The LISREL method of computing explained variance for nonrecursive structural equation models is compared with alternative computational procedures. Explained variance estimates produced by LISREL are shown to be influenced by equation disturbance terms in nonrecursive models. The analysis demonstrates the need for caution in interpreting explained variance estimates in models with reciprocal feedback loops and/or errors correlated across equations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AakerDavid A., and BagozziRichard P. (1979), “Unobservable Variables in Structural Equation Models With an Application in Industrial Selling,”Journal of Marketing Research, 16(May), 147–58.
2.
BagozziRichard P. (1977), “Structural Equation Models in Experimental Research,”Journal of Marketing Research, 14(May), 209–26.
3.
FornellClaes (1983), “Issues in the Application of Covariance Structure Analysis: A Comment,”Journal of Consumer Research, 9(March), 443–8.
4.
FornellClaes, and LarckerDavid F. (1981), “Evaluating Structural Equation Models With Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error,”Journal of Marketing Research, 18(February), 39–50.
5.
JöreskogKarl G., and SörbomDag (1983), LISREL VI: Estimation of Linear Structural Equation Systems by the Method of Maximum Likelihood.Chicago: National Educational Resources.
6.
SAS/ETS User's Guide (1980). Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.
7.
TheilH. (1958), Economic Forecasts and Policy.Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.
8.
ZellnerArnold, and TheilH. (1962), “Three-Stage Least Squares: Simultaneous Estimation of Simultaneous Equations,”Econometrica, 30(January), 54–78.
