The authors evaluate several factors affecting the attention given to or “use” of specific market research information by marketing managers. They apply path analysis to test a model of research use involving 11 variables. Factors found to be especially important are organizational structure, technical quality, surprise, actionability, and researcher-manager interaction. The topic and findings of the study relate to a central activity of the marketing profession—the application of knowledge—and to the use of an important product—market research. Both the knowledge system of marketing and the behavior of managers as consumers of research products have been relatively neglected.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbelsonR. P. (1959), “Modes of Resolution of Belief Dilemmas,”Journal of Conflict Resolution, 3, 343–52.
2.
AdlerL., and MayerC. S. (1977), Managing the Market Research Function, AMA Monograph No. 5. Chicago: American Marketing Association.
3.
AikenM., and HageJ. (1968), “Organizational Independence and Intra-Organizational Structure,”American Sociological Review, 33, 912–30.
4.
AlbaumA., and TullD. S., and HansonJ., and LineweaverM. (1978), “The Use by Business Firms of Expected Value of Information in Marketing Research Decisions,”Proceedings of the Western AIDS Conference.Chicago: American Institute of Decision Sciences.
5.
AlwinD. F., and HauserR. M. (1975), “The Decomposition of Effects in Path Analysis,”American Sociological Review, 40(February), 37–47.
6.
ArgyrisC., and SchonD. A. (1978), Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective.Reading, MA: Addision-Wesley.
7.
AronsonE. (1969), “Dissonance Theory: Progress and Problems,” in Theories of Cognitive Consistency: A Sourcebook, AbelsonR. P., and AronsonE., and McGuireW. J., and NewcombT. N., and RosenbergM. J., and TannenbaumP., eds. New York: Rand McNally.
8.
AsherH. B. (1976), Causal Modeling.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
9.
BackerThomas E., and GlaserEdward M. eds. (1979), Portraits of 17 Outstanding Organizational Consultants, Human Interaction Research Institute.
10.
BarabbaV. (1978), “Knowledge Utilization: The Difference Between the Public and Private Sector,” paper presented at the Conference on Federal Information Sources, Ottawa, Canada, December 4–5.
11.
BellengerD. N. (1979), “The Marketing Manager's View of Marketing Research,”Business Horizons, 22(June), 59–65.
12.
BeyerJanice M., and TriceHarrison M. (1978), Implementing Change: Alcoholism Policies in Work Organizations.New York: The Free Press.
13.
BlalockH. M.Jr. (1963), “Correlated Independent Variables: The Problem of Multicollinearity,”American Journal of Sociology, 42, 233–7.
14.
BlalockH. M.Jr. (1964), Causal Inferences in Nonexperimental Research.Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
15.
BlalockH. M.Jr. (1967), “Causal Inference, Closed Populations, and Measures of Association,”American Political Science Review, 61(March), 130–6.
16.
BlauP. M., and SchoenherrR. A. (1971), The Structure of Organization.New York: Basic Books.
17.
BonomaThomas V., and ZaltmanGerald, and JohnstonWesley J. (1977), Industrial Buying Behavior.Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.
18.
BrownL. D. (1972), “Research Action, Organizational Feedback, Understanding, and Change,”Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 8(November-December), 697–711.
19.
CampbellDonald T. (1975), “Degrees of Freedom and the Case Study,”Comparative Political Studies, 8(July), 178–93.
20.
CaplanN., and MorrisonA., and StambaughR. J. (1975), The Use of Social Science Knowledge in Public Policy Decisions at the National Level.Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
21.
ChernsA. (1979), Using the Social Sciences.Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
22.
ChildJ. (1972), “Organizational Structure and Strategies of Control: A Replication of the Aston Study,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 19, 163–77.
23.
CookThomas D., and CampbellDonald T. (1979), Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings.Chicago: Rand McNally College Publishing Co.
24.
CronbachL. J. (1951), “Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests,”Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.
25.
DanzigerJ. N. (1979), “Automated Information in Local Government,”American Behavioral Scientist, 22(January-February), 363–92.
26.
DeshpandeR. (1979a), “The Use, Nonuse, and Abuse of Social Science Knowledge,”Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 1(September), 164–76.
27.
DeshpandeR. (1976b), “Toward a Theoretical Model of the Utilization of Marketing Research Informaton for Consumer Product Strategy Decisions,” Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.
28.
DeshpandeR. (1981), “Action and Enlightenment Functions of Research: Comparing Private- and Public-Sector Perspectives,”Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 2(March), 317–30.
29.
