The persuasive impact of source credibility is examined in two situations. A highly credible source was more effective than a moderately credible source when the communication recommended buying a product, an advocacy which message recipients viewed unfavorably. The moderately credible source was more persuasive when the message advocated leasing the product, a position subjects generally supported. These findings are interpreted in terms of cognitive response theory. Practical implications of the research are suggested.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BensonT. (1978), “Microcomputers in the Home,”Interface Age, 3(8), 71.
2.
BerloD., and LemertJ., and MertzR. (1969–70), “Dimensions for Evaluating the Acceptability of Message Sources,”Public Opinion Quarterly, 33(4), 563–76.
3.
BerryL., and MaricleK. (1973), “Consumption Without Ownership: Marketing Opportunity for Today and Tomorrow,”MSU Business Topics, 21, 33–41.
4.
BockD., and SaineT. (1975), “The Impact of Source Credibility, Attitude Valence, and Task Sensitization on Trait Errors in Speech Evaluation,”Speech Monographs, 37, 342–58.
5.
CronbachL. (1951), “Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests,”Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.
6.
DeanR., and AustinJ., and WattsW. (1971), “Forewarning Effects in Persuasion: Field and Classroom Experiments,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18(2), 210–21.
7.
DholakiaR., and SternthalB. (1977), “Highly Credible Sources: Persuasive Facilitators or Persuasive Liabilities?”,Journal of Consumer Research, 3(4), 223–32.
8.
EdellJ., and MitchellA. (1978), “An Information Processing Approach to Cognitive Responses,” in Research Frontiers in Marketing, JainS., ed. Chicago: American Marketing Association,178–83.
9.
GreenwaldA. (1968), “Cognitive Learning, Cognitive Response to Persuasion, and Attitude Change,” in Psychological Foundations of Attitudes, GreenwaldA., and BrockT., and OstromT., eds. New York: Academic Press,147–70.
10.
HovlandC, and JanisI., and KelleyH. (1953), Communication and Persuasion.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
11.
KeppelG. (1973), Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
12.
McGinniesE. (1973), “Initial Attitude, Source Credibility, and Involvement as Factors in Persuasion,”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9, 285–96.
13.
ObenbergerR., and BrownS. (1976), “A Marketing Alternative: Consumer Leasing and Renting,”Business Horizons, 19(5), 82–6.
14.
SchwartzD. A. (1979), “Microcomputers Take Aim on Small Business Clients,”Journal of Accountancy, 148(6), 57–62.
15.
SternthalB., and DholakiaR., and LeavittC. (1978), “The Persuasive Effects of Source Credibility: Tests of Cognitive Response,”Journal of Consumer Research, 4(4), 252–60.
16.
WrightP. (1980), “Message-Evoked Thoughts: Persuasion Research Using Thought Verbalizations,”Journal of Consumer Research,1(2), 151–75.
17.
WrightP., and WeitzB. (1977), “Time Horizon Effects on Product Evaluation Strategies,”Journal of Marketing Research, 14(November), 429–43.
