Foot-in-the-door and door-in-the-face are multiple request techniques frequently used to increase behavioral compliance. However, results from experimental research indicate that these techniques may enhance, undermine, or have no effect on compliance. In the authors’ research, the notion of information availability is introduced to help specify when multiple request techniques are likely to be effective. Four experiments are reported that test and support the information availability predictions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllenC. T., and ScheweC. D., and WijkG. (1980), “More on Self-Perception Theory's Foot Technique in the Pre-Call/Mail Survey Setting,”Journal of Marketing Research, 17(November), 498–502.
2.
BernD. (1972), “Self-Perception Theory,” in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 6, BerkowitzL., ed. New York: Academic Press, 1–62.
3.
BowerG. H. (1972), “Mental Imagery and Associative Learning,” in Cognition in Learning and Memory, GreggL., ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
4.
CalderB., and PhillipsL. W., and TyboutA. M. (1981), “Designing Research for Application,”Journal of Consumer Research, 8, 197–207.
5.
CannA., and ShermanS. J., and ElkesR. (1975), “Effects of Initial Request Size and Timing of a Second Request on Compliance: The Foot-in-the-Door and Door-in-the-Face,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 774–82.
6.
CarverC., and ScheierM. (1978), “Self-Focusing Effects of Dispositional Self-Consciousness, Mirror Presence, and Audience Presence,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 324–332.
7.
CialdiniR. B., and AscaniK. (1976), “Test of a Concession Procedure of Inducing Verbal, Behavioral, and Further Compliance with a Request to Give Blood,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 295–300.
8.
CialdiniR. B., and CacioppoJ. T., and BassettR., and MillerJ. A. (1978), “Low-Ball Procedure for Producing Compliance: Commitment then Cost,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 463–76.
9.
CialdiniR. B., and VincentJ. E., and LewisS. K., and CatalanJ., and WheelerD., and DarbyB. L. (1975), “Reciprocal Concessions Procedure for Inducing Compliance: The Door-in-the-Face Technique,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 206–15.
10.
DeJongW. (1979), “An Examination of Self-Perception Mediation of the Foot-in-the-Door Effect,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2221–39.
11.
FreedmanJ., and FraserS. (1966), “Compliance Without Pressure: The Foot-in-the-Door Technique,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 195–202.
12.
HansenR. A., and RobinsonL. M. (1980), “Testing the Effectiveness of Alternative Foot-in-the-Door Manipulations,”Journal of Marketing Research, 17(August), 359–64.
13.
HarrisM. B., and SamerotteG. (1976), “The Effects of Actual and Attempted Theft, Need, and a Previous Favor on Altruism,”Journal of Social Psychology, 99, 193–202.
14.
HigginsE., and RholesW., and JonesC. (1977), “Category Accessibility and Impression Formation,”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 141–54.
15.
MooreB. S., and SherrodD. R., and LiuT. J., and UnderwoodB. (1979), “The Dispositional Shift in Attribution Over Time,”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15, 553–69.
16.
MowenJ. C., and CialdiniR. B. (1980), “On Implementing the Door-in-the-Face Compliance Technique in a Business Context,”Journal of Marketing Research, 17(May), 253–8.
17.
ReingenP., and KernanJ. B. (1979), “More Evidence on Interpersonal Yielding,”Journal of Marketing Research, 16(November), 588–93.
18.
RogersT., and KuiperN., and KirkerW. (1977), “Self-Reference and the Encoding of Personal Information,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 677–88.
19.
ScottC. A. (1976), “The Effects of Trial and Incentives on Repeat Purchase Behavior,”Journal of Marketing Research, 13(August), 263–9.
20.
SeligmanC, and BushM., and KirschK. (1976), “Relationship Between Compliance in the Foot-in-the-Door Paradigm and Size of the First Request,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 517–20.
21.
SnyderM., and CunninghamM. R. (1975), “To Comply or Not Comply: Testing the Self-Perception Explanation of the Foot-in-the-Door Phenomenon,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 64–7.
22.
SwinyardW. R., and RayM. L. (1977), “Advertising-Selling Interactions: An Attribution Theory Experiment,”Journal of Marketing Research, 14(November), 509–16.
23.
ThibautJ., and ReickenH. (1955), “Some Determinants and Consequences of the Perception of Social Causality,”Journal of Personality, 24, 113–33.
24.
TverskyA., and KahnemanD. (1973), “Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability,”Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207–32.
25.
TyboutA. (1978), “Relative Effectiveness of Three Behavioral Influence Strategies as Supplements to Persuasion in a Marketing Context,”Journal of Marketing Research, 15(May), 229–42.
26.
TyboutA., and YalchR. (1980), “The Effect of Experience: A Matter of Salience?”Journal of Consumer Research, 6, 406–13.
27.
WyerR., and Carlstonand (1979), Social Cognition, Inference, and Attribution.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
