A new method for representing attitudinal reactions is developed and related to current information integration approaches. Hypotheses are tested about the effects of expectancy-value measures and affect toward the act on intentions and subsequent behavior. The findings lead to a modification and extension of current attitudinal models and their relation to intentions and behavior.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonNorman H. (1970), “Functional Measurement and Psychophysical Judgment,”Psychological Review, 77(May), 153–70.
2.
AndersonNorman H. (1971), “Integration Theory and Attitude Change,”Psychological Review, 78(March), 171–206.
3.
AndersonNorman H. (1974), “Information Theory: A Brief Survey,” in Contemporary Developments in Mathematical Psychology, Vol. II. KrantzD. H., and AtkinsonR. C., and LuceR. D., and SuppesP., eds. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
4.
BagozziRichard P. (1980), Causal Models in Marketing.New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
5.
BagozziRichard P. (1981a), “An Examination of the Validity of Two Models of Attitude,”Multivariate Behavioral Research, 16(July), 323–59.
6.
BagozziRichard P. (1981b), “Attitudes, Intentions, and Behavior: A Test of Some Key Hypotheses,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(October), 607–27.
7.
BagozziRichard P. (1983), “A Holistic Methodology for Modeling Consumer Response to Innovation,”Operations Research, 31(January–February).
8.
BentlerPeter M., and SpeckartGeorge (1979), “Models of Attitude-Behavior Relations,”Psychological Review, 86, 452–64.
9.
BentlerPeter M., and SpeckartGeorge (1981), “Attitudes ‘Cause’ Behavior: A Structural Equation Analysis,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 226–38.
10.
BerlyneDaniel E. (1960), Conflict, Arousal, and Curiosity.New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
11.
BettmanJames R. (1979), An Information Processing Theory of Consumer Choice.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
12.
BettmanJames R., and CaponNoel, and LutzRichard J. (1975a), “Multiattribute Measurement Models and Multiattribute Attitude Theory: A Test of Construct Validity,”Journal of Consumer Research, 1(March), 1–15.
13.
BettmanJames R., and CaponNoel, and LutzRichard J. (1975b), “Information Processing in Attitude Formation and Change,”Communication Research, 2(July), 267–78.
14.
BettmanJames R., and CaponNoel, and LutzRichard J. (1975c), “Cognitive Algebra in Multi-Attribute Attitude Models,”Journal of Marketing Research, 12(May), 151–64.
15.
BishopY. M. M., and FienbergS. E., and HollandP. W. (1975), Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Theory and Practice.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16.
Carnegie-Mellon University Marketing Seminar (1978), “Attitude Change or Attitude Formation? An Unanswered Question,”Journal of Consumer Research, 4(March), 271–6.
17.
DulanyDon E.Jr. (1961), “Hypotheses and Habits in Verbal ‘Operant Conditioning’,”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63, 251–63.
18.
DulanyDon E.Jr. (1968), “Awareness, Rules, and Propositional Control,” in Verbal Behavior and S-R Behavior Theory, HortonD., and DixonT., eds. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall,340–87.
19.
FishbeinMartin (1967), “A Behavior Theory Approach to the Relations Between Beliefs About an Object and the Attitude Toward the Object,” in Readings in Attitude Theory and Measurement, FishbeinM., ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
20.
FishbeinMartin (1980), “A Theory of Reasoned Action: Some Applications and Implications,” in Nebraska Symposium on Motivation 1979: Beliefs, Attitudes and Values, HoweH. E.Jr., and PageM. M., eds. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press,65–115.
21.
FishbeinMartin, and AjzenIcek (1975), Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
22.
HolbrookMorris B. (1981), “Integrating Compositional and Decompositional Analyses to Represent the Intervening Role of Perceptions in Evaluative Judgments,”Journal of Marketing Research, 18(February), 13–28.
23.
HowardJohn A. (1977), Consumer Behavior: Application of Theory.New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
24.
HowardJohn A., and ShethJagdish N. (1969), The Theory of Buyer Behavior.New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
25.
