Lack of unidimensionality in structural equation models most often represents misspecification. The authors review the necessary conditions for unidimensional measurement of constructs. Two methods which assist the researcher in measurement model respecification, multiple-groups analysis and similarity coefficients, are presented and an example illustrating the use of these methods is given.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AakerD. A., and BagozziR. P. (1979), “Unobservable Variables in Structural Equation Models with an Application in Industrial Selling,”Journal of Marketing Research, 16(May), 147–58.
2.
BagozziR. P. (1977), “Structural Equation Models in Experimental Research,”Journal of Marketing Research, 14(May), 209–26.
3.
BagozziR. P. (1980), Causal Models in Marketing.New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
4.
BagozziR. P. (1981), “Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: A Comment,”Journal of Marketing Research, 18(August), 375–81.
5.
BentlerP. M., and BonettD. G. (1980), “Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures,”Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606.
6.
BockR. D., and BargmannR. E. (1966), “Analysis of Covariance Structures,”Psychometrika, 31, 507–34.
7.
BrowneM. W. (1974), “Generalized Least Squares Estimators in the Analysis of Covariance Structures,”South African Statistical Journal, 8, 1–24.
8.
BurtC. (1909), “Experimental Tests of General Intelligence,”British Journal of Psychology, 3, 94–177.
9.
BurtC. (1938), “Factor Analysis by Sub-Matrices,”The Journal of Psychology, 6, 339–75.
10.
BurtR. S. (1973), “Confirmatory Factor-Analysis Structures and the Theory Construction Process,”Sociological Methods & Research, 2, 131–87.
11.
BurtR. S. (1976), “Interpretational Confounding of Unobserved Variables in Structural Equation Models,”Sociological Methods & Research, 5(August), 3–52.
12.
ChristieR., and GeisF. C. (1970), Studies in Machiavellianism.New York: Academic Press.
13.
CostnerH. L., and SchoenbergR. (1973), “Diagnosing Indicator Ills in Multiple Indicator Models,” in Structural Equation Models in the Social Sciences, GoldbergerA. S., and DuncanO. D., eds. New York: Seminar Press,167–99.
14.
CronbachL. J. (1947), “Test ‘Reliability’: Its Meaning and Determination,”Psychometrika, 12(1), 1–16.
15.
CronbachL. J. (1951), “Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests,”Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334.
16.
FornellC., and LarkerD. F. (1981), “Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics,”Journal of Marketing Research, 18(August), 382–8.
17.
GerbingD. W. (1979), “Parameter Estimation and Model Construction for Recursive Models with Unidimensional Measurement,” unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Psychology, Michigan State University.
18.
GerbingD. W., and HunterJ. E. (1980), “The Return to Multiple Groups: Analysis and Critique of Confirmatory Factor Analysis with LISREL,” paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southwestern Psychological Association, Oklahoma City, April.
19.
GuttmanL. (1952), “Multiple Group Methods for Common-Factor Analysis: Their Basis, Computation, and Interpretation,”Psychometrika, 17, 209–22.
20.
HarmanH. H. (1954), “The Square Root Method and Multiple Group Methods of Factor Analysis,”Psychometrika, 19(March), 39–55.
21.
HarmanH. H. (1976), Modern Factor Analysis.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22.
HartB., and SpearmanC. (1913), “General Ability, Its Existence and Nature,”British Journal of Psychology, 5, 51–84.
23.
HeiseD. R. (1975), Causal Analysis.New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
24.
HeiseD. R., and BohrnstedtG. W. (1970), “Validity, Invalidity, and Reliability,” in Sociological Methodology, BorgattaE. F., and BohrnstedtG. W., eds. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass,104–29.
25.
HolzingerK. J. (1944), “A Simple Method of Factor Analysis,”Psychometrika, 9(4), 257–62.
26.
HunterJ. E. (1973), “Methods of Reordering the Correlation Matrix to Facilitate Visual Inspection and Preliminary Cluster Analysis,”Journal of Educational Measurement, 10(1), 51–61.
27.
