BarankinE. W. (1951), On the System of Linear Equations, with Applications to Linear Programming and the Theory of Statistical Hypotheses. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 161–214.
2.
BruvoldN. T. and MurphyR. A. (1978), “Sample Sizes for Comparison of Proportions,”Technometrics, 20 (November), 437–55.
3.
CharnesA., CooperW. W., and FergusonR. O. (1955), “Optimal Estimation of Executive Compensation by Linear Programming,”Management Science, 1 (January), 138–51.
4.
DantzigG. B. and WaldA. (1951), “On the Fundamental Lemma of Neyman and Pearson,”The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 22 (March), 87–93.
5.
FolksJ. L. and AntleC. E. (1965), “Optimum Allocation of Sampling Units to Strata When There are R Responses of Interest,”Journal of the American Statistical Association, 60 (March), 225–33.
6.
FrancisR. L. and WrightG. (1969), “Some Duality Relationships for the Generalized Neyman-Pearson Problem,”Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 4 (December), 394–412.
7.
KokanA. R. and KhanS. (1967), “Optimum Allocation in Multivariate Surveys: An Analytical Solution,”Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B29, 115–25.
8.
KraftO. (1970), “Programming Methods in Statistics and Probability Theory,” in Nonlinear Programming, RosenJ. B., MangasarianO. L., and RitterK., eds. New York: Academic Press, 425–46.
9.
MeeksH. D. and FrancisR. L. (1973), “Duality Relationships for a Nonlinear Version of the Generalized Neyman-Pearson Problem,”Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 11 (April), 360–78.
10.
PukelsheimR. (1978), “A Quick Introduction to Mathematical Programming with Applications to Most Powerful Tests, Nonnegative Variance Estimation and Optimal Design Theory,”Technical Report 128. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
11.
RajD. (1956), “On the Method of Overlapping Maps in Sample Surveys,”Sankhya, 17 (June), 89–98.
