Assumptions about focus group interviewing were tested. Individual interviews generated more ideas than focus groups, eight-member groups generated significantly more ideas than four-member groups, no differences were found between focus groups and unmoderated discussion groups, and the effect of acquaintanceship was not clearly determined.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BouchardThomas J.Jr., and BarsalouxJean, and DraudenGail (1974), “Brainstorming Procedure, Group Size, and Sex as Determinants of the Problem-Solving Effectiveness of Groups and Individuals,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 59(April), 135–8.
2.
BouchardThomas J., and HareMelana (1970), “Size, Performance, and Potential in Brainstorming Groups,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 54(February), 51–5.
3.
BrownBert R. (1970), “Face-Saving Following Experimentally Induced Embarrassment,”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 6(July), 255–71.
4.
BrownBert R., and GarlandHoward (1971), “The Effects of Incompetency, Audience Acquaintanceship and Anticipated Evaluative Feedback on Face-Saving Behavior,”Journal of Experimental Group Psychology, 7, 490–502.
5.
CalderBobby J. (1977), “Focus Groups and the Nature of Qualitative Marketing Research,”Journal of Marketing Research, 14(August), 353–64.
6.
CampbellJohn P. (1968), “Individual Versus Group Problem Solving in an Industrial Sample,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 52(June), 205–10.
7.
CohenJacob (1969), Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences.New York: Academic Press Inc., 51.
8.
DunnetteMarvin D., and CampbellJohn, and JaastadKay (1963), “The Effect of Group Participation on Brainstorming Effectiveness for Two Industrial Samples,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 47(January), 30–7.
9.
EdwardsAllen (1960), Experimental Design in Psychological Research.New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston, 104–16.
10.
FernEdward F. (in press), “Why Do Focus Groups Work: A Review and Integration of Small Group Process Theories,” in Advances in Consumer Research, MitchellAndrew, ed. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
11.
GarlandHoward, and BrownBert R. (1972), “Face-Saving as Affected by Subjects’ Sex, Audiences’ Sex, and Audience Expertise,”Sociometry, 35(June), 280–9.
12.
GoldmanAlfred E. (1962), “The Group Depth Interview,”Journal of Marketing, 26(July), 61–8.
13.
GreenbergBarnett A., GoldstuckerJac L., and BellengerDanny N. (1977), “What Techniques Are Used by Marketing Researchers in Business,”Journal of Marketing, 41(April), 61–8.
14.
HessJohn M. (1968), “Group Interviewing,” in 1968 ACR Fall Conference Proceedings, KingRobert L., ed. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 193–6.
15.
HolstiO. R. (1969), Content Analysis for Social Sciences and Humanities.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
16.
HorowitzMilton W., and NewmanJohn B. (1964), “Spoken and Written Expression: An Experimental Analysis,”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 68(December), 640–7.
17.
KirkRoger E. (1968), Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences.Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
18.
LatanéBibb, and NidaSteve (1980), “Social Impact Theory and Group Influence: A Social Engineering Perspective,” in Psychology of Group Influence, PaulusP. B., ed. Hinsdale, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.
19.
MertonRobert K., and FiskeMarjorie, and KendallPatricia (1956), “The Group Interview,” in The Focused Interview.Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
20.
OsbornAlex F. (1953), Applied Imagination.New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 297–308.
21.
PayneMelanie S. (1976), “Preparing for Group Interview,” in Advances in Consumer Research, AndersonBeverlee, ed. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 434–6.
22.
PoserErnest G. (1966), “The Effect of Therapist's Training on Group Therapeutic Outcome,”Journal of Consulting Psychology, 30, 283–9.
23.
SampsonPeter (1972), “Qualitative Research and Motivation Research,” in Consumer Market Research Handbook, WorchesterRobert M., ed. Maindenhead, England: McGraw-Hill Book Co. (U.K.), Ltd., 7–27.
24.
SlaterP. E. (1958), “Contrasting Correlates of Group Size,”Sociometry, 21(March), 129–39.
25.
SmithJoan Macfarlane (1972), “Group Discussions,” in Interviewing in Market and Social Research.London and Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
26.
TaylorDonald W., BerryPaul C., and BlockClifford H. (1958), “Does Group Participation, When Using Brain-storming, Facilitate or Inhibit Creative Thinking?”Administrative Science Quarterly, 3(June), 23–47.
27.
VicinoFranco, and KrusellJudith, BassBernard M., DeciEdward L., and LandyDavid A. (1973), “The Impact of PROCESS: Self-Administered Exercises for Personal and Interpersonal Development,”The Journal of Behavioral Science (November), 737–56.
28.
WellsWilliam D. (1974), “Group Interviewing,” in Handbook of Marketing Research, FerberRobert, ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 133–46.