HunterJ. E., and CohenS. H. (1969), “PACKAGE: A System of Computer Routines for the Analysis of Correlational Data,”Educational and Psychological Measurement, 29, 697–700.
28.
HunterJ. E., and GerbingD. W. (1982), “Unidimensional Measurement, Second Order Factor Analysis and Causal Models,” in Research in Organizational Behavior, StawB. M., and CummingsL. L., eds. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, Volume IV.
29.
HunterJ. E., GerbingD. W., and BosterF. J. (in press), “Machiavellian Beliefs and Personality: The Construct Invalidity of the Machiavellianism Dimension,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
30.
HunterJ. E., GerbingD. W., and CohenS. H., and NicolT. S. (1980), “PACKAGE 1980: A System of FORTRAN Routines for the Analysis of Correlational Data,” prepared with the support of Academic Computing Services, Baylor University, Waco, Texas.
31.
JöreskogK. G. (1966), “Testing a Simple Structure Hypothesis in Factor Analysis,”Psychometrika, 31, 165–78.
32.
JöreskogK. G. (1967), “Some Contributions to Maximum Likelihood Factor Analysis,”Psychometrika, 32(December), 443–82.
33.
JöreskogK. G. (1969), “A General Approach to Confirmatory Maximum Likelihood Factor Analysis,”Psychometrika, 34(June), 183–202.
34.
JöreskogK. G. (1970), “A General Method for Analysis of Covariance Structures,”Biometrika, 57(2), 239–51.
35.
JöreskogK. G. (1978), “Structural Analysis of Covariance and Correlation Matrices,”Psychometrika, 43(December), 443–77.
36.
JöreskogK. G., and SörbomD. (1978), LISREL TV: Analysis of Linear Structural Relationships by the Method of Maximum Likelihood.Chicago: International Educational Services.
37.
LawleyD. N. (1943), “The Application of the Maximum Likelihood Method to Factor Analysis,”British Journal of Psychology, 33, 172–5.
38.
LawleyD. N., and MaxwellA. E. (1963), Factor Analysis as a Statistical Method.London: Butterworth & Co. (Publishers) Ltd.
39.
LawleyD. N., and MaxwellA. E. (1971), Factor Analysis as a Statistical Method, 2nd ed.London: Butterworth & Co. (Publishers) Ltd.
40.
SarisW. E., and de PijperW. M., and ZegwaartP. (1978), “Detection of Specification Errors in Linear Structural Equation Models,” in Sociological Methodology, SchuessterK. E., ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
41.
SmithK. W. (1974), “On Estimating the Reliability of Composite Indices Through Factor Analysis,”Sociological Methods & Research, 2(May), 485–510.
42.
SörbomD. (1975), “Detection of Correlated Errors in Longitudinal Data,”British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 28, 138–51.
43.
SörbomD., and JöreskogK. G. (1976), COFAMM: Confirmatory Factor Analysis with Model Modification.User's Guide. Chicago: International Educational Services.
44.
SpearmanC. (1904), “‘General Intelligence,’ Objectively Determined and Measured,”American Journal of Psychology, 15, 259–92.
45.
SpearmanC. (1907), “Demonstration of Formulae for True Measurement of Correlation,”American Journal of Psychology, 18, 161–9.
46.
SpearmanC. (1914), “Theory of Two Factors,”Psychological Review, 21, 105–15.
47.
SpearmanC., and HolzingerK. (1924), “The Sampling Error in the Theory of Two Factors,”British Journal of Psychology, 15, 17–9.
48.
ThurstoneL. L. (1931), “Multiple Factor Analysis,”Psychological Review, 38, 406–27.
49.
TryonR. C. (1939), Cluster Analysis.Ann Arbor, MI: Edwards Brothers, Inc.
50.
TryonR. C., and BaileyD. E. (1970), Cluster Analysis.New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
51.
TuckerL. R. (1940), “The Role of Correlated Factors in Factor Analysis,”Psychometrika, 5(June), 141–52.
52.
WrightS. (1960), “Path Coefficients and Path Regressions: Alternative or Complementary Concepts,”Biometrics, 16(June), 189–202.
