Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The authors investigate a model for using what is said in a television commercial to predict what viewers recall of it. The psycholinguistically based ad language model (ALM) was applied to analysis of the propositional structure of 19 commercial scripts and 941 associated viewer recall protocols. The protocols came from either day-after telephone interviews by market research agencies or immediate free recall after forced exposure. Stepwise regressions with ALM script measures as predictors accounted for significant portions of the variance in ALM measures of how many ideas viewers would generate when recalling, how much information about execution and product characteristics they would recall, and their use of brand name and descriptive words. ALM script measures also predicted the day-after recall scores available for 16 of the commercials. Linking of the propositional structures of commercials with their recall leads to an improved foundation for use of recall in the evaluation of advertising messages.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alwitt

L. F.

(1983), “What Do People Mean When They Talk About Advertising?”, in Advertising and Consumer Psychology, Percy

, and Woodside

A. G.

, eds. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

Anderson

J. R.

, and Bower

G. H.

(1973), Human Associative Memory. Washington, DC: Winston.

Cirilo

R. K.

, and Foss

D. J.

(1980), “Text Structure and Reading Time for Sentences,” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 96–109.

Cohen

, and Cohen

(1975), Applied Multiple Regression/ Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Haller

T. B.

(1972), “Predicting Recall of TV Commercials,” Journal of Advertising Research, 12, 43–6.

Hintzman

D. L.

(1976), “Repetition and Memory,” in The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Vol. 10, Bower

G. H.

, ed. New York: Academic Press.

Hodock

C. L.

(1976), “Predicting On-Air Recall from Theater Tests,” Journal of Advertising Research, 12, 25–31.

Holbrook

M. B.

, and Lehmann

D. R.

(1980), “Form Versus Content in Predicting Starch Scores,” Journal of Advertising Research, 20, 53–62.

Kintsch

(1974), The Representation of Meaning in Memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

10.

Kintsch

1976, “Memory for Prose,” in The Structure of Human Memory, Cofer

C. N.

, ed. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

11.

Kintsch

, and van Dijk

T. A.

(1978), “Toward a Model of Text Comprehension and Production,” Psychological Review, 85, 363–94.

12.

Kintsch

, and Kozminsky

, and Streby

W. J.

, and McGoon

, and Keenan

J. M.

(1975), “Comprehension and Recall of Text as a Function of Content Variables,” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 196–214.

13.

Leavitt

(1968), “Response Structure: A Determinant of Recall,” Journal of Advertising Research, 8, 3–6.

14.

Leavitt

(1970), “A Multidimensional Set of Rating Scales for Television Commercials,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 54, 427–9.

15.

Manelis

(1980), “Determinants of Processing for a Propositional Structure,” Memory & Cognition, 8(1), 49–57.

16.

Manelis

, and Yekovich

F. R.

(1976), “Repetition of Propositional Arguments in Sentences,” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 301–12.

17.

McIntyre

S. H.

, and Montgomery

D. B.

, and Srinivasan

, and Weitz

B. A.

(1983), “Evaluating the Statistical Significance of Models Developed by Stepwise Regression,” Journal of Marketing Research, 20(February), 1–11.

18.

Neisser

(1982), Memory Observed. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

19.

Norman

D. A.

, and Rumelhart

D. E.

(1975), Explorations in Cognition. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

20.

Plummer

J. T.

(1972), “Evaluating TV Commercial Tests,” Journal of Advertising Research, 12(October), 21–7.

21.

Rundus

(1971), “Analysis of Rehearsal Processes in Free Recall,” Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89, 63–77.

22.

Sawyer

A. G.

(1974), “The Effects of Repetition: Conclusions and Suggestions About Experimental Laboratory Research,” in Buyer/Consumer Information Processing, Hughes

G. D.

, and Ray

M. L.

, eds. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

23.

Thorson

, and Rothschild

M. L.

(1983), “Recognition and Recall of Commercials: Prediction from a Text Comprehension Analysis of Commercial Scripts,” in Advertising and Consumer Psychology, Percy

, and Woodside

A. G.

, eds. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

24.

Vipond

(1989), “Micro- and Macroprocesses in Text Comprehension,” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 276–96.

25.

Young

(1972), “Copy Testing Without Magic Numbers,” Journal of Advertising Research, 12, 3–12.

Viewer Recall of Television Commercials: Prediction from the Propositional Structure of Commercial Scripts

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References