Despite conceptual benefits expressed for comparative advertising, most studies have found it relatively ineffective and lacking credibility. By means of a field experiment, the author explores the impact of the attribution theory tool of two-sided claims on the credibility and effectiveness of comparative advertising. Results suggest that the effectiveness of comparative advertising might be significantly increased with such tactics.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Advertising Age (1977), “Comparative Ads Graded ‘F’ by CBBB President,”48 (October 17), 2, 98.
2.
BoddewynJ. S. and MartonK. (1978), “Comparison Advertising and Consumers,”Journal of Contemporary Business, 1, 135–47.
3.
BrownStephen W. and JacksonD. W.Jr. (1977), “Comparative Television Advertising: Examining Its Nature and Frequency,”Journal of Advertising, 6 (October), 15–18.
4.
CarlsmithMerril (1975), personal communication.
5.
CohenS. E. (1976), “Widespread FTC Probe Will Seek Codes that Hinder Comparative Ads,”Advertising Age, 47 (February 23), 1, 144.
6.
ConversePhilip E. (1970), “Attitudes and Nonattitudes: Continuation of a Dialogue,” in The Quantitative Analysis of Social Problems, TuffeE. F., ed. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
7.
CraigS. Samuel and McCannJohn M. (1978), “Item Nonresponse in Mail Surveys: Extent and Correlates,”Journal of Marketing Research, 15 (May), 285–9.
8.
DixonW. J. and MasseyF. J. A. (1957), Introduction to Statistical Analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
9.
EtgarMichael and GoodwinStephen A. (1978), “Comparative Advertising: Issues and Problems,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 5, HuntH. Keith, ed. Chicago: Association for Consumer Research, 63–71.
10.
Federal Trade Commission (1978), “Ads Giving Useful Price Data and Product Information Would Aid Business, Help Inflation Fight, Says FTC Chairman,”FTC News Summary (November 10).
11.
GoldenLinda L. (1976), “Consumer Reactions to Comparative Advertising,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 3, AndersonBeverlee B., ed. Cincinnati: Association for Consumer Research, 63–7.
12.
GoldenLinda L. (1979), “Consumer Reactions to Explicit Brand Comparisons in Advertisements,”Journal of Marketing Research, 16 (), 517–32.
13.
HowardNiles (1977), “Battle Over Comparative Ads,”Dun's Review, 110 (November), 60–2.
14.
JainSubhash C. and HacklemanEdwin C. (1978), “How Effective is Comparison Advertising for Stimulating Brand Recall?” Journal of Advertising, 1 (Summer), 20–5.
15.
JonesE. E. and DavisK. (1965), “From Acts to Dispositions,” in Advances in Experimental Psychology, BerkowitzLeonard, ed. New York: Academic Press, 219–66.
16.
KelleyHarold E. (1973), “A Test of the Relationship Between Trait and Causal Attribution,”American Psychologist, 107–28.
17.
LambC. W., PrideW. M., and PletcherB. A. (1977), “A Taxonomy for Comparative Advertising Research,”Journal of Advertising, 7 (Winter), 43–7.
18.
LevinePhillip (1976), “Commercials That Name Competing Brands,”Journal of Advertising Research, 16 (December), 7–14.
19.
LutzRichard J. and SwasyJohn (1977), “Integrating Cognitive Structure and Cognitive Response Approaches to Monitoring Communications and Effects,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 4, PerreaultWilliam D., ed. Atlanta: Association for Consumer Research, 363–371.
20.
MostellerF. and BushR. R. (1954), “Selected Quantitative Techniques,” in Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. I, LindzeyG., ed. New York: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
21.
OlsonJerry C., ToyDaniel R., and DoverPhilip A. (1978), “Mediating Effects of Cognitive Responses to Advertising on Cognitive Structure,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 1, HuntH. Keith, ed. Ann Arbor: Association for Consumer Research, 72–78.
22.
PeterJ. Paul (1979), “Reliability: A Review of Psychometric Basics and Recent Marketing Practices,”Journal of Marketing Research, 16 (February), 6–17.
23.
PettyRichard E. (1977), “The Importance of Cognitive Responses in Persuasion,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 4, PerreaultWilliam D., ed. Atlanta: Association for Consumer Research, 358–62.
24.
PrasadV. Kanti (1976), “Communications-Effectiveness of Comparative Advertising—A Laboratory Analysis,”Journal of Marketing Research, 13 (May), 128–37.
25.
PrideW. M., LambC. W., and PletcherB. A. (1977), “Are Comparative Advertisements More Informative for Owners of the Mentioned Competing Brand Than for Nonowners,”American Marketing Association Proceedings, 41, 297–301.
26.
SchnabelMorton (1974–75), “Conscious Parallelism and Advertising Themes—The Case for Comparative Advertising,”Antitrust Law and Economics Review, 7, 11–20.
27.
SettleRobert B. and GoldenLinda L. (1974), “Attribution Theory and Advertising Credibility,”Journal of Marketing Research11 (May), 181–5.
28.
ShimpTerence A. and DyerDavid C. (1978), “The Effects of Comparative Advertising Mediated by Market Position of Sponsoring Brand,”Journal of Advertising, 7 (Summer), 13–19.
29.
SmithRobert E. and HuntShelby D. (1978), “Attributional Processes and Effects in Promotional Situations,”Journal of Consumer Research, 5 (December), 149–58.
30.
WilkieWilliam L. and FarrisPaul W. (1975), “Comparison Advertising: Problems and Potential,”Journal of Marketing, 39 (October), 7–15.
31.
WilsonR. Dale (1976), “An Empirical Evaluation of Comparative Advertising Messages: Subjects' Responses on Perceptual Dimensions,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 3, AndersonBeverlee B., ed. Cincinnatti: Association for Consumer Research, 53–7.
32.
WilsonR. Dale and MuderrisogluAydin (1979), “An Analysis of Cognitive Responses to Comparative Advertising,”Working Series in Marketing Number84 (August), Pennsylvania State University.
33.
WrightPeter L. (1973), “The Cognitive Processes Mediating Acceptance of Advertising,”Journal of Marketing Research, 10 (February), 53–62.
34.
WrightPeter L. (1974), “On the Direct Monitoring of Cognitive Response to Advertising,” in Buyer/Consumer Information Processing, HughesG. David and RayMichael L., eds. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 220–48.
