Excessive interviewing, lack of consideration and abuse of respondents, and the use of marketing research as a sales ploy have been identified as serious threats to marketing research. The authors investigate the extent of these practices, analyze apparent trends over an eight-year period, and make recommendations for marketing research practitioners.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaxterRichard (1964), “An Inquiry Into the Misuse of the Survey Technique by Sales Solicitors,”Public Opinion Quarterly, 28(Spring), 124–34.
2.
BezillaRobert, HaynesJoel B., and ElliottClifford (1976), “Ethics in Marketing Research,”Business Horizons, 19(April), 83–6.
3.
CrawfordC. Merle (1970), “Attitudes of Marketing Executives Towards Ethics in Marketing Research,”Journal of Marketing, 34(April), 46–52.
4.
DayGeorge S. (1975), “The Threats to Marketing Research,”Journal of Marketing Research, 12(November), 462–7.
5.
DayRobert L. (1975), “A Comment on ‘Ethics in Marketing Research’,”Journal of Marketing Research, 12(May), 232–3.
6.
FrankRonald E., MassyWilliam F., and WindYoram (1972), Marketing Segmentation.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
7.
FreyCynthia J., and KinnearThomas C. (1979), “Legal Constraints and Marketing Research: Review and Call to Action,”Journal of Marketing Research, 16(August), 295–302.
8.
HardinGarrett (1968), “The Tragedy of the Commons,”Science, 162(December 13), 1243–8.
9.
HomansGeorge C. (1958), “Social Behavior as Exchange,”American Journal of Sociology, 63(May), 597–606.
10.
HuntH. Keith (1979), “The Ethics of Research in the Consumer Interests: Panel Summary,”Proceedings of the American Council of Consumer Interests Conference, AckermanNorleen M., ed.
11.
KinnearThomas C., and TaylorJames R. (1983), Marketing Research: An Applied Approach, 2nd ed.New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
12.
LawtonLeigh, and ParasuramanA. (1980), “The Impact of the Marketing Concept on New Product Planning,”Journal of Marketing, 44(Winter), 19–25.
13.
LuschRobert F., UdellJon G., and LaczniakGene R. (1976), “The Future of Marketing Strategy,”Business Horizons, 19(December), 65–74.
14.
Marketing Research Standards Committee (1972), Marketing Research Code of Ethics.Chicago: American Marketing Association.
15.
McNamaraCarlton P. (1972), “The Present Status of the Marketing Concept,”Journal of Marketing, 36(January), 50–7.
16.
MyersJames H., and RobertsonThomas S. (1972), “Diversions of Opinion Leadership,”Journal of Marketing Research,9(February), 41–6.
17.
RogersEverett, and Floyd ShoemakerF. (1971), Communication of Innovations, 2nd ed.New York: The Free Press.
18.
SheatsleyPaul B. (1969), “The Harassed Respondent: II. Interviewing Practices,” in Current Controversies in Marketing Research, BogartLeo, ed. Chicago: Markham Publishing Co.
19.
SheetsThomas, and RadlinskiAllen, KohneJames, and BrunnerAllen (1974), “Deceived Respondents: Once Bitten, Twice Shy,”Public Opinion Quarterly, 38(Summer), 261–3.
20.
TyboutAlice M., and ZaltmanGerald (1974), “Ethics in Marketing: Their Practical Relevance,”Journal of Marketing Research, 11(November), 357–68.
21.
U.S. Federal Trade Commission (1962), Federal Trade Commission Decisions 61, The Pulse Inc. Docket C-291.