DeshpandeR., and JeffriesS. (1981), “Attributes Affecting the Use of Market Research in Decision Making: An Empirical Investigation,” in Proceedings of the AMA Educators’ Conference, BernhardtK., eds. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 1–4.
30.
DeshpandeR., and ZaltmanG. (1981), “The Characteristics of Knowledge Use: Corporate and Public Policy Insights,” in Government Marketing: Theory and Practice, MokwaM., and PermutS., eds. New York: Praeger Publishers, 270–278.
31.
DuncanR. (1972), “Characteristics of Organizational Environments and Perceived Environmental Uncertainty,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 17:3, 313–27.
32.
DunnWilliam (1980), “The Two Community Metaphor and Models of Knowledge Utilization: An Exploratory Case Study,”Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 1:4, 575–36.
33.
DunnWilliam (1982), “Reforms as Arguments,” in The Political Realization of Social Science Knowledge and Research: Toward New Scenarios, KnorrK., and StrasserH., and HolznerB., eds. Frankfurt: Physica Verlag.
34.
DyerR. F., and ShimpT. A. (1977), “Enhancing the Role of Marketing Research in Public Policy Decision Making,”Journal of Marketing, 41(January), 63–7.
35.
ErnstL. A. (1976), “703 Reasons Why Creative People Don't Trust Research,”Advertising Age, February 10, 35–6.
36.
FestingerL. (1957), A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance.New York: Harper and Row.
37.
GreenbergB. A., and GoldstuckerJ. L., and BellengerD. N. (1977), “What Techniques Are Used by Marketing Researchers in Business,”Journal of Marketing, 41(April) 62–8.
38.
HageJ. (1980), Theories of Organizations.New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
39.
HageJ., and AikenM. (1967), “Program Change and Organizational Properties, A Comparative Analysis,”American Journal of Sociology, 72, 503–19.
40.
HageJ., and AikenM. (1969), “Routine Technology, Social Structure and Organizational Goals,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 14, 366–76.
41.
HageJ., and AikenM. (1970), Social Change in Complex Organizations.New York: Random House.
42.
HallR. (1972), Organizations, Structure and Process.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
43.
HallR., and HaasE. F., and JohnsonN. F. (1967), “Organizational Size, Complexity and Formalization,”American Sociological Review, 32, 903–11.
44.
HardinD. K. (1973), “Marketing Research and Productivity,” in Proceedings of the AMA Educators’ Conference, GreerT. V., ed. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 169–171.
45.
HavelockR. G., and GuskinA., and FrohmanM., and HavelockM., and HillM., and HuberJ. (1971), Planning for Innovations Through Dissemination and Utilization of Knowledge.Ann Arbor, MI: CRUSK/ISR.
46.
HiningsC. R., and LeeG. (1971), “Dimensions of Organization Structure and Their Context: A Replication,”Sociology, 5, 83–93.
47.
HolbertN. A. (1974), “How Managers See Marketing Research,”Journal of Advertising Research, 14(December), 41–6.
48.
HolznerB., and MarxJ. (1979), Knowledge Application: The Knowledge System in Society.Boston: MA: Allyn and Bacon.
49.
HonomichlJ. (1981), “The Nation's Biggest Research Companies Hike Revenue 17%,”Advertising Age, May 18, 3.
50.
HousePeter W., and JonesDavid W. (1978), Getting It Off the Shelf: A Methodology for Implementing Federal Research.Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
51.
KassarjianH. H., and CohenJ. B., (1965), “Cognitive Dissonance and Consumer Behavior: Reactions to the Surgeon General's Report on Smoking and Health,”California Management Review, 8(Fall), 55–64.
52.
KochenM. ed. (1975), Information for Action: From Knowledge to Wisdom.New York: Academic Press.
53.
KoverA. J. (1976), “Careers and Noncommunication: The Case of Academic and Applied Marketing Research,”Journal of Marketing Research, 13(November), 339–44.
54.
KrumJ. R. (1978), “B for Marketing Research Departments,”Journal of Marketing, 42(October), 8–12.
55.
KunstlerD. A. (1975), cited in Marketing News (March), 12.
56.
LarsenJudith K. (1980), “Knowledge Utilization: What Is It,”Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 1:3, 421–42.
57.
LarsenJudith K. (1982), “The Nature of Information Utilization in Large Organizations,” in The Political Realization of Social Science Knowledge and Research: Toward New Scenarios, KnorrK., and StrasserH., and HolznerB., eds. Frankfurt: Physica Verlag.
58.
LazarsfeldP. F., and SewellW. H., and WilenskyH. L. eds. (1967), The Uses of Sociology.New York: Basic Books, Inc.
