Abstract
Judgment-based estimations often are used in marketing decision making and as inputs to decision calculus models. An evaluation of different approaches to integrating individual judgments is performed in the context of a marketing situation where the “true” values being estimated are known. Experts identified by a simple external measure of expertise are found likely to provide better estimates, followed by groups participating in a Delphi process. Experts identified by self-rated confidence and interpersonal group consensus are not found likely to provide better estimates than the average of the initial judgments of the members of a group.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
