Monetary Incentives versus Promised Contribution to Charity: New Evidence on Mail Survey Response

Abstract

The relative efficacy of two types of incentives for producing responses to a mail survey was investigated. Personal cash payments of varying amounts enclosed with the questionnaire were compared with promises of a contribution to a charity of the respondent's choice and with a no-incentive control. Contrary to a previous research finding reported in the literature, the charity incentive did not produce a significantly greater return rate than was obtained with the no-incentive control. Personal cash incentives produced a significantly greater response rate than either the no-incentive control condition or the charity-incentive condition. Results of the study are interpreted as consistent with a cognitive dissonance theory of mail questionnaire response.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Armstrong

J. S.

(1975), “Monetary Incentives in Mail Surveys,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 39(Spring), 111–16.

Blumberg

H. H.

, and Fuller

, and Hare

A. P.

(1974), “Response Rates in Postal Surveys,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 38(Spring), 113–23.

Champion

D. J.

, and Sear

A. M.

(1963), “Questionnaire Response Rate: A Methodological Analysis,” Social Forces, 47(March), 335–9.

Edgington

E. S.

(1966), “Statistical Inference and Nonrandom Samples,” Psychological Bulletin, 66, 485–7.

Erdos

P. L.

(1970), Professional Mail Surveys. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.

Furse

D. H.

, and Stewart

D. W.

(1981a), “Toward a Cognitive Dissonance Theory of Mail Questionnaire Response,” Working Paper 81–102 (January), Owen Graduate School of Management, Vanderbilt University.

Furse

D. H.

, and Stewart

D. W.

(1981b), “Cognitive Dissonance and Response to Mail Surveys,” Working Paper No. 81–119 (September), Owen Graduate School of Management, Vanderbilt University.

Furse

D. H.

, and Stewart

D. W.

, and Rados

(1981) “Effects of Foot-in-the-Door, Cash Incentives, and Follow-ups on Survey Response,” Journal of Marketing Research, 18(November), 473–8.

Gelb

(1975), “Incentives to Increase Survey Returns: Social Class Considerations,” Journal of Marketing Research, 12(February), 107–9.

10.

Hackler

, and Bourgette

(1973), “Dollars, Dissonance, and Survey Returns,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(Summer), 276–81.

11.

Houston

M. J.

, and Ford

N. M.

(1976), “Broadening the Scope of Methodological Research on Mail Surveys,” Journal of Marketing Research, 13(November), 397–403.

12.

Houston

M. J.

, and Nevin

J. R.

(1977), “The Effects of Source and Appeal on Mail Survey Response Patterns,” Journal of Marketing Research, 14(August), 374–8.

13.

Kanuk

, and Berenson

(1975), “Mail Surveys and Response Rates: A Literature Review,” Journal of Marketing Research, 12(November), 440–53.

14.

Krebs

D. L.

(1970), “Altrusim—An Examination of the Concept and a Review of the Literature,” Psychological Bulletin, 73, 258–302.

15.

Linsky

A. S.

(1975), “Stimulating Responses to Mailed Questionnaires: A Review,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 39(Spring), 82–101.

16.

Marascuilo

L. A.

(1971), Statistical Methods for Behavioral Science Research. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.

17.

McCauley

J. R.

, and Berkowitz

eds. (1970), Altruism and Helping Behavior. New York: Academic Press.

18.

Middlebrook

P. N.

(1980), Social Psychology and Modern Life. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

19.

Robertson

D. H.

, and Bellenger

D. N.

(1978), “A New Method of Increasing Mail Survey Responses: Contributions to Charity,” Journal of Marketing Research, 15(November), 632–3.

20.

Whitmore

W. J.

(1976), “Mail Survey Premiums and Response Bias,” Journal of Marketing Research, 13(February), 46–50.

21.

Wicklund

R. A.

, and Brehm

J. W.

(1976), Perspectives on Cognitive Dissonance. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

22.

Wortruba

T. R.

(1966), “Monetary Inducements and Mail Questionnaire Response,” Journal of Marketing Research, 3(November), 393–400.