59.
LazerwitzB. (1973), “Religious Identification and Its Ethnic Correlates: A Multivariate Model,”Social Forces, 52(December), 204–20.
60.
LindblomC. E., and CohenD. K. (1979), Usable Knowledge: Social Science and Social Problem Solving.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
61.
LingwoodD. A. (1979), “Producing Usable Research,”American Behavioral Scientist, 22(January-February), 339–62.
62.
MitroffI. I., and KilmannR. H., and BarabbaV. P. (1979), “Management Information Versus Misinformation Systems,” in Management Principles for Nonprofit Agencies and Organizations, ZaltmanG., ed. New York: Amacom, 401–29.
63.
MochM. K., and MorseE. V. (1977), “Size, Centralization and Organization Adoption of Innovations,”American Sociological Review, 42(October), 716–25.
64.
MyersJ. G., and GreyserS. A., and MassyW. F. (1979), “The Effectiveness of Marketing's ‘R&D’ For Marketing Management,”Journal of Marketing, 43(January), 17–29.
65.
NewmanJ. A. (1962), “Put Research Into Marketing Decisions,”Harvard Business Review, 40:2, 105–12.
66.
NunnallyJ. C. (1967), Psychometric Theory.New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
67.
OrlansHarold (1973), Contracting for Knowledge.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
68.
PayneR., and PughD. S. (1976), “Organizational Structure and Climate,” in Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, DunnetteM. D., ed. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1125–37.
69.
PermutS. (1977), “The European View of Marketing Research,”Columbia Journal of World Business (Fall), 94–104.
70.
PughD. S., and HicksonD. J., and HiningsC. R., and TurnerC. (1968), “Dimensions of Organization Structure,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 13, 65–105.
71.
ReinM. (1976), Social Science and Public Policy.New York: Penguin Books.
72.
RichR. (1977), “Uses of Social Science Information by Federal Bureaucrats: Knowledge for Action vs. Knowledge for Understanding,” in Using Social Research in Public Policy Making, WeissC., ed. Lexington, MA: D.C. Health.
73.
RichR. (1979), The Power of Social Science Information and Public Policy Making.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
74.
RothmanJ. (1980), Using Research in Organizations.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
75.
SatheV. (1978), “Institutional Versus Questionnaire Measures of Organizational Structure,”Academy of Management Journal, 21, 227–38.
76.
SeidlerJ. (1974), “On Using Informants: A Technique for Collecting Quantitative Data and Collecting Measurement Error in Organizational Analysis,”American Sociological Review, 39, 816–31.
77.
SelltizC., and WrightsmanL. S., and CookS. W. (1976), Research Methods in Social Relations.New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
78.
SimonH. A. (1957), “Spurious Correlation: A Causal Interpretation,”Models of Man.New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 37–49.
79.
WeissC. H. (1980), “Knowledge Creep and Decision Accretion,”Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 1(March), 381–404.
80.
WeissC. H. (1982), “Three Terms in Search of Reconceptualization: Knowledge, Utilization, and Decisionmaking,” in The Political Realization of Social Science Knowledge and Research: Toward New Scenarios, KnorrK., and StrasserH., and HolznerB., eds. Frankfurt: Physica Verlag.
81.
WeissC. H., and BucuvalasM. J. (1977), “The Challenge of Social Research to Decision Making,” in Using Social Research in Public Policy Making, WeissC. H., ed. Lexington, MA: D.C. Health, 213–32.
82.
WeissC. H., and BucuvalasM. J. (1980), “Truth Tests and Utility Tests,”American Sociological Review, 45(April), 303–12.
83.
ZaltmanG. (1979), “Knowledge Utilization as Planned Social Change,”Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 1(September), 82–105.
84.
ZaltmanG. (1982), “Constructing Knowledge Use,” in The Political Realization of Social Science Knowledge and Research: Toward New Scenarios, KnorrK., and StrasserH., and HolznerB., eds. Frankfurt: Physica Verlag.
85.
ZaltmanG., and DuncanR., (1977), Strategies for Planned Change.New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
86.
ZaltmanG., and DuncanR., and Holbek (1973), Innovations and Organizations.New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
87.
ZaltmanG., and PinsonC., and AngelmarR. (1973), Metatheory and Consumer Research.Hindsdale, IL: Dryden Press.
88.
ZimanJ. (1978), Reliable Knowledge: An Exploration of the Grounds for Belief in Science.Cambridge University Press.
89.
ZmudR. D. (1978), “An Empirical Investigation of the Dimensionality of the Concept of Information,”Decision Sciences, 9, 187–95.