JöreskogKarl G., and SörbomDag (1978), LISREL TV: Analysis of Linear Structural Relationships by the Method of Maximum Likelihood.Chicago: National Educational Resources.
26.
Kroeber-RielWerner (1979), “Activation Research: Psycho-biological Approaches in Consumer Research,”Journal of Consumer Research, 5(March), 240–50.
27.
Kroeber-RielWerner (1980), Konsumenten-Verhalten.München, West Germany: Verlag Franz Vahlen.
28.
LordF. M., and NovickM. E. (1968), Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
29.
LutzRichard J. (1975), “Changing Brand Attitudes Through Modification of Cognitive Structure,”Journal of Consumer Research, 1(March), 49–59.
30.
LutzRichard J. (1977), “An Experimental Investigation of Causal Relations Among Cognitions, Affect, and Behavioral Intention,”Journal of Consumer Research, 3(March), 197–208.
31.
LutzRichard J. (1978), “Rejoinder,”Journal of Consumer Research, 4(March), 276–8.
32.
LynchJohn G. (1979), “Why Additive Utility Models Fail as Descriptions of Choice Behavior,”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15, 397–417.
33.
MazisMichael B., AhtolaOlli T., and Eugene KlippelR. (1975), “A Comparison of Four Multi-Attribute Models in the Prediction of Consumer Attitudes,”Journal of Consumer Research, 2(June), 38–52.
34.
McGuireWilliam J. (1968), “Theory of the Structure of Human Thought,” in Theories of Cognitive Consistency, AbelsonR. P., and AronsonE., and McGuireW. J., and NewcombT. M., and RosenbergM. J., and TannenbaumP. H., eds. Chicago: Rand McNally,140–62.
35.
McNemarQ. (1969), Psychological Statistics, 4th ed.New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
36.
OlssonV. (1979), “On the Robustness of Factor Analysis Against Crude Classifications of the Observations,”Multivariate Behavioral Research, 14, 485–500.
37.
ReibsteinDavid J., LovelockChristopher H., and DeRicardo, and DobsonP. (1980), “The Direction of Causality Between Perceptions, Affect, and Behavior: An Application to Travel Behavior,”Journal of Consumer Research, 6(March), 370–6.
38.
RosenbergMilton J. (1956), “Cognitive Structure and Attitudinal Affect,”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 53, 367–72.
39.
RyanMichael J., and BonfieldE. H. (1980), “Fishbein's Intentions Model: A Test of External and Pragmatic Validity,”Journal of Marketing, 44(Spring), 82–95.
40.
SchmidtFrank L. (1973), “Implications of a Measurement Problem for Expectancy-Theory Research,”Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 10(October), 243–51.
41.
ShanteauJames C. (1974), “Component Processes in Risky Decision-Making,”Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103(October), 680–91.
42.
TriandisHarry C. (1977), Interpersonal Behavior.Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
43.
TriandisHarry C. (1980), “Values, Attitudes, and Interpersonal Behavior,” in Nebraska Symposium on Motivation 1979: Beliefs, Attitudes, and Values, HoweH. E.Jr., and PageM. M., eds. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press,195–259.
44.
TroutmanC. Michael, and ShanteauJames (1976), “Do Consumers Evaluate Products by Adding or Averaging Attribute Information,”Journal of Consumer Research, 3(September), 101–6.
45.
WyerR. S., and GoldbergL. (1970), “A Probabilistic Analysis of the Relationship Among Beliefs and Attitudes,”Psychological Review, 77(March), 100–20.
46.
YamagishiToshio, and HillCharles T. (1981), “Adding Versus Averaging Models Revised: A Test of a Path-Analytic Integration Model,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 13–25.
47.
ZajoncR. B. (1968), “Attitudinal Effects of Mere Exposure,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Monograph, 9(2, Part 2), 1–28.
48.
ZajoncR. B. (1980), “Feeling and Thinking: Preferences Need No Inferences,”American Psychologist, 35(February), 151–75.
