A stochastic model of response to rating scales, using the beta distribution, is developed and tested against empirical data. The effect of number of items by number of points on the sampling error of a composite scale value estimator is investigated and quantitatively formulated. An application of this formulation to arrive at optimal combinations of number of points and number of items is described.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ChurchillG. A.Jr. (1979), “A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs,”Journal of Marketing Research, 16(February), 64–73.
2.
CoxE. P. (1980), “The Optimal Number of Response Alternatives for a Scale: A Review,”Journal of Marketing Research, 17(November), 407–22.
3.
DawesR. M. (1972), Fundamentals of Attitude Measurement.New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
4.
GivonM. M. (1980), “Determination of Optimal Sample Sizes in the Beta-Binomial Brand Choice Model,”Journal of Marketing Research, 17(February), 58–62.
5.
GreenP. E., and RaoV. (1970), “Rating Scales and Information Recovery—How Many Scales and Response Categories to Use?”Journal of Marketing, 34(July), 33–9.
6.
HambletonR. K., and CookL. (1977), “Latent Trait Models and Their Use in the Analysis of Educational Test Data,”Journal of Educational Measurement, 14, 75–96.
7.
JacobyJ., and MatellM. S. (1971), “Three-Point Likert Scales are Good Enough,”Journal of Marketing Research, 8(November), 495–500.
8.
JenkinsG. D., and TaberT. D. (1977), “A Monte Carlo Study of Factors Affecting Three Indices and Composite Scale Reliability,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 62(4), 392–8.
9.
KalwaniM. U., and SilkA. J. (1982), “On the Reliability and Predictive Validity of Purchase Intention Measures,”Marketing Science, 1(Summer), 243–86.
10.
KendallM. G., and StuartA. (1967), The Advanced Theory of Statistics, Vol. 11, 2nd ed.New York: Hafner Publishing Company.
11.
LampertS. (1978), “A New Approach to Pre-election Polling,”Public Opinion Quarterly, 42, 544–46.
12.
LehmannD. R., and HulbertJ. (1972), “Are Three-Point Scales Always Good Enough?”Journal of Marketing Research,9(November), 444–6.
13.
LissitzR. W., and GreenS. B. (1975), “Effect of the Number of Scale Points on Reliability: A Monte Carlo Approach,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(1), 10–13.
14.
LordF. L., and NovickM. R. (1968), Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
15.
MassyW. F., and MontgomeryD. B., and MorrisonD. G. (1970), Stochastic Models of Buyer Behavior.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16.
MorrisonD. G. (1979), “Purchase Intentions and Purchase Behavior,”Journal of Marketing, 43, 65–74.
17.
NunnallyJ. C. (1978), Psychometric Theory, 2nd ed.New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
18.
RamsayJ. O. (1973), “The Effect of Number of Categories in Rating Scales on Precision of Estimation of Scale Values,”Psychometrika, 38(December), 513–32.
19.
RamsayJ. O., and CaseB. (1970), “Attitude Measurement and the Linear Model,”Psychological Bulletin, 74, 185–92.
20.
RaoC. R. (1973), Linear Statistical Inference and its Applications, 2nd ed.New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
21.
RothenbergT. J. (1973), Efficient Estimation with A Priori Information.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
22.
SmithP. C., and KendallL. M. (1963), “Retranslation of Expectations: An Approach to the Construction of Unambiguous Anchors for Rating Scales,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 47, 149–55.
23.
StevensS. S. (1966), “On the Operation Known as Judgment,”American Scientist, 54, 385–401.
24.
SymondsP. M. (1924), “On the Loss of Reliability in Ratings Due to Coarseness of the Scale,”Journal of Experimental Psychology, 7, 456–61.
25.
ThurstoneL. L. (1927), “A Law of Comparative Judgment,”Psychological Review, 34, 273–86.
26.
TorgersonW. J. (1958), Theory and Methods of Scaling.New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
27.
WollackS., and GoodaleJ., and WijtingJ., and SmithP. C. (1971), “Development of the Survey of Work Values,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 55(4), 331–8.
28.
YatesF. (1934), “Contingency Tables Involving Small Numbers and the Chi Square Test,”Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Vol. 1, 217–35.
