 74(August), 81–99.
3.
BowerG. H., and GlassA. L. (1976), “Structural Limits and the Reintegrative Power of Picture Fragments,”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2(July), 456–66.
4.
ClancyK. J., and OstlundL. E., and WynerG. A. (1979), “False Reporting of Magazine Readership,”Journal of Advertising Research, 19(October), 23–30.
5.
CoombsC. H., and DawesR. M., and TverskyA. (1970), Mathematical Psychology.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
6.
CorsoJ. F. (1967), The Experimental Psychology of Sensory Behavior.New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
7.
CronbachL. J. (1950), “Further Evidence on Response Sets and Test Design,”Educational and Psychological Measurement, 10(Spring), 3–31.
8.
DavenportJ. S., and ParkerE. B., and SmithS. A. (1962), “Measuring Readership of Newspaper Advertisements,”Journal of Advertising Research, 2(December), 2–9.
9.
EganJ. P., and ClarkeF. R. (1966), “Psychophysics and Signal Detection,” in SidowskiJ. B., ed. Experimental Methods and Instrumentation in Psychology.New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
10.
ElliottP. B. (1964), “Tables of d’,” in Signal Detection and Recognition by Human Observers, SwetsJ. A., ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
11.
FrazenR. (1942), “Inequalities Which Affect Scores on Advertisements,”Journal of Marketing, 6(April), 128–32.
12.
GlassA. L., and HolyoakK. J., and SantaJ. L. (1979), Cognition.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
13.
GreenD. M., and SwetsJ. A. (1966), Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics.New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
14.
GrierJ. B. (1971), “Nonparametric Indexes for Sensitivity and Bias: Computing Formulas,”Psychological Bulletin, 75(June) 424–9.
15.
GuilfordJ. P. (1967), “Response Biases and Response Sets,” in Readings in Attitude Theory and Measurement, FishbeinMartin, ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
16.
HodosW. (1970), “A Nonparametric Index of Response Bias for Use in Detection and Recognition Experiments,”Psychological Bulletin, 74(November), 351–4.
17.
KlatzkyR. L. (1980), Human Memory: Structures and Processes.San Francisco: W. H. Freeman & Company.
18.
LucasD. B. (1942), “A Controlled Recognition Technique for Measuring Magazine Advertising Audiences,”Journal of Marketing, 6(October), 133–6.
19.
LucasD. B., and BrittS. H. (1963), Measuring Advertising Effectiveness.New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
20.
MarderEric, and DavidM. (1961), “Recognition of Ad Elements: Recall or Projection?,”Journal of Advertising Research, 1(December), 23–5.
21.
MoranW. T. (1951a), “Measuring Exposure to Advertisements,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 35(February), 72–7.
22.
MoranW. T. (1951b), “A Reply to Heller's Note,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 35(February), 78–9.
23.
NeuD. M. (1961), “Measuring Advertisement Recognition,”Journal of Advertising Research, 1(December), 17–22.
24.
PastoreR. E., and ScheirerC. J. (1974), “Signal Detection Theory: Considerations for General Application,”Psychological Bulletin, 81(December), 945–58.
25.
PetersonW. W., and BirdsallT. G., and FoxW. C. (1954), “The Theory of Signal Detectability,”Transactions IRE Professional Group on Information Theory, 4(September), 171–212.
26.
PollackS., and NormanD. A. (1964), “A Nonparametric Analysis of Recognition Experiments,”Psychonomic Science, 1(May), 125–6.
27.
SchmittleinD. C. (1984), “Assessing Validity and Test-Re-test Reliability for ‘Pick K of N’ Data,”Marketing Science, 3(Winter), 23–40.
28.
SchmittleinD. C., and MorrisonD. G. (1983), “Measuring Miscomprehension for Televised Communication Using True-False Questions,”Journal of Consumer Research, 10(September), 147–56.
29.
SimmonsW. R. (1961), “Controlled Recognition in the Measurement of Advertising Perception,”Public Opinion Quarterly, 25(Fall), 470–71 (abstract).
30.
SinghS. N. (1982), Recognition as a Measure of Learning from Television Commercials, unpublished doctoral dissertation. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms International.
31.
SinghS. N., and RothschildM. L. (1983), “Recognition as a Measure of Learning from Television Commercials,”Journal of Marketing Research, 20(August), 235–48.
32.
StarchD. (1946), Factors in Readership Measurement.New York: Daniel Starch and Staff.
33.
SwetsJ. A., and TannerW. P.Jr., and BirdsallT. G. (1964), “Decision Processes in Perception,” in Signal Detection and Recognition by Human Observers, SwetsJ. A., ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
34.
TulvingE. (1981), “Similarity Relations in Recognition,”Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20(October), 479–96.
35.
Van MeterD., and MiddletonD. (1954), “Modern Statistical Approaches to Reception in Communication Theory,”Transactions IRE Professional Group on Information Theory, 4(September), 119–41.
36.
WallaceW. P. (1980), “False Recognition Produced by Implicit Verbal Responses,”Psychological Bulletin, 88(November), 686–704.
37.
WeaverG. E., and StannyC. J. (1978), “Short Term Retention of Pictorial Stimuli as Accessed by a Probe Recognition Technique,”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4(January), 55–65.
38.
WellsWilliam D. (1961), “The Influence of Yea-Saying Response Style,”Journal of Advertising Research, 1(June), 1–12.